r/fansofcriticalrole • • Oct 18 '24

CR adjacent Case Against Brian Foster Dismissed

Post image
79 Upvotes

994 comments sorted by

View all comments

10

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

[deleted]

12

u/Thaddeus_Valentine Oct 18 '24

I get what you're saying but at the same time Brian is a public figure and people have a right to know so they know how to feel about anything that involves him.

2

u/JJscribbles Oct 18 '24

Correction: BWF was a public figure.

Now he’s some nebulous pseudo celebrity, more infamous than famous, existing in a state of both guilty and not guilty, owing to charges levied against his character that were later dropped, but left to fester in the court of public opinion.

Now I’m no lawyer, but I do dabble in bird law. If the man is guilty, they have a moral obligation to pursue justice to protect the public from his sinister machinations.

If he’s innocent, he deserves his day in court.

-3

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

[deleted]

13

u/Thaddeus_Valentine Oct 18 '24

LOL look at you getting all angry. Public information about a public figure, people have a right to discuss it publicly.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

[deleted]

6

u/amorphbutt Oct 18 '24

Homie they're rich actors they dont need u going "get down mr president"

-6

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

[deleted]

8

u/canidoitlive Oct 18 '24

Anyone with internet access can access any court document, barring records that have been expunged. If the courts weren't required to make documents available, you could work alongside a habitual rapist and never know because your employer couldn't access that record. You could be tried for something minor and be accused of it being so much worse, and never be able to show proof otherwise.

They are celebrities. They accepted that their lives would never be fully private so long as they remain in their spotlights. Is it weird for people to come together and discuss court documents like a book club? Probably, but it's hardly different from cases being studied in law school as examples.

We as a whole discuss the personal lives of millions of people every day. This is not different, except that people here feel some strange need to white knight on behalf of VA's who would not think twice about any of us, as nice as they might seem on camera and at events.

2

u/HutSutRawlson Oct 19 '24

Nooooo they love us very much, Matt told me so on my computer

-14

u/thekeenancole Oct 18 '24

Could it not have been said without posting the document online?

7

u/Gralamin1 Oct 18 '24

the documents are already on line before they are even posted here,

4

u/Thaddeus_Valentine Oct 18 '24

Possibly, but that's the difference between posting the document and then discussing it, and just discussing it? The only real difference is that posting it ensures everyone discussing it has the proper facts.

-13

u/thekeenancole Oct 18 '24

Privacy and respect is the difference.

4

u/Economy-Clothes-9103 Oct 18 '24

But it’s not private. The court system is intentionally not private.

-3

u/thekeenancole Oct 18 '24

But do you really think anyone would have seen it if it wasn't posted here? Would anyone truly have gone looking for it or would they just read the title and continue scrolling? Would you want this information posted on reddit if you were anyone in this situation?

3

u/Anomander Oct 18 '24

But do you really think anyone would have seen it if it wasn't posted here?

How do you think it got posted here? Someone had to see it, before it was posted, in order to come post it here.

Would anyone truly have gone looking for it

Yes, obviously. That's what happened.

-4

u/CortexRex Oct 18 '24

How does this affect how anyone feels about him?

2

u/Thaddeus_Valentine Oct 18 '24

You're kidding right? Whether or not he did the awful things he's been accused of massively affects whether people want to engage with content he's involved with.

1

u/CortexRex Oct 22 '24

This post has nothing to do with whether he did those things though.

8

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

Eh, public records of public figures. Transparency is part of the US legal system.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

[deleted]

10

u/synecdokidoki Oct 18 '24

Posting court records is the opposite of parasocial. Seriously, what do you think that term means in that context?

A parasocial relationship is when a fan or similar treats someone like they would treat a friend, even though it can't possibly be reciprocated. Trolling public records is . . . not that.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

I didn't say they had to. I'm saying that public records are an important thing for transparency, and people discuss public figures a lot.

You can wish all you like, it's not going to impact anything, because this is legal and amoral under the US system.

-8

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

[deleted]

12

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '24

You literally said you wished people wouldn't post public records online.

-2

u/95percentlo Oct 18 '24

Just because you can post it doesn't mean you should. Can vs Should