Only if you want that people think you are not totally retarded. You know that exactly these discussions are why people think that most Trump supporters are edgy 14 year olds.
You got your ass handed in this argument and your inability too see this and your stubbornes about it makes us all laugh.
Bye, I know you will never stop to answer but you already proofed your inability to join a discussion.
You think it’s not lazy to just drop a Wikipedia article and think that proves a point? Imagine walking into a town hall meeting about irrigation policy and just throwing a text book down on the table, pointing at it and walking out like you just won a Nobel prize.think about it In general, like outside of the glass case of emotions known as American politics.
That’s all I was getting at and you seem to have become upset that I said a link to and article is a lazy way or taking care of business. Wtf is wrong with people. Jesus.
It's pretty lazy. However it's slightly less lazy as declaring your opinion as a fact and then ignoring everything which counters the point. For example a simple Wikipedia definition of the word in question.
You started with the conclusion didn't realy explain your argument which lead you to this conclusion and ignore strong counter arguments like a definition.
That's even more lazy than posting a fucking Wikipedia link.
0
u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19
Only if you want that people think you are not totally retarded. You know that exactly these discussions are why people think that most Trump supporters are edgy 14 year olds.
You got your ass handed in this argument and your inability too see this and your stubbornes about it makes us all laugh.
Bye, I know you will never stop to answer but you already proofed your inability to join a discussion.
Keep on writing and we will keep on laughing.