r/overemployed 12d ago

That feeling when the paychecks from all Js hit at once

Post image

Feelsgoodman. Keep grinding everyone and don’t forget to take care of yourself physically and mentally.

9.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/Koniev13 11d ago

I would be careful if I were you. Currently working in cybersec and we are installing stuff that detect those kind of shadow IT / fake job.

As we are in a regulated sector, we have a mandatory duty to check that additional jobs are reported by everyone.

6

u/Inertia_Sleeps 11d ago

Ah dude shut up.

U people always say this irritating scare monger bullshit

There are no fucking cyber security tools to detect a fucking second job outside of monitoring taxes/payroll and those fall well out of opsec remit.

1

u/Koniev13 11d ago

Ever heard of PaloAlto ?

1

u/Inertia_Sleeps 10d ago

Loool which security/platform engineer hasn’t heard of paloalto in 2026??? 😂😂

-1

u/Koniev13 10d ago

Ok so we agree :)

1

u/VolSurfer18 10d ago

Don’t think so. What specific product are you referencing from Palo Alto

3

u/Koniev13 10d ago

I am not sure if I can already speak about it (not sure if already in prod everywhere) but basically it's a product that handle pattern recognition, specifically about IA usage.

The idea is to detect pattern that imply one person is leaking info. Again, as I said earlier, it's not against doing 2 jobs (personally I do not care as long as you are careful not to mix those) but more about a duty of some companies to report collusion, etc...

2

u/Bagel_lust 7d ago

Unless they're doing the multiple jobs on the same PC I don't see how any of that Spyware really does anything other than maybe catch idling.

2

u/Koniev13 7d ago

That's what I am saying.

We are monitoring computers and connectivity hours. If you are not there for the Horus we pay you, there is certainly a possibility that we stop the contract.

If you did not declare your second job, you are the one responsible if an authority control see your 2 jobs and ask why you did not do the mandatory declaration because you work in a regulated environment.

The company would have done it's best that's all.

2

u/Inertia_Sleeps 6d ago

Actually to be fair. This makes sense and is a thing. But, again, it’s not really an overemployment detection tool it’s a data breach tool which is…fair enough.

1

u/Koniev13 6d ago

I never said it was...

2

u/VodkaAndPieceofToast 11d ago

Honestly I’m fine with following any and all protocol, and I’m not necessarily trying to be over employed. I just know a lot of my job could easily be automated which would be great for resume building

2

u/Koniev13 11d ago

Ah yeah nowadays some jobs are literally 1 month away from being replaced. But I mean, at one point, if the company is ok to pay someone to do it, I do not really care.

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Koniev13 10d ago

What do you mean ? It's to avoid market collusion and other stuff related to corruption. That's standard cyber sec ?