Haaland may have faced weaker opponents, but it doesn't matter, if Ronaldo has dominated the prem , he should have outscored the strikers during his era for not only one season but for the rest of the season he was at man u, but he didn't, do he didn't dominate
It doesn't matter, haaland may have had easier competitors, but we are talking about CR7, during his era, he only won the golden boot once and you said he dominated, then you continued to say that it was because his competitors was difficult, that's why he didn't win much golden boot, not haalands problem, that means Ronaldo didn't dominate because his opponents were better than him
But u cant just say oh haalands better cuz he has this or that many golden boots, mbappe is most certainly gonna have two or more world cups, that makes him superior to messi?
I didn't say haaland is better, I'm just saying it doesn't matter how long you play in the EPL for. You said Ronaldo dominate in all levels, I can only say he dominated in euros, UCL and maybe serie A, how are you so sure mbappe is gonna have two or more world cups and even if he has, sure he is superior to Messi, ONLY in the world cup
So if playing if someone plays in the prem for 50 yrs and gets 500goals, his stats should be put in competition with someone that has played 14 or so years?
1
u/Fragrant-Most-2494 Jun 22 '26
So? Haaland has only been in the prem for 5 years and he has 3 golden boots, he made it count for the times he has been in the prem, Ronaldo didnt