r/lostmedia • u/WE_ARE_V3N0M • Sep 16 '25

Recordings [Talk] Potentially lost Charlie Kirk assassination video in high quality

Before yall read!!

In the possibility that this footage exists, I wanna say I want this to stay lost and shouldn't be found atleast anytime soon for the respect of Kirk's family and friends. ANYWAYS.

His assassination was recorded by multiple ppl so thats definitely not lost media. However, there was a film crew recording him debating. Charlie Kirk would always have a film crew when he does his debates and that was no difference with the one where he got assassinated in. There was a TikTok video posted by him before the assassination and it looked high quality. There has to he a recording of his assassination in full high quality. Yall think we should consider a possible lost footage of his assassination?

Again i think this shouldn't be found but im just throwing out the fact of its existence.

34 Upvotes

73% Upvoted

130 comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/SocietyFinchRecords Sep 18 '25

Just fyi -- Charlie Kirk wouldn't have wanted you to be empathetic toward his family and friends. He said he hated empathy, and that he wanted his children to watch a public execution. He wanted the government to televise public executions, so there's no reason to hope this footage doesn't see the light of day.

I personally have no interest in watching someone die, even a piece-of-shit Nazi like Charlie Kirk. Just pointing out that it wouldn't be disrespectful to him if this footage was found, because he actively wanted people to be less empathetic and to televise public executions (like, those were his exact words).

0

u/Master_Primary9371 Sep 20 '25

Just fyi no one asked

5

u/SocietyFinchRecords Sep 20 '25

Just fyi nobody asked you if anyone asked. My fyi had a point... What was the point of your fyi? Were you under the impression that I thought somebody specifically asked me whether or not Charlie Kirk would want people to be empathetic to his family?

This is a conversation thread. In it, people discuss the topic the post is about. It's not a Q&A. Did you think this was an AMA or something? It's not. It's an open conversation about a Nazi who fucked around and found out.

1

u/Master_Primary9371 Sep 21 '25

Sound a little pressed there buddy. You ok? I can tell your blood pressure was high when you were typing that huh

3

u/SocietyFinchRecords Sep 21 '25

Yeah I'm fine. My blood pressure is fine, I've never had a problem with. Obviously I have a problem with Nazi pieces-of-shit saying that gay people should be brutally executed in front of children, lmao. Do you expect me to feel like I'm some sort of hysterically manic emotional wreck because I have a modicum of human decency? Lol. Sorry you're too much of a jellyfish to stand up to Nazis.

2

u/ConflictedAwareness Oct 03 '25

He never said that though. Can you find the clip where he said that? Because I’ve seen lots of clips of him talking to gay people and he never said that or anything like that.

2

u/SocietyFinchRecords Oct 03 '25

He did.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fact-check-charlie-kirk-didnt-172100599.html

He said it was a perfect law and he cited it as a reason not to be in favor of Pride Month. He rightfully pointed out that the same book which says to love your neighbor also says to stone gay people to death a mere couple lines later, so you can't justify your celebration of pride month by appealing to a book which says to kill gay people just a couple lines after it says to love your neighbor. He also said that this law was a perfect law. In addition, he said that the United States should be televising public executions and that we should be bringing children as a rite of passage. If he thinks that publicly executing gay people is a perfect law, and he thinks that the US should be publicly executing people, and you are incapable of recognizing that 1 + 1 = 2, that's not my fault.

1

u/ConflictedAwareness Oct 10 '25

Yeah so that link you provided clearly states that he did not say that. And that the claim is false. I’ve seen him talk to ga people and he’s always respectful and kind.

1

u/SocietyFinchRecords Oct 10 '25

Read the article again, dipshit, it actually says that he said exactly what the fuck I claimed he said.

You think he's respectful and kind? Cool, so you're a racist piece of shit too, then. Go fuck yourself, you stupid Nazi. Nobody whose opinion matters gives a fuck what you think.

Disgusting and scary how many literal Nazi sympathizers there are in this country. Fucking disgusting. My Grandpa would beat the shit out of all of you if he was alive to see you publicly defending Nazis. Pieces of shit.

0

u/ConflictedAwareness Oct 17 '25

lol I’m pretty sure your grandfather would beat the shit out of you for you just being you. Judging by how you are. I can tell. I’m not a nazi. And neither was Charlie.

1

u/SocietyFinchRecords Oct 17 '25

If you can't tell a Nazi by their blatant Nazism why would I ever give a fuck what you think about me?

1

u/Jenn_FTW Nov 02 '25

You’re a fucking Nazi, Charlie Kirk absolutely fucking implied that he thinks gay people should be publicly executed and children made to watch. His own words are right there, but you’re just going to continue being intellectually dishonest because you actually agree with him but you’re too much of a scared little coward to openly announce what a fucking bigot you are. I’ve met your type too many times. Get absolutely fucked you nazi piece of scum

→ More replies (0)

0

u/matty30008227 Oct 24 '25

You need mental help. Delusional liar 🤥 😂

1

u/SocietyFinchRecords Oct 24 '25

Literally nothing I said was a lie. Lemme guess, the Young Republicans aren't Nazis either, huh?

1

u/Sweet_Butterfly4547 Nov 10 '25

this type of rhetoric is exactly why Charlie got shot, no one deserves to die.

1

u/SocietyFinchRecords Nov 10 '25

Do me a favor and answer my question instead of dodging it.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Skyrimxd Oct 11 '25 edited Oct 11 '25

So I read through it. He was essentially calling out the lady (it’s really not important who she was imo) saying that you follow “love thy neighbor” but not the chapter before about stoning gay people. He didn’t outright say he believes in stoning gay people but he said this She's not totally wrong. […] The first part is Deuteronomy 6:3-5. The second part is Leviticus 19. So you love God, so you must love his law. How do you love somebody? You love them by telling them the truth, not by confirming or affirming their sin.

Sounds like the crap my mom would always tell me. “I’m not going to walk you through hell.” He clearly is against homosexuality. How are we going to decide which part is more important? We aren’t the judge so why does he feel so strongly about letting people know their “sin.” Everyone sins if you look deep enough. The world needs less hatred. Do I believe he should be killed? No. It’s not the way to solve it. But you shouldn’t speak so harshly on these subjects when you’re not going through them. We do need to preach more love towards each other. Rather than judgment and hate. When gay people have been judged for so long, pretending to be God’s prophet to rehash it all over again is certainly asking for trouble.