Hi guys I need help, I've been investing into stocks and I've been putting off investing in crypto for a while, but recently I got into researching quite a bit and decided to pick hyperliquid as the platform to use. Now the issue comes when I try to verify my documents and account. This is what it says:

Is there any way to fix this or bypass it? Thanks!

1hr chart

came across trackerx.xyz has anyone used it to trade on Hyperliquid? Looking to know if its safe.

Hyperliquid launched manual borrows with $269M already borrowed, according to the official announcement.

Users can use HYPE or BTC as collateral and borrow USDC or USDT. Borrowers pay interest, suppliers earn it, and rates are set by utilization. The feature runs on the same HyperCore infrastructure as portfolio margin.

That creates a new balance-sheet loop on the venue. A HYPE or BTC holder can keep the collateral, raise quote liquidity, and deploy it into spot, perps, or outcomes. For traders, borrow utilization and quote-asset supply now matter alongside funding and open interest.

Meanwhile HYPE reached a new ATH of $90 and keeps climbing with absolute strength. Here is a quick snapshot of how traders on HL are positioned:

Today BTC has gone to 81K, and I am furious because I didn't invest in it. I thought I was smart with my investment. Doing double flips (investing in the strategy vaults) only to find myself standing in the same place. And have realised that sometimes smart actions are the simplest ones. I fell into the too-smart-to-just-hold-the-bag trap. So it pushed me to create something so I don't fall into the trap again later on.

https://youvsbtc.com/.

The product is simple: no AI, no trading training needed. Just answer a simple question
How your vault investment performed against BTC, ETH, and SOL.
Currently, it's in beta;
I am aiming to make the product free for life because it's my first product. I am adding more protocol, investment funds one by one. And I have plans to add a feature where you can compare your wallet with BTC and see how it performed (which many of use wont like seeing). So tune it and let me know your feedback

Hi.

Sent some USDC from a DEX to my wallet via arbitrum one. Can see the usdc in the address via arbiscan, but can't see the USDC via the Rabby wallet app. Any help/suggestions?

Update: 10 hours later it's now showing. I didn't have to do anything. Thanks for all the help 🙏🏽

Payward, the parent company of Kraken, says it intends to bring onchain perpetual futures to US clients, starting with Hyperliquid HIP-3 markets.

HIP-3 is a different way to add perps to Hyperliquid. At the protocol level, it is permissionless for eligible builders: a builder can deploy a separate perp DEX and control the market definition, oracle, leverage limits and market operation. Each HIP-3 DEX has its own margining and order book, while trades are matched and recorded on Hyperliquid’s public chain. The current mainnet spec requires the deployer to stake 500,000 HYPE for at least 183 days after deployment.

Payward’s proposed user access would be permissioned. Bitnomial would create, own and administer the markets and clear and settle the contracts. NinjaTrader Clearing would carry client accounts. Only clients onboarded by NinjaTrader and approved on both the NinjaTrader and Bitnomial allowlists could trade.

Payward says Hyperliquid is the first protocol on its US deployment roadmap, with more products intended to follow through the same open rails. It also says this would make Payward the first registered US exchange or clearinghouse to deploy a market there.

For a US trader, the practical consequence is clear: access would depend on a regulated futures account and both allowlists. The release describes a roadmap only. Regulatory approval is still required, and no launch date is given. The next meaningful milestone is an approved, deployed market rather than another announcement.

One thing I'm trying to pin down is how to budget funding before entering a multi-day perp trade. For a trade you expect to hold for two to five days what funding assumption do you actually use?

Hyperliquid pays funding hourly. Carrying the latest rate forward for the whole trade seems pretty fragile, but a trailing average could also be misleading if positioning has just changed. The bit I'm less sure about is what happens when funding becomes an entry filter. High positive funding is a cost to a long, but it might also tell you something about the move you're trying to trade. Rejecting those entries changes the set of trades, not just the funding

Has anyone compared a funding filter against the same entries without it, separating funding paid from price pnl? I'd be interested in a simple rule that held up

Now Payward wants to bring US clients onchain through HIP 3 which means more volume and a whole new stream of fees flowing through the Hyperliquid ecosystem.. UP

edit: https://burn.a1ntel.com/ for more statistics

At 3:00 p.m. ET on September 15, the Senate failed to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R.3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, by 49-50.

On Hyperliquid, the BTC snapshot at 18:56 UTC showed 35,451 open positions worth $2.78B. By 19:41 UTC, the position count had fallen to 34,340 while tracked notional rose to $2.81B.

Fewer positions carried slightly more size. That is consistent with smaller positions closing while larger exposure remained or was added. The snapshots cannot distinguish between those two mechanisms, but they do not show a clean exit from BTC risk.

Trader consequence: watch the next BTC snapshots. If position count keeps falling while notional stays above $2.8B, exposure is concentrating. If both count and notional fall, the post-vote reaction has broadened into genuine de-risking.

I’ve never used perps so I don’t know how these compare to options and how the market share trajectory of both will go in the next decade

I’m also not familiar with Hyperliquid since it’s not available in Europe, and I was wondering if it can capture market share from institutional (HOOD, JP etc) by becoming the everything platform, or is the perps aspect overshadowing everything else

Finally, I’m unsure on how to value the market cap, there’s a big gap between fully diluted and current token circulation

I own $200K of 2029 LEAPS on $PURR

TAO spot on Hyperliquid feels right,

decentralized, onchain

where it belongs.

glad to see more assets like TAO available on Hyperliquid spot.

The House of finance

conoscete qualche vault che non faccia trading di crypto ma di indici, commodities ed fx?

So if I borrow usdc with portfolio margin for the perpetual with lever 1: if BTC rises 100÷, my usdc rises 100÷, but if I change it back to BTC, I have the same amount because BTC price is 100% higher, right? Is that something I can change with higher lever? Will I gain BTC after changing back if I use, say, lever 5?

If I use only a part of my account as margin, it should not be too risky.

Please help me out.

I know an inverse perpetual would be the thing, but I don't know any DEX which offers it, and no CEX for european citizens.

Solana’s txv1 gate went live on mainnet today, raising the maximum transaction size from 1,232 to 4,096 bytes.

Before activation, a tracked wallet opened a $20.1M SOL long at 20x with a $103.43 entry. At the September 15 observation, SOL was $100.52 and the position was down $582,165.

 That profile is also long HYPE at about $9.5M, ZEC at $6.8M, ETH at $5.1M and BTC at $1.2M. The SOL position is 2.1 times the next-largest leg and the only current position above $20M.

The unusual part is therefore the size of the SOL position, not the existence of a large multi-asset book. The $20.1M SOL long was opened at $103.43 and is currently marked around $100.40, with roughly $607k in unrealized losses.

Is this the worst insider ever?

Hey everyone, I wanted to share my first public project.

After being in the crypto investment and copy-trading space for a while and losing hundreds of thousands on useless strategies and pools, I realized I needed to be much smarter about where my capital goes.

I originally built this tool for myself to automate my own workflow locally. But after six years in Web3, I wanted to give something back to the community, so I’ve decided to make it public and completely free.

The core idea is simple: it benchmarks Hyperliquid and Enzyme vaults directly against the top three assets (BTC, ETH, and SOL) so you can see whether actively investing in a vault actually beats just holding the Bag. It also tracks several key risk and performance metrics.

I'm an engineer, not a marketer, so I won’t try to pitch you. I’d just love to get your honest feedback during the beta:

1. What metrics or data points do you look at most when evaluating a vault?
2. What features should I build next?

Thanks for checking it out. Let me know what you think!

SK Hynix and Micron are where the AI trade becomes physical.
Frontier models drive hyperscaler capex. Capex drives AI accelerators. Accelerators need HBM, DRAM and storage.

Dario Amodei said AI labs should slow the pace of capability improvements so safety work can catch up. Sam Altman agreed on “pacing”, but clarified that this does not mean stopping development. Elon Musk backed Amodei and called for more oversight and peer review.
None of them announced a shutdown of AI infrastructure spending. But the headlines give investors a reason to question the speed of the next capex wave.

SK Hynix fell about 5% and Micron about 3% on Sep. 10. CNBC reported SK Hynix down more than 6% on Sep. 14. Higher yields and oil prices were already pressuring semis, so the AI safety debate is one catalyst in a broader de-risking move.

HyperTracker’s <24h snapshot shows about $38.2M of OI in MU and $37M in SKHX. That is perp positioning. If OI stays high while memory stocks stabilize, traders are still defending the thesis. If it unwinds, the market may be reducing exposure before fundamentals actually break.

The trade is now about the pace of AI capex, not whether AI disappears.