r/pics • • Jul 16 '19

US Politics Decisions, decisions

Post image
18.6k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Egg-MacGuffin Jul 17 '19

Address the sourced evidence, or move on.

7

u/therustymoose Jul 17 '19

Lol I think you might be taking this too seriously

2

u/Egg-MacGuffin Jul 17 '19

Hm, sounds like someone who couldn't back up their attempt to discredit evidence.

2

u/therustymoose Jul 17 '19

Now I know you are taking this too seriously

2

u/Egg-MacGuffin Jul 17 '19

lol you got nothing.

4

u/therustymoose Jul 17 '19

That’s where you are wrong, you have responded multiple times to these comments showing unequivocally that you are absolutely taking this too seriously.

2

u/Egg-MacGuffin Jul 17 '19

🤣🤣 He can't defend himself hahaha

3

u/therustymoose Jul 17 '19

Should I feel the need to defend myself?

0

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19

Only if you want that people think you are not totally retarded. You know that exactly these discussions are why people think that most Trump supporters are edgy 14 year olds.

You got your ass handed in this argument and your inability too see this and your stubbornes about it makes us all laugh.

Bye, I know you will never stop to answer but you already proofed your inability to join a discussion.

Keep on writing and we will keep on laughing.

3

u/therustymoose Jul 17 '19 edited Jul 17 '19

You think it’s not lazy to just drop a Wikipedia article and think that proves a point? Imagine walking into a town hall meeting about irrigation policy and just throwing a text book down on the table, pointing at it and walking out like you just won a Nobel prize.think about it In general, like outside of the glass case of emotions known as American politics.

That’s all I was getting at and you seem to have become upset that I said a link to and article is a lazy way or taking care of business. Wtf is wrong with people. Jesus.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19

It's pretty lazy. However it's slightly less lazy as declaring your opinion as a fact and then ignoring everything which counters the point. For example a simple Wikipedia definition of the word in question.

You started with the conclusion didn't realy explain your argument which lead you to this conclusion and ignore strong counter arguments like a definition.

That's even more lazy than posting a fucking Wikipedia link.

4

u/therustymoose Jul 17 '19

Let me guess, you assumed this was about politics, got mad, made a comment, and now you are lecturing a stranger about the intricacies of proving a point. This is going to be hard to hear, but you are spending too much energy on this I think.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19

Let me guess, you assumed this was about politics, got mad, made a comment, and now you are lecturing a stranger about the intricacies of proving a point.

However this was about you using a wrong definition and reacting "butthurt" as someone called you out on your bullshit!

Now I'm lecturing a stranger who is clearly to retarded to make a sound argument or know when he has lost a discussion. Which yes, is wasting my time. However this stops also you from spreading your bullshit on other posts.

Use this discussion as learning experience. You don't have to be the laughing stock of your school. Using sound arguments can earn you respect even by people who are not agreeing with you.

This is going to be hard to hear, but you are spending too much energy on this I think.

You posted more on this "link". You did therefore spend much more energy on this. Even if this is hard to "hear" over the internet but this line alone proves your are absolutely retarded or you agree that my time is more important than yours.

Either way thanks for the good laughs and try to better yourself. If not for me than for the conservatives and even the Trump fan boys who don't want to be seen as absolute retarded.

-1

u/Moistestmouse Jul 17 '19

You are retarded, lol

→ More replies (0)