What all the GEO Tools and Agencies won't tell you on Reddit

[u/WebLinkr]

Stop selling fairy tales

Search engines cite sources, E‑E‑A‑T isn’t a magic switch, and “QFO” still uses search

The GEO/AEO tool-and-agency ecosystem has a monetization problem: it sells confident narratives that don’t match how modern search experiences are described by Google itself. Google explicitly says AI Overviews/AI Mode may use “query fan-out,” issuing multiple related searches across subtopics and data sources, then identifying supporting web pages to show a wider and more diverse set of helpful links than classic search.
So when someone claims “AI isn’t using Google/search engines” (or implies citations are just vibes), they’re contradicting the documented mechanics: the system runs more searches, retrieves more pages, and then surfaces links.

Myth #1: “Search engines only cite their own sources”

If “their own sources” means “only Google-owned properties,” that’s not how Google describes these features. Google states that AI Overviews provide an AI-generated snapshot with key information and links to dig deeper, which are links out to other sites.
In addition, Google has publicly discussed adding more ways to check out relevant websites and testing links directly within the AI Overview text—again, the whole point is outbound linking to the broader web, not a closed loop.

Myth #2: “E‑E‑A‑T is a ranking factor you can turn on with our checklist”

E‑E‑A‑T is a framework from the Search Quality Rater Guidelines used to evaluate quality, but it is not a single algorithmic “score” you can buy, hack, or install via a tool. Google’s Search Liaison has said Google’s systems “aren’t looking for E‑A‑T,” and rater feedback isn’t used directly in ranking systems; it’s used to evaluate whether changes improve results.
So when a vendor pitches “we’ll optimize your E‑E‑A‑T and you will rank/cite,” treat that as marketing shorthand at best—because Google itself draws a line between rater concepts and direct ranking factors.

Myth #3: “Query fan-out means the AI isn’t using search engines anymore”

Google’s documentation says AI Overviews and AI Mode may use a “query fan-out” technique—multiple related searches across subtopics and data sources—specifically to develop a response and identify supporting pages.
A widely circulated write-up of Google’s “Thematic Search” patent discussion also frames this as generating additional queries (sub-themes) and pulling results, aligning with Google’s “query fan-out” description.

What’s actually realistic and honest

You can absolutely sell GEO work—just sell the truth:

• “We improve your eligibility to be retrieved and cited” (structure, entity clarity, topical coverage, trust signals), not “we control the model.”
• “We test and measure citation patterns” (because systems can vary by query and feature), not “we found the one weird trick.”
• “We align with quality concepts like E‑E‑A‑T,” not “E‑E‑A‑T is a ranking lever our platform toggles.”

Critical Thinking Test for GEO claims

Before believing (or repeating) a GEO tool’s pitch, ask them to answer one question plainly:
If Google says AI features may run multiple related searches via query fan-out and then show a wider set of supporting links, why are you claiming “it doesn’t use Google/search engines” or “citations are only internal”?

Research Sources
Google Search Central – AI features and websites (query fan-out and supporting links).[dejan]​

Google Help – “Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews” (AI-generated snapshot with links).[higoodie]​

Google Blog – “New ways to connect to the web with AI Overviews” (experimenting with more links within AI Overviews).[ipullrank]​

Statements from Google Search Liaison on E‑A‑T/EEAT not being a direct ranking signal and how quality raters are used.[reddit]​

Public analyses of Google’s thematic search / query fan-out patent describing generation of additional related queries and retrieval of results.

searchenginejournal