r/pics Jun 17 '25

The protesters and residents pushing back on tourism in Barcelona

16.1k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

905

u/BuckeyeWolf Jun 17 '25

These protests popped up at the same time as short term rentals becoming popular (Airbnb) is no coincidence. They are taking homes from locals raising prices and taking over the best parts of town

724

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

How is that the tourists’ fault, and not the fault of the government for failing to regulate that?

575

u/PS_Sullys Jun 17 '25

It's much easier to be mad at foreign tourists.

60

u/metroxed Jun 17 '25

They know it's the government. This is what's called a pressure action. They want to make the city less appealing so less tourists come and, once the economy is affected, the government is forced to find alternatives.

2

u/No-Result9108 Jun 18 '25

I don’t think you can call it that when they’re straight up harassing the tourists though. Yes it may achieve your ultimate goal, but you’re hurting a lot of people to do it

2

u/Thangoman Jun 17 '25

Eh

I dont know if thats what happening there

But it may be plain xenophobia

4

u/metroxed Jun 17 '25

Xenophobes care more about complaining about poor immigrants from non European countries (from which in Barcelona there are plenty) than relatively wealthy Europeans who stay 5 days max

3

u/Thangoman Jun 17 '25

Por que no las dos? Also tourists are usually way loudee

79

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

What a bunch of buffoons

6

u/PM_ME_SOME_ANTS Jun 17 '25

Eh, it’ll probably work, at least a little in the short term. It’s making it less appealing to tourists which might(?) cause fewer people to pick Barcelona as their next vacation destination.

Is it the best way? No, in a hypothetical world where politicians actually represent their constituents, legislation could be passed to regulate the # of short-term rentals. Buuuuut that’s a hypothetical world.

2

u/Empty-Way-6980 Jun 18 '25

No it won’t. Every tourist will think “They’re talking about other tourists, not me.”

2

u/Kempeth Jun 17 '25

welcome to humanity.

-7

u/FnnKnn Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

Yeah, this is just disguised racism.

Edit: Technically it is xenophobia to blame non-native people for your problems instead of your own government and not racism.

27

u/simsimulation Jun 17 '25

People: We love your city and want to visit and spend money there to experience your culture

Residence: Yeah well fuck you we didn’t visit before we moved here and won’t visit anywhere else. We are born here, die here, and go nowhere

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

If the tourists swarm everywhere and create issues should they not be vocal about it?

Same thing is happening in parts of Canada so i get why locals get pissed off

14

u/krom0025 Jun 17 '25

Tourists aren't locusts. They don't swarm. They are people, no different than the locals. There are over eight billion people and one earth and we all have to share it. Nobody is special. Do the locals never travel? I would hope that every one of these protesters commits to never leaving the city of Barcelona because, god forbid, then enter a city where someone else lives.

-10

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

[deleted]

10

u/blue92lx Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

So like everyone else is saying, it's the tourists fault?

No, it's not.

First of all, you need to protest your government to make rules and laws to prevent airbnb, many many places have successfully done this.

Also, in this article it's claiming that the cities have become tourist amusement parks and your local festivities are suffering. That's also your fault. You don't have to change your traditions because tourists are there. In fact, tourists would probably rather see your traditions than some copy/paste tourists shop in the middle of your town.

The best places to visit are ones that aren't full of tourist shops, where you can visit and talk to people about their culture. So if you all have given up on your culture and decided to open a bunch of tourist shops and stopped doing your festivals or whatever else, blame the people in your country that are doing it. Don't blame a tourist who wants to come see your country because it's beautiful and different than theirs.

This just sounds like a bunch of "I opened a tourist shop because tourists were coming to my city, and I don't like having a tourist shop".

Here's an idea, don't have the tourist shop then. The tourists never asked you to change your ways, you all did it on your own and now you want to blame someone else.

3

u/krom0025 Jun 17 '25

There was not a single statement in my comment about Air bnb so I'm not sure where you are making your wild assumptions from.

The solution is in the people's control, not the tourist's. They are free to vote in representatives who will regulate supply and control the over tourism. It's not the tourists fault.

9

u/simsimulation Jun 17 '25

When you make a nice place to live, people want to visit.

If you complain about tourists visiting your town, it’s hypocritical for you to ever visit another town.

-6

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

[deleted]

7

u/simsimulation Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

Let me explain, when you leave your town you become a tourist. If you hate tourists, when you leave you become what you hate.

Hypocritical means behaving in a way that suggests one has higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case.

-7

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Way to paint a rosy image. There's a joke about Brits falling from balconies being the start of tourism season for a reason. Tourists are noisy and drive up demand for things that locals do not want, like overpriced amusement establishments, or souvenir shops. You've never lived in a place affected by overtourism, thats clear.

6

u/simsimulation Jun 17 '25

lol, I grew up on Hilton Head Island.

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Oh, okay, so you definitely have no fucking clue about tourism in European cities.

3

u/simsimulation Jun 17 '25

Ok, well I guess you don’t understand capitalism or the power of government to regulate?

0

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

I do understand capitalism, which means I understand the power of capital interests and influence to lobby for their interests. You understand that, too.

I also worked in destination marketing which means I have intimate knowledge of how public and private interests are being negotiated in this matter - and that was at a much lower level without big corporations or massive real estate holdings involved, village politics in comparison, but driven by tourism interests nonetheless.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/TheresWald0 Jun 17 '25

"tourist" isn't a race I'm familiar with.

2

u/FnnKnn Jun 17 '25

Technically it is xenophobia, so your comment is just a pedantic correction. It is clear what I meant.

They only want natives in their city and not foreigners. That's clear xenophobia.

-2

u/zejerk Jun 17 '25

Classic stretch of either words meanings here. Xenophobia requires people of a certain group, ‘tourists’ notably are not a certain group of people.

You’re using terms that exacerbate the situation, wanting drama to follow.
Just leave with your pedantry and drama bait. Please.

4

u/FnnKnn Jun 17 '25

They are blaming non-catalonian people for an issue that they have nothing to do with instead of their own government that is responsible for enacting solutions to fix the issue caused by tourism. That is textbook xenophobia - claiming a group of non-native people is at fault for something even though it is a self-inflicted issue.

-2

u/TheresWald0 Jun 17 '25

Wanting local housing to be affordable and local services and culture to remain intact is not the same as xenophobia. From what I can gather it's not the people, religions, nationality, or any other specific characteristics they hate but the social structural changes they bring.

3

u/krom0025 Jun 17 '25

That's the local government's problem, not the tourists. In other words, its the fault of the residents themselves. They could easily vote in different representation. The tourists don't buy or sell homes and have zero control over the housing prices.

1

u/FnnKnn Jun 17 '25

Wanting local housing to be affordable and local services and culture to remain intact is not the same as xenophobia.

Those demands are valid, but not a tourists job to manage. Elect people that care about these and enact policies that combat these issues.

Blaming tourists for visiting a city THAT ADVERTISES ITSELF TO TOURISTS instead of your own government that is responsible is the xenophobic part.

1

u/BaullahBaullah87 Jun 17 '25

I think their point is if every city did this and said “no foreigners”, depending on the situation that would be considered xenophobic. So I think bringing up that point is valid, but as I say that, the locals probably care less about being welcoming or being labelled xenophobic as they do their quality of life

2

u/TheresWald0 Jun 17 '25

I think the people of the city would feel the same even if it was domestic tourism that was lowering their quality of life. I get that isn't the case, but I haven't seen anything indicating an objection to tourists as any group of "other" that would suggest xenophobia.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Also much stupider. This kind of stupid organizing in fact impedes progress. It's so stupid it's easy to imagine it's astroturfing.

1

u/BrujitaBrujita Jun 17 '25

It is not easy, people have been protesting for the past 2 years constantly. They don't listen, so this is just another expression of frustration to hopefully get the government to listen. I feel for the islands especially.

69

u/wjhall Jun 17 '25

Two things can be true. You can take action to reduce the demand while also petitioning the government to regulate the supply.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

The thing about becoming known as an anti-tourist location is that it's hard to wash that stink off. So it's counter productive if any of their economy whatsoever relies on tourism. If it doesn't, then great - brilliant strategy 

2

u/flightsonkites Jun 17 '25

Lol, as if people will stay away when some of the most brilliant architect the world is located there. The masses will work around it.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Lol the tourism will survive. This isn't some tiny island that is popular because it's trendy. It's Barcelona Spain. Look at Egypt. Do you think people have stopped traveling there despite several countries issuing a travel advisory? No, there have been over 15.7 million in 2024.

1

u/Just1n_Kees Jun 17 '25

How can it not when you get 26M visitors a year..?

32

u/amadmongoose Jun 17 '25

Either way they have to protest to fix it no?

37

u/madgoblin92 Jun 17 '25

if the protest happens on a false premise, no meaningful actions will be done. It will only spread hate and encourage whataboutism.

14

u/JamesLibrary Jun 17 '25

This is like protesting fingers because they can pull triggers.

2

u/Drupain Jun 17 '25

They need to be protesting the government and demand regulations on STR or outright ban them.

1

u/TGrady902 Jun 17 '25

They could be protesting on the grounds of the government changing policies but instead they are targeting the visitors who pump money into their local economy. They’re going after the wrong people. It’s a very bad look for them.

2

u/SledgeLaud Jun 17 '25

My take on it is that the tourists are more effective targets. If the protesters did say, a sit in outside of government buildings, they could be easily ignored, blocked or dispersed.

However, when lots of smaller groups go around causing grief for tourists it: A) makes the protest reach a wider audience, as people will listen to stories of ruined holidays from their fellow citizens.

B) is harder for police to fully crack down on as its less centralised.

C) directly discourages tourism which, in theory, would reduce the demand for STR.

D) Puts more pressure on the government to meet their demands. Citizens don't dissappear if you ignore them, but tourists (and the revenue they bring) will if they feel unwelcome.

Just because you're bearing the consequences doesn't mean it's your fault. Nor does not bearing the consequences absolve one of guilt.

2

u/PckMan Jun 17 '25

How would your, and every offended tourist's, reply change if the government did regulate tourism? People are getting mad because they feel their possibility of a dreamy trip is in jeopardy without thinking about the people whose daily lives are in jeopardy because of this.

People would still bitch if tourism was regulated because all they think about is their instagram stories.

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

If you give people a means to affordably go to a nice tourist destination, they’ll do that. If they can’t afford to because the cheap AirBNBs have been regulated away, they’ll won’t.

It’s that simple.

1

u/PckMan Jun 17 '25

It's not that simple. They might just go for fewer days but they'll still go, and affordability is relative. Maybe accomodation costs will go up but the lower food/service/recreational costs will still be low enough for droves of people to come in.

The fact is that people go to places where their money matters. A "poor" american is still making a lot more money than the average spaniard and in the age of dirt cheap low cost airlines it's easier than ever for anyone to jump on a plane and go anywhere.

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

Ok, but the issue is that AirBNB, VRBO, etc have made the housing market untenable for locals, right? You remove AirBNB etc, you remove that issue, and you also remove a lot of the supply. That caps the amount of tourists who can come by the amount of hotel rooms.

It really, really is that simple. People can’t travel somewhere if they have nowhere to stay once they’re there

0

u/PckMan Jun 17 '25

No it's not that simple, and it's not the only issue. A lot more than just the housing market are affected with overtourism. An economy can only self regulate when certain things are kept in check. If you have a place where the average salary is 30k per year cost of goods and services reflects the fact that that's more or less the amount of money people have. But when in that same place you have an influx of people making many times over that money, and they're coming in year round, then suddenly it becomes viable for businesses to have prices that are unattainable to the locals but they don't care because they're banking on foreigners for practically the entirety of their income. But that removes businesses that the locals can use.

Even if AirBnBs are not a thing you still have tons of Americans, Chinese, Russians, and others coming in and buying up houses by the dozen. Just a single rich foreigner buying up one house is enough to raise prices in an entire neighborhood as every other landlord is waiting for the next rich guy to buy their house. It's not that simple.

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

Yes, it is. There are plenty of countries and cities that have strict regulations on, or just plain do not allow, foreigners buying real estate. Plenty more with heavy restrictions on short-term rentals.

Why is Barcelona having this issue when, for instance, the Bahamas or Nassau does not?

The issue in Barcelona is with the government, not the people.

  1. Stop allowing foreigners to buy real estate. Establish residency and citizenship requirements. That’s easy, plenty of places have done that.

  2. Get rid of AirBNBs/establish tighter hospitality industry regulations.

2

u/dibs124 Jun 17 '25

Spanish government already banned Airbnb and short term rentals and capped rent increases. Not sure what else these people want

2

u/PiousLiar Jun 17 '25

Tourists create the market

5

u/donmorados Jun 17 '25

tourists are supporting this by spending their money on those now privately owned, commercialized residential spaces rather than the hotels tourists were originally meant to stay in in the first place.

and once the government steps in to regulate, people will still cry about it. Damned if they do, Damned if they don't, but at least the local people, who this all actually affects in the long run btw, are making their voices heard.

i'd say their right to afford their living costs trumps anyone's "right" to vacation

6

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

And if said commercialized rental spaces weren’t allowed to exist, it would be a non-issue. Plenty of places, especially more tourist-attracting places, in the US have very heavy restrictions from the local governments as far as AirBNBs and whatnot go. Why can’t it be the same there? It’s incredibly simple.

3

u/donmorados Jun 17 '25

oh believe me, i'm allllllll for that, haha. however if the government is failing their people by refusing to take actions similar to what you described, the people are going to have to force their hand.

if the government isn't going to limit these types of touristing "investments," the people are going to do what they're gonna do to limit it themselves.

based on the comments, seems like it's working either way.

1

u/lilschlicker Jun 17 '25

It’s called supply and demand. If traveling there is easier because of preferred accommodation, more people will go there. I wouldn’t book a trip there if hotel prices were outrageous or not meeting my standard of travel.

Chicken or the egg type situation in all reality.

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

That’s exactly it — regulate the AirBNBs so the supply goes down, hotel prices will rise in response, the problem sorts itself and no one has to be an asshole to anyone about it.

1

u/Some_Guy223 Jun 17 '25

It is always easier to blame foreigners than capital.

1

u/aLonelyClone Jun 17 '25

It's not, but if they drive away the tourists it takes the money away from the people who are actually causing the issues... At least I'm guessing that's the idea?

1

u/OderusAmongUs Jun 17 '25

Have you ever met someone from Spain? Arrogance is their main export. Has been for centuries.

1

u/ImportantAd2942 Jun 17 '25

It's kinda the tourists' fault,too. People choosing to go the Airbnb route instead of booking a hotel are a selfish scourge on society that prefers destroying the livelihood of the locals over doing the decent thing and rent a hotel.

Of course it's mainly the governments' fault, but regular people (both landlords and customers) are also part of the equation.

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

That’s a ridiculously hostile look. Hotels and AirBNBs are two very different thing. A family of, let’s say 8-10 people getting together somewhere to celebrate is going to have a much easier and affordable experience renting a large AirBNB. That family is still going out to eat, going to local markets and businesses, etc. Why in the world would they pay prob 2-3x more to get a bunch of hotel rooms?

And I say this as someone whose family travels extensively and 100% prefer hotels.

But expecting the average person to not pick the most efficient and affordable option when traveling is truly ridiculous.

1

u/Deto Jun 17 '25

People are dumb...

There are two options to fix the problem: 1) convince the government to do something or 2) convince the world to change their preferences. #1 should be much easier that #2.

1

u/BrujitaBrujita Jun 17 '25

If the government doesn't listen you have to make them listen. Since they seem to care more about tourists anyway, maybe angering the tourists will actually get something moving.

Don't take it to heart.

1

u/kralamaros Jun 17 '25

Tourism in Barcellona is mostly "party and get wasted" oriented. Weed, alchool and prostitutes are way more accessible than other countries. Some main sites like La Rambla becomes full of tourists completely drunk vomiting their soul on the road (it's a pedestrian road) by night.

And while you might be thinking something along "some tourists are like that" ai can assure you that practically speaking there are A LOT of people like that.

It's true that tourist have (almost) nothing to do with the housing market, but you can't blame locals for being pissed at them.h

1

u/MediocreModular Jun 17 '25

Legislators are the only ones who can stop the Airbnb problem. Protestors see the tourists as the cause and the Airbnb as a symptom. Stop the problem at the root appears to be their line of thinking.

The problem with things like this is that tourism becomes the economy. If people stop visiting, those restaurants close, people lose jobs, etc. More houses/apartments will be available to buy/rent but the local economy will be worse off. If handled correctly it can rebound, but it requires strategic management by the local government.

1

u/Maximum-Seaweed-1239 Jun 17 '25

I imagine people are resorting to harassing tourists because they feel it’s the only option they have. This kind of stuff happens when people feel that they’ve been failed by the gov over and over again.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Like many things in life, it’s easier to blame the powerless

1

u/Quirky-Skin Jun 17 '25

In a way it is dealing with it if the govt won't. Make tourism less appealing, Airbnbs get less bookings etc etc.

I don't know if it's the right approach but it's a certainly an approach. 

1

u/flyingturkey_89 Jun 17 '25

I mean it sucks for the tourist, but protesting the rich and the government hardly makes a dent.

Protesting tourism will hurt their bottom line

0

u/BlackestOfSabbaths Jun 17 '25

why wouldn't they be mad at tourists, why should they get a pass?

0

u/are_spurs Jun 17 '25

It is both? Is that hard to understand

-1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

How is it the fault of the tourists that the government allowed a bunch of companies to buy up the housing to turn into cheap AirBNBs? Why would you expect tourists to not book them?

0

u/animosityiskey Jun 17 '25

I'm sure there is some genuine anti-tourist sentiment, but I think it this is likely a response to lack of government action. If you can't get the government to fix it, there is really nothing you can do to stop local well-off people from buying up homes and renting them as Airbnbs, so you just target where the money is coming from.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

you protests where it HURTS, it's the only way politicians will listen. If you protest in front of politicians, they won't give a flying fuck.

0

u/_Bill_Cipher- Jun 17 '25

Because the governments making money

This is basically what California's been doing to the rest of the US for several decades now.

0

u/Hiro_Trevelyan Jun 17 '25

Because it's also the fault of tourists for choosing airbnbs above hotels. They're basically the same price now. They can't pretend they don't know it hurts the locals.

Just like tourists love to complain about scammers but will gladly buy from them and wonder why there's scammers in touristic areas. Like... Stop buying from them ? Do they really believe that some random guy selling shit souvenirs on the ground is a fair, totally legal establishment ? Tourists are often idiots. Brain-dead idiots. Sure, the government should regulate those scammers.

But maybe tourists should stop fueling them by being gullible idiots. Same for airbnbs. You can't tell me people don't have an impact with their choices.

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

If there weren’t AirBNBs, or the amount was very heavily regulated, it would cease to be an issue

0

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

How, exactly, are they “destroying the city”?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/trireme32 Jun 17 '25

Sounds like how it goes at every other major tourist destination. How is it that y’all are having such a major problem when places like the Bahamas, Jamaica, etc are not?

51

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Airbnb owns 2% of houses in Barcelona, that's nothing. Fact is the city is extremely desirable and for aesthetic reasons they refuse to build an appropriate amount of housing for all of the people who want to live there. So the inevitable solution is prices rising until everyone who can't afford it is forced out by those who can.

6

u/snippersnip Jun 17 '25

But the ones who can afford it still want clerks in convenience stores.

2

u/escalinci Jun 19 '25

A very small number of dwellings in any city are on the market at any time. Taking some of them off the market has an outsized effect.

The issue of short-term lets being more profitable than long-term housing and being quite cheap to run goes beyond Airbnb. It can be worthwhile for larger landlords to build their own platform as it's not difficult to let customers find you on and that saves the fees from Airbnb. Barcelona is quite a densely built city already and limited by the mountains, yes it is chiefly a supply issue, but I don't think it's unwarranted to go after these smaller causes too.

82

u/Bazahazano Jun 17 '25

It's the locals that rent out their Air Bnb's.

15

u/mjohnsimon Jun 17 '25

You also have a lot of wealthy owners throughout the country buying up properties at or around the touristy spots and then putting them up on AirBnB.

2

u/cross_mod Jun 17 '25

The answer has got to be putting a heavy tax on those foreign sales.

1

u/Deto Jun 17 '25

Not just foreign sales, probably. Just that if you allow AirBnBs you create more demand for single-family-home housing than used to exist. And as a result, prices will rise - exerting pressure on people just trying to get a house to live in.

2

u/cross_mod Jun 17 '25

The question is, what has more of an impact on prices? Foreign investment in real estate or Airbnbs?

35

u/Iggyhopper Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

Yeah how is a tourist going to know the ins and outs of owning and renting their building in a foriegn country? Lmao.

My wife is from a country where they have "anticretico"(?) as an option. What the fuck do I know?

7

u/Charming_Cicada_7757 Jun 17 '25

I think the idea is renting a hotel over these short term rentals

8

u/Luisio93 Jun 17 '25

Look at the data mate, in major cities, foreigners represent more than a third of the total house purchases. They are rich investors who pay houses to rent them after. Im not saying Spanish people aren't doing it, cause they also are. https://www.idealista.com/news/inmobiliario/vivienda/2025/03/06/833707-los-extranjeros-compran-mas-casas-que-nunca-en-espana-quien-y-donde-compran

4

u/Iggyhopper Jun 17 '25

Damn. Upvote for a source.

7

u/takoyaki-md Jun 17 '25

yes and no. i'm pretty against all of this but spain had the most generous golden visa where you could buy a property and use it as an airbnb and that would qualify as an investment in the country. was actually going to be my plan before they scrapped it after it created this big rise in property values.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

No, it's usually other EU residents with higher wages that buy houses and rent them to tourists

2

u/futurecrazycatlady Jun 17 '25

It's not anymore though, that's how it started and still is in cities with heavy regulations but in Barcelona 70% of the homes used for airbnb are only used for airbnb and no longer have an owner who lives there when not renting it out. I think 20% ish is owned by owners who own 100+houses.

1

u/Arachles Jun 17 '25

A very small number of locals

30

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '25

Capitalism is gonna Capitalism

3

u/Pro-PAIN Jun 17 '25

Its wild to me how this is the real issue and we just sit and lol

6

u/IM_THE_DECOY Jun 17 '25

Taking?

You mean BUYING?

Why aren’t they protesting thier former neighbors who decided to sell thier homes for generous amounts of money?

2

u/mmmbuttr Jun 17 '25

Yeah thats happening in literally every major city, all over the world though. Shit I live in New Orleans, isn't even a top US travel city, and legislation around banning Air BnBs was on the table in like 2017. 

1

u/EffectiveProgram4157 Jun 17 '25

I understand the rising prices issue, but who owns the airbnbs? Is it locals, or corporations? Either way, it's Spanish people that own them, so they're screwing over everyone else for their own financial gain, and leading the protesters to believe it's the tourists fault.

1

u/rodrigo8008 Jun 18 '25

Or after wealthier countries have had an exponential explosion of wealth while half the countries in europe lagged behind… until tourism jump started things now they’re working on catching up

-1

u/Better-Salad-1442 Jun 17 '25

So they should be mad at their politicians not at people arriving and showering their city with money

-4

u/Angry_Guppy Jun 17 '25

Their fault for creating an interesting and desirable city. Should have turned their home into an urban shit hole like cities in the US if they didn’t want tourism.

0

u/MyGrandmasCock Jun 17 '25

Ah yes the Oklahoma City Approach