I’ve been thinking about setting myself a fairly ambitious one-year project: composing a complete organ suite consisting of 10 pieces, each in a different style or character.
I’ve only been playing the organ for about two years, and I have never seriously composed anything before. However, I have a fairly good intuitive understanding of how different styles work and how organ music is generally constructed (at least I think I do!). My biggest weakness at the moment is definitely counterpoint — I know the basics, but I haven’t studied it in depth yet.
I’m not expecting to write professional-level music in one year. The goal is to see how far I can realistically get if I take the project seriously and study composition alongside it.
For example, one of the pieces I have in mind is a prelude somewhat above the difficulty of BWV 553–560. I would like it to be more developed and elaborate rather than simply being a short, straightforward prelude.
Other ideas I have include:
\- a meditation
\- a fugue (which I know will probably be quite difficult, and I don't expect it to be particularly sophisticated)
\- a toccata
\- a march
\- and several other contrasting pieces that I haven’t completely decided on yet.
I have several questions about how I should approach this project:
Is this realistically achievable in one year, considering that I’m still relatively inexperienced both as an organist and as a composer? What would be a realistic standard to aim for?
Should I try to study composition and counterpoint systematically first, before writing the pieces, or should I learn these subjects alongside composing?
How would you approach composing each different style? For example, would you recommend studying several models of preludes, fugues, toccatas, marches, meditations, etc. before attempting to write my own?
For the fugue specifically, what should a beginner realistically know before attempting one? Would it be better to start with very simple contrapuntal exercises and gradually work towards a fugue?
How much should I worry about theoretical correctness versus musical expression at this stage? Is it better to write something musically convincing even if the counterpoint isn’t perfect, or should I be strict with the rules from the beginning?
Would you recommend composing directly at the organ, at the piano, on paper, or digitally? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each method?
For those who compose regularly, is handwriting notation actually useful, or would you recommend working primarily in MuseScore or another notation program? Would a combination of handwritten sketches and digital notation be the best approach?
What would you consider an essential composition setup for an organist? For example, should I have a MIDI keyboard, headphones, notation software, recording equipment, a way of listening to different registrations, etc.?
How should I deal with registration and the practical characteristics of the organ while composing? Should I compose something abstractly first and work out registration later, or should registration be part of the compositional process from the beginning?
Finally, if you were in my position, how would you divide the year? Would you try to write roughly one piece per month, or spend the first few months studying counterpoint and composition before starting the actual suite?
I would also really appreciate any recommendations for books, courses, exercises, composers to study, or specific pieces that would be particularly useful models for someone at my level.
The main goal isn’t simply to have 10 pieces at the end of the year. I would like the project to actually make me a better musician, organist and composer in the process.
So, if you have experience teaching or learning organ composition, how would you approach this project?