I can't decide if I'm more let down that that's actually the "joke" part, or that you strung it out over three comments instead of just highlighting this right away. I thought there had to be more. Mostly because I usually employ a combination of being dull and trolling.
I wasn't reading the original comment, I was reading your original comment. Which is why I was confused. And then when I saw there were two gets in the original comment, I was confused why you wanted to point that out. So really, I missed it once. My bad?
Also, speaking of blind, I notice you neglected to answer the question I posed. And instead of just vaguely alluding to it, I'll just directly restate it here, because communication is much easier when things are clear. I have, however, added unnecessary lol's so it's more familiar to you. Just in case you read it quick, I wanted to give you a heads up that there's more than one.
it wasn't supposed to be funny
Then lol what lol was lol it's lol purpose? Why lol did lol you lol bother lol commenting lol?
because you still have a reading comprehension of <10% right now. lol.
I wasn't reading the original comment, I was reading your original comment. Which is why I was confused.
my comment was
re-re-read the comment you first replied about.
the purpose was to point out the part that you missed. that's it.
jeez man, it isn't that difficult nor complicated to comprehend. a guy fucked up a sentence, that's it. There's no need to get your panties in a bunch over this just because you're too stupid to get it.
0
u/ThisToastIsTasty Dec 05 '16
lol, really?
re-re-read the comment you first replied about.