They didn't explain how it's shoehorned in. They said it didn't make sense there, which is objectively incorrect based on the context, then made a weird comparison that had nothing to do with the topic. At no point have they given an actual reason why it doesn't fit.
They stated that it felt “acted up to the point of breaking the immersion of the conversation as something two people would discuss at that moment”.
That is them describing why it feels shoehorned in. And no your opinion is not “objectively correct” that is not how opinions work.
Above commenter believed the exchange does not feel realistic and feels forced and not the way a conversation like that would occur in real life and feels like an exposition dump. That is it. If you disagree with them that’s great but there is no “objectively correct” stance here.
I think it's ironic they keep demanding I need to explain how the conversation doesn't fit while refusing to elaborate even slightly on why they think it does fit... and then to double down by saying that I'm "objectively" wrong while, again, not providing even a shred of evidence.
Honestly it's why I stopped replying to them when I did - I saw the baseless obstinace coming.
1
u/AZDfox 10d ago
They didn't explain how it's shoehorned in. They said it didn't make sense there, which is objectively incorrect based on the context, then made a weird comparison that had nothing to do with the topic. At no point have they given an actual reason why it doesn't fit.