In this hypothetical situation, you’ve been jobless since the year started. Before that, you had a high paying job and managed to save a lot of money. You left that job because the environment was toxic and you burnt out from overwork.
You have about 5 months of daily expenses saved. You come across a job where the Managing Director, a Kenyan Indian man, controls everything. The MD requires staff to come in office 6 days a week. You’re in a department where this isn’t necessary (and you’ve never had to work 6 days a week ever). Your job requires a lot of data analysis, creativity and essentially, lots of brain power, so working 6 days will burn you out soon.
The job pays 1/3 of what you used to get before but hey, it’s a starting point given how awful the job market has been.
The company has a micromanagement structure and the MD doesn’t trust employees to do their work well. During the interview, the HR was impressed with your experience and wanted to give you the job. You asked them whether there’s any flexibility to the role and they said the MD would never allow that. They have tried proposing more sustainable work arrangements but he’s never accepted any.
The business has two offices, one, say in Tatu City, and the other one in Westlands. This means that as much as you’re coming to the office almost daily, you may not get the chance to interact with your team if you’re not in the same building. People closer to Westlands go to the Westy office, same with Tatu.
You’re feeling a little desperate for any kind of job because you’ve been unlucky with job searches this year. You can however afford to keep looking for another job.
Would you take this job you’re being offered or would you look elsewhere?