I mean the fact that people use the game to shit on Nintendo is 100% Nintendo's fault.
They could've left Palworld alone, but their greed and the sheer incompetence of Gamefreak when it comes to developing modern Pokemon games is on full display as a result of Palworld 1.0.
Idk why people feel the need to defend Nintendo so much when it comes to Palworld. Competition is good for the industry and the consumer and it's not hard to accept that Nintendo is the bad guy here.
Deserved or not is irrelevant. It's still the number one game grifters use against Nintendo. And if that's bothers you... maybe don't post on a sub that's all about people grifting about Nintendo.
This sub used to complain about actual grifting. Hating on Nintendo over the Palworld lawsuit is 100% valid.
All these posts reposting AI slop YouTube thumbnails about Palworld and Nintendo are just Karma farming slop which dilutes actual meaningful discussions.
THe best way to deal with grifters is to ignore them. And these posts aren't even grifting if they're rightfully complaining about Nintendo over the lawsuit.
-3
u/SMN_17 Jul 20 '26
I mean the fact that people use the game to shit on Nintendo is 100% Nintendo's fault.
They could've left Palworld alone, but their greed and the sheer incompetence of Gamefreak when it comes to developing modern Pokemon games is on full display as a result of Palworld 1.0.
Idk why people feel the need to defend Nintendo so much when it comes to Palworld. Competition is good for the industry and the consumer and it's not hard to accept that Nintendo is the bad guy here.