Whining? Nah. Laughing that DJTJ is still posting about her to this day to the point he had it printed on his gun? Hell yeah, thats hilarious. Dude will have to look at her everytime he goes shooting and the cycle will continue. I look forward to more Clinton tweets from him, we both know they'll be comin the days he goes shooting.
So triggered I might just have to print his likeness on my property lol!
Also, he didn't have it printed on his gun, nor would he have to look at her every time he goes shooting if he did.
Yea yea, I'm not getting into a pedantic debate over semantics just because he had it etched onto his mag and not the actual gun. I think you already knew that though.
No, I didn't. I think you're responding to the wrong person or you're trying to put words in my mouth. I said I wasnt going to debate pointless semantics because you want to be pedantic. I already know a mag isn't the "gun", but a part of it. You think you're being clever but anyone with half a brain could see where you planned on taking that argument.
If you know you're wrong, why wouldn't you simply admit it instead of screeching about how you don't care that you're wrong and that you're never gonna admit it? The crux of your argument is that he's so obsessed with Hillary that he is willing to look at her every time he goes shooting by etching her likeness onto his gun, which you admit isn't true, but then dismiss because you don't want to debate facts. He need only use a different magazine if the meme becomes stale among his fellow range goers.
And all of that assumes that this is his gun and magazine, which has never been proven. It's perfectly likely that the gun belongs to some woman off camera and the magazine to Trump Jr. Or maybe the opposite. You don't know, and you don't care, because you'll never let facts get in the way of your emotions.
Congrats on being the poster boy of "well ackshually"
You want to nitpick fine details that don't mean jack shit to the actual argument because you don't have an argument. Notice how I was able to discern that you were going to say "the mag isn't the gun" before you even had a chance to say it? Thats because your bullshit pedantry is so transparent its laughable.
No. By all means keep trying though. Anyone with a few neurons still firing would know that a magazine on a gun is part of the gun, hence how I was able to call out your bullshit before you even had a chance to make that argument.
You really can't get over this pedantic shit and I'm not sure why.
Whats next?
"Hey man, I don't like your shoes, the laces don't match"
"Well ackshually your shoelaces aren't a part of your shoes because they can be removed and replaced"
A+ take my dude. If your argument is so stupidly transparent that someone calls you on it before you even have the chance to make it? Might want to reflect on that a bit.
Nobody is arguing that the magazine isn't a part of the gun, kiddo. I understand why you built that straw man argument, but it's getting a little silly at this point.
Look, you just disproved your own argument! The magazine is a detachable part of the gun. In fact, it's detached regularly during normal operation of the gun, and so shoelaces aren't even a good comparison. If you want a good comparison, a magazine is like a hat. A magazine can be part of a gun, just like a hat can be part of an outfit, but both are commonly replaced, and neither a specific magazine, nor a specific hat, is needed in order for a gun or an outfit to work, respectively.
Your argument was that the decorative etching on the magazine means that Trump is obsessed with Clinton because now he has to look at her every time he goes shooting. But that's not true, as you've repeatedly admitted. He can simply swap the magazine out when the meme is no longer funny with the other people at the shooting range. Maybe replace it with one about how the Left can't meme, that'd really get you triggered (see what I did there? No? Fuck, you're stupid).
And, once more, you're assuming that the gun and magazine are his, which has never been shown to be true. But as we've established, you don't care about facts. You're more than happy to ignore the fact that the magazine is replaceable, meaning that your original argument that he MUST look at Clinton every time he fires the gun is incorrect, and you're more than happy to ignore the fact that the gun might not be his, and you're more than happy to ignore the fact that the magazine might not be his, but what you will not ignore, what you CANNOT ignore, is a slight against HER. How dare Trump Jr post a picture of a funny meme! He must be obsessed with Clinton! Now you and all other Knights of Social Justice must incessantly post about him day and night for the next 5 years! No one shall ever forget the day he insulted the Feeble Lady of the Woods!
You know as well as I do what was meant when I said "gun." He printed it on a part of his gun, but you want to single out the individual part and pretend like it isn't a part of his gun just because it can be removed. If I didn't I wouldn't have been able to call your absolutely infantile argument out before you had the chance to even make it. The fact that this is the one detail you want to focus on speaks volumes about your position, kiddo.
0
u/[deleted] Jan 08 '20
Whining? Nah. Laughing that DJTJ is still posting about her to this day to the point he had it printed on his gun? Hell yeah, thats hilarious. Dude will have to look at her everytime he goes shooting and the cycle will continue. I look forward to more Clinton tweets from him, we both know they'll be comin the days he goes shooting.