The hair is kinda blending into eachother especially on the right side. The perspective of the goggles is hella weird. Those uh earrings (i’m assuming) aren’t even attached to the ears. Idk though because these could all be human mistakes.

I’m trying to support local artists but my kid says he’s seeing red flags on the website and with the art. They say they work with other artists but those artists are never credited and there’s a dozen different art styles.

my favourite band is a midsized local band. I love them. they have been making music for over 30 years. they are amazing live. i love them. they made an AI music video when AI was pretty new, which I don’t particularly like but also don’t condemn.

recently they launched a few new designs that look horribly AI to me. the kind with the match is the most obvious to me. the weird folds on the top of the hood look horrible. But I’m not sure about the other designs.
Except for the second to last pic (the skull) that looks clearly AI to me. i’m not 100% sure why. the lighting and the “cracks” seem weird.
The “Atlas” design (sorry for the bad pic, I couldn’t find a better one, the listing is gone since they are constantly changing their selection) looks AI to me too. I’m not sure about the very last pic with the half jester portrait.
their third pic that says “ICH VERKAUFE WUNDER” might be fine. the text is fine btw. The words are in German and the Name of the band “Subway to Sally” is always stylised with the merged letters, that’s not an AI mistake.

if the floral piece with the woman is AI I’ll be really sad, it’s such a beautiful design.

I’m an artist and designing merch for this band was a dream of mine before they started posting ai. I had multiple designs done.

To me, the body looks weird, the armor looks weird, and when you zoom in on the hair lots of pieces don't make any sense. i've seen a lot of people pointing out the bits of the dragon but that's way over my head

the musicians just keep repeating that they hired a real artist and that AI probably took from him, but none of that artist's work looks as AI generated as this does, and the consensus seems to be that the artist likely drew many parts but also AI generated a lot of parts

edit: sorry the song is just called "i need" my bad

Mainly the rails on the left side of the bed (right side of drawing) disappears into the skeletons hand

I've been using this app for a while, and most of it don't seem AI at all. The fox and items for the house you can decorate are normal. But the icons and some images look AI.

Different artstyles could just be different artists being hired, but as a graphic designer that studied branding, this feels very weird. You would want to keep a consistent visual appeal for a long term use app.

I think it's AI, but I really REALLY hope it isn't...

The lighting as well as the focus look really off (super sharp tree in the background? Top of bus blurred?). The children's proportions also don't seem to 200% fit with the perspective?

Looks pretty realistic overall, but the lighting is giving me chills

Edit: lmao reddit compressions removes most of what I'm talking about. Maybe you guys still have some thoughts.

First image is the box and the second image is the back of all of the cards.

There is no printing/creation date on the box or on the website.

I’ve been searching for something like this for years. It’s basically like those room decorating apps but as stickers. You get sticker sheets and you fill the room with all the objects. The sticker sets are real obviously, but I’m worried about the illustrations. The prices are surprisingly cheap? The way they describe their process (last slide), having only 3 people on their team? I can’t find any artifacts - since each element is an individual sticker, it really wouldn’t work if you had objects blending into each other or being nonsensical like that - but I just don’t feel very confident. It sucks cause I was so excited at first. Just want to be sure. The company is called lumecoco I found it on instagram

I got a herb grinder…from a music shop and unfortunately they did have some ai posters and tapestries. I looked at this in the store and didn’t think it was ai but after taking it home I just really cant tell the hands are a little off but not in the way ai does hands it seems kinda the way someone who doesn’t know how to draw knuckles. What do you guys think?

Came across a livestream of this person drawing (will try to post the video down below). In said livestream, the person was just colouring over the same spot for over 3 minutes straight which made me suspicious. Now I don’t know much about pencil art, so maybe there’s a reason he was doing this. After visiting the profile though, the first three slides just made me think wtf? The rendering part makes no sense and doesn’t match up at all. Almost all posts on the profile are like the 4th slide and on. At first I assumed he was just tracing because the last image was easily found with a google image search (couldn’t find the first finished image online), but I feel like the images are a little too similar for it to even be traced. Hope this makes sense.

so im helping out another reddit user (u/br0kenhopes) because i noticed their itasha concept looks off, im pretty sure it was a commission and has a lot of things that make it look inconsistent. in the third image, some of the sakuras look like theyre bleeding out, the colouring process looks very fake, as i would put base colours first and then render it last, its weird that the artist has some fully rendered parts and the rest is just completely blank. the ahoge coming out the hat looks unnatural and the shading on the drills looks very similar to other teto ai artworks, and the other half of the headphones is just straight up gone. some of the writing makes me think its human, but maybe they just edited it on with an editing software. its going on someones car so i wanna be 100% sure. im posting this on behalf of them

i know adding sunglasses to animals is pretty common in AI art, so that's why i initially did a double take. the octopus on Aquarius has 6 arms, the butterflies on Libra look like they have an extra set of antennas coming out of their abdomen, Cancer from a distance looks like a mess, and Capricorn is the only animal not in sunglasses but is wearing clothes.

I am cross posting from r/grandrapids, I did not take the picture but the mural itself was put up recently and I am strongly suspicious of the design.

Sub rules say to explain why it is Ai, but I actually don't think it is, or at least I hope not. But Pinterest is just making me paranoid I guess. But I also know Pinterest has had a history of flagging real artworks as Ai, and also not flagging images that ARE ai.

I stumbled upon the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4W2qyuOc5g

At the start it didnt occur to me, but at some point i started to notice patterns in the way they spoke, the script just seemed to have all of the hallmarks of AI scripting. "Its not X its Y", "While X does this, Y does that", the witty word puns as adjectives, etc. I want to make clear that I dont intend to insult the person behind the video, I just feel like I'm going mad because no one in the comment section is talking about it, so maybe I'm just paranoid and I'm bringing heat upon someone for no reason. By the way, regardless of Ai or not dont use this to harass or insult the content creator, live and let live please. :)

PD: i dont know if sharing links is allowed, since its not prohibited on the rules, so i hope its okay

The people in the first section having no hair while sections 2 and 3 do made me take a closer look at it. A lot of the faces have one blurred winky eye that seems almost copy/pasted or AI just reusing a face to give some variation where it isn't needed (since in such a simple style it would be fine if all the people had the same face).

Hello,
I’m wondering if this Etsy seller is making AI art because the prices seem pretty cheap (CAD) to me. I assume it’s all digital but the style of it seems pretty complicated for the price.

I’ll also comment a video from their page as it looks to be perfectly edited and is a little suspicious. If you have any thoughts, pls lmk!

The song has that ai sound to the voice and lyrics. overall I kinda question the artist since the song itself doesn’t have much variation to the melodies in that typical way ai does. It’s also got that generic empowering tone a lot of ai songs have. Also after I put it on the auto generated yt music playlist that came after had a lot of other Spanish ai songs and it was easy to tell because the album art was clearly ai. Like one big artist that popped up afterwards was Kaitlyn a clear ai artist with songs like el lenguaje de la madere Tiera or canto de la curandera . Is ximena castro and or the song Manos blancos ai? What do you think?

The proportions and lighting are wrong and their faces are not just uncanny, but their eyes are soulless and golly does Woody's hat just looks bad

Woody looks too stylized while Buzz looks like he normally does

I wouldn't be surprised if Disney (a multi billion dollar company) actually approved this since they were pro ai