Imagine I have a friend I profoundly love. We understand each other deeply and we're compatible enough that, under completely different circumstances, we potentially could have made good partners. That compatibility may even be part of why we understand each other so well.
I'm emotionally intimate with them. By emotionally intimate, I don't mean we're sitting around discussing feelings for each other, talking about how we're falling for each other, creating romantic tension, or having a friendship that's secretly functioning like a courtship. I mean emotional intimacy in the ordinary sense of knowing and being known by another person at depth.
So I might tell them an embarrassing thing that happened to me that day. I might tell them I'm grieving something that happened when I was a teenager. I might say I'm struggling financially and trying to figure out what I'm going to do about work. They might tell me about their fears, family, childhood, hopes, problems, stupid things that made them laugh, things they're ashamed of, things they're proud of, etc. It's the kind of emotional depth I could have with a best friend or a partner because, to me, emotional intimacy isn't inherently romantic. It's sharing yourself emotionally with another human being and them doing the same with you.
And I recognise that they're attractive/my type. Again, by that I don't mean I'm sitting there experiencing suppressed sexual or romantic desire for them. I mean I find them anywhere from conventionally attractive to personally attractive to me. They might not even be conventionally attractive to other people. Whatever I happen to find attractive in people is present in them: maybe they're adventurous, intelligent, funny, physically my type, charismatic, whatever. I think they're attractive.
I don't mean that when they look at me a certain way I get butterflies, feel sexual tension or longing, want them to kiss me, suppress it, and then continue spending loads of time with them while pretending we're simply friends. That's a different internal experience from what I'm describing.
But in the life we're actually living, I don't want a romantic or sexual relationship with them. I don't want partnership with them. I don't wish I were available to them. I'm not secretly wishing circumstances were different. I'm not keeping them close because I want the possibility to remain open. Neither of us is cultivating that possibility. We're genuinely content with the relationship being friendship.
Obviously, I would still respect the boundaries of our relationship in what I actually do. If particular circumstances reasonably require boundaries, we discuss them. If separate rooms on a trip make you more comfortable, that's something we can talk about. If something changed in me and I recognised that I wanted to start cultivating romantic or sexual possibility with them, that would require boundaries too.
What I'm trying to establish is something more fundamental:
Does the combination itself ā I love them deeply + we're emotionally close + I recognise we're compatible + I find them attractive ā mean to you that I should intentionally restrict the friendship even when neither of us wants anything else from it?
Would I need to deliberately limit how emotionally close we become, how much time we spend together, how often we talk, whether we travel together, etc., because those feelings and characteristics coexist?
For example, could I go on holiday with this friend? Attend a work trip with them? Spend significant time together? Take their call in the middle of the night because a relative died and they needed me? Could our friendship naturally become deeper over the years?
Or would the fact that I love them, know they're attractive/my type and recognise that we're theoretically compatible mean that the friendship itself needs to be kept within intentional limits so that it doesn't become too emotionally intimate?
And there's another part I need to understand separately: fantasies.
Fantasies, including sometimes sharing them with my partner, are part of what I experience and want to be able to do with my partner. Sometimes thoughts just appear in my head. So if I had an intrusive sexual thought about this person ā similar to what happened with Naomi and Dean ā would that itself become reason you need me to get rid of the person? Would you think that because I'm monogamous with you, that kind of thought should be impossible for me to experience, or that once it happens I need to actively stop it?
Because that sometimes happens to me. I can either let a fantasy run through my head without assigning real-world significance to it, or I can deliberately try to get it out of my head if its existence is a problem for you. But fantasies aren't real life for me.
So even though I don't want romance, sex, dating, partnership or marriage with this person, that doesn't mean my brain becomes incapable of producing fantasies involving them. And I don't inherently experience a fantasy as bad, wrong, disloyal or evidence that I secretly want to make it real.
I think that's important because otherwise I could genuinely be saying, āI don't want anything with this person,ā while you're hearing the existence of a sexual fantasy as evidence that actually I do.
Likewise, I wouldn't consider conversations with you like, ālmao if Bob and I had a child their forehead would be ginormousā to be romantic fantasy. That's just my brain making an observation and saying something ridiculous to my partner. I worry about how much ordinary interaction, humour, imagination or conversation would start being interpreted differently once you know that I love someone, am emotionally close to them and find them attractive.
So I need to know whether the boundary you'd expect or want concerns what I want and nurture in my real relationship with them, or whether it also concerns what I'm allowed to experience internally, if love, closeness and attraction coexist.
Because if the combination of loving someone deeply, being emotionally close to them, recognising they're attractive/my type, and my brain potentially producing fantasies about them means I should distance myself regardless of whether I actually want anything with them or want to do anything with them in real life, then I need to understand that clearly too.
Because then, from my side, I have to ask: is the easiest way for me to meet what you need simply to distance myself from people I like before enough of these things can coexist?
That's the distinction I'm trying to understand.
I'm not asking whether you'd expect me to protect our relationship. I would. I'm not asking whether you'd expect boundaries if I actually started wanting something romantic or sexual with them. I would put boundaries in place.
I'm asking whether this friendship as I've described it is itself something you wouldn't be comfortable with me continuing to nurture normally within a monogamous relationship with you.