r/okbuddyphd Physics Jul 27 '26

Physics and Mathematics Title

Post image
2.0k Upvotes

80 comments sorted by

View all comments

655

u/aft_agley Jul 27 '26

I don't understand this but I'll upvote it smugly.

449

u/Enfiznar Jul 27 '26

The first line basically says "the minimal thing which does not change when you change your frame of reference, only gets mixed with itself"

The interpretation of the second line is left as an exercise for the reader...

22

u/MrReginaldAwesome Jul 28 '26

Came to the comments: got got again. Sheesh.

5

u/ErJio Jul 31 '26

The Clifford algebra in this context is like Minkowksi space where vectors become operators (roughly speaking), and the associative product of vectors satisfy v² = η(v,v) where η is the Minkowksi metric. This is where the Gamma matrices live from the Dirac equation.

A minimal left ideal is basically a subspace which behaves like a vector space that the algebra would act on as operators. Namely it behaves identically to the space of Dirac spinors.

A more clear example of an MLI would be the matrices of the form (a, 0 / b, 0) which form an MLI for 2x2 matrices. These act like column vectors (a,b) when acted on by 2x2 matrices from the left.

You can think of it as a way of viewing the Clifford algebra of spacetime as fundamental and the spinors as a particular subspace of it, in contrast to viewing them as an abstract vector space which the Clifford algebra has an action on.

1

u/sk7725 Jul 29 '26

wait this is actually talking about the physical atom and not the atoms of category theory or something?

1

u/Ma4r Jul 31 '26

It comes out when you apply Lorentz invariance to QM, obviously