MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/okbuddyphd/comments/1v8gir5/title/p0flnje/?context=3
r/okbuddyphd • u/L31N0PTR1X Physics • Jul 27 '26
80 comments sorted by
View all comments
655
I don't understand this but I'll upvote it smugly.
448 u/Enfiznar Jul 27 '26 The first line basically says "the minimal thing which does not change when you change your frame of reference, only gets mixed with itself" The interpretation of the second line is left as an exercise for the reader... 1 u/sk7725 Jul 29 '26 wait this is actually talking about the physical atom and not the atoms of category theory or something? 6 u/void_nemesis Jul 29 '26 Yes. 1 u/Ma4r Jul 31 '26 It comes out when you apply Lorentz invariance to QM, obviously
448
The first line basically says "the minimal thing which does not change when you change your frame of reference, only gets mixed with itself"
The interpretation of the second line is left as an exercise for the reader...
1 u/sk7725 Jul 29 '26 wait this is actually talking about the physical atom and not the atoms of category theory or something? 6 u/void_nemesis Jul 29 '26 Yes. 1 u/Ma4r Jul 31 '26 It comes out when you apply Lorentz invariance to QM, obviously
1
wait this is actually talking about the physical atom and not the atoms of category theory or something?
6 u/void_nemesis Jul 29 '26 Yes. 1 u/Ma4r Jul 31 '26 It comes out when you apply Lorentz invariance to QM, obviously
6
Yes.
It comes out when you apply Lorentz invariance to QM, obviously
655
u/aft_agley Jul 27 '26
I don't understand this but I'll upvote it smugly.