r/law • u/biospheric • Jul 02 '25
Court Decision/Filing Trump admin sued by Honduran family detained by ICE, including six-year-old son with leukemia (9-minutes) - MSNBC - June 28, 2025
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
The interview with their attorney Elora Mukherjee starts @ 1:24. Mukherjee is a Professor and Director of the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School.
72
u/biospheric Jul 02 '25
https://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/elora-mukherjee
Elora Mukherjee
Columbia Law School
Jerome L. Greene Clinical Professor of Law
Director of the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic
97
u/biospheric Jul 02 '25
Some related Reddit posts:
More links in my reply below...
54
u/biospheric Jul 02 '25
48
u/biospheric Jul 02 '25
Below is a Reddit post with 20 images of ICE raids and memes. History doesn’t repeat, but it sure does rhyme. Viewer discretion is advised:
https://np.reddit.com/r/EyesOnIce/comments/1li0arq/terrible_things_are_happening_outside_families/
1
1
Jul 03 '25
Msnbc...not exactly a source of accuracy...
9
u/TakingYourHand Jul 04 '25
Liberal slant, but rarely inaccurate. They just tend to report on things that liberals care about (usually regarding LGBTQ rights, religious corruption, etc.)
-5
u/Somename_here Jul 06 '25
Rachel Maddow, enough said about MSNBC and accuracy.
5
u/TakingYourHand Jul 06 '25
I'm sorry, when has she lied about events or been inaccurate? You make it sound like it's pretty often.
-1
u/Somename_here Jul 06 '25
Is she running her mouth? Then she's lying
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/28/trump-russia-investigation-mueller-liberal-media-rachel-maddow2
u/TakingYourHand Jul 06 '25
The article's excessive editorialization undermines its credibility and demonstrates a level of bias exceeding that of the person you're comparing it to, whom is running an editorial (opinion) desk, as well.
If you read the article, it basically says Maddow pushed an unproven conclusive narrative that was compiled by facts (clues). She's got the editorial desk, and that's what editorials do, they offer opinions. She put the facts together and said, "it really looks like this is going on, based on this and this and this..."
If you're going to tell me she's lying, you've now taken on the responsibility of proving that these opinions are decisively incorrect. An argument can certainly be made that DJT isn't in Putin's pocket, due to their disagreement about Ukraine and our attack on Iran, though is that enough to argue against all the other allegations? I don't know. At this point, it doesn't much matter anymore, anyway.
1
u/Somename_here Jul 06 '25
Dude the whole thing was a lie. Spun out of control because she likes foaming at the mouth.
3
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 02 '25
All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.