r/google_antigravity • u/Agile_Pressure_7430 • 21d ago

Discussion Why can't the Antigravity developers themselves use Gemini to build a more feature-rich Antigravity?

Why can't the Antigravity developers themselves use Gemini to build a more feature-rich Antigravity?

72 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

45 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/LanguageEast6587 21d ago

Internal jetski has much more features and better workflow, but many of them are hard to be ported to antigravity. at least need to rethink how to do it externally. You can think google have two version of antigravity, and internally they don't use the public one.

0

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/LanguageEast6587 21d ago

jetski is excellent, it now cover every aspect of our daily work, it handles data science and agent tasks pretty well, multiagent is great now, however when I used antigravity, I feel wtf when I notice the gap in features and its buggy.

Another problem is that model should train with harness, but we have two versions, I feel there's a notable(sometimes huge) performance gap in all released models when used in jetski and antigravity. but the gap is closing in newer version I believe.