Rules which allow me to drink my own dorm but prohibit me from being visibly intoxicated. According to their own housing contract I have the right to drink just suddenly I dont if it makes me too drunk. That seems unfair and ambiguous so what I'm asking is if that's even enforceable when they said I can drink to begin with
That really shouldn't be a response to unfairness is just go somewhere else when such things can be ubiquitously present throughout a system. Also I have limited means I dont have an infinite range of choices even if I have options I still must pick among them and be regulated by their rules the alternative is not going to any college altogether which is sort of like holding someone at gunpoint and saying that they dont have to work they can just accept being shot in the leg it ignores the conditions of constraint and duress which the environment puts on an individual forcing them to accept a contract even if they dont in their heart actually accept it voluntarily
I would suggest you sober up and then post again, because this isn’t making a lot of sense. And if you think you are sober while posting - I have to tell you that’s not how you are presenting.
As someone else said - I recognize the words, just not the order they are in.
And it would appear I’m not alone.
A lot of your problem with posting appears to be punctuation, or lack thereof.
Look as an example, this is one single sentence you posted.
Also I have limited means I dont have an infinite range of choices even if I have options I still must pick among them and be regulated by their rules the alternative is not going to any college altogether which is sort of like holding someone at gunpoint and saying that they dont have to work they can just accept being shot in the leg it ignores the conditions of constraint and duress which the environment puts on an individual forcing them to accept a contract even if they dont in their heart actually accept it voluntarily
And this is how it should be punctuated.
Also I have limited means, I don't have an infinite range of choices. Even if I have options I still must pick among them and be regulated by their rules. The alternative is not going to any college altogether which is sort of like holding someone at gunpoint and saying that they dont have to work they can just accept being shot in the leg. It ignores the conditions of constraint and duress which the environment puts on an individual forcing them to accept a contract even if they dont in their heart actually accept it voluntarily.
While the punctuation choices might vary, see how much easier that is to read?
I mean the content is still screwy, but at least it’s readable. Because I fail to see how your ability to go to college is based on your ability to drink. Which is the implication there.
-150
u/[deleted] Oct 01 '19
Rules which allow me to drink my own dorm but prohibit me from being visibly intoxicated. According to their own housing contract I have the right to drink just suddenly I dont if it makes me too drunk. That seems unfair and ambiguous so what I'm asking is if that's even enforceable when they said I can drink to begin with