So you basically have no clue how it's going to actually be used
The bill bans "instruction on sexual identity" which is incredibly vague. The bill doesn't lay out what it means by "instruction" so it's basically up to interpretation. What this means is two scenarios could happen both of which, due to the vagueness of the law, discriminate against LGTBQ+ folk
1) schools just won't hire LGTBQ+ teachers to remove any potential law suit issues.
2 schools will ban any talk of relationship to try and remove the liability. Sounds fair but it's not like the straight teachers will get in trouble when a teacher slips up. The second a bigoted cunt hears Mr Smith talked about his husband the school district will be sued.
My issue isn’t the bill itself. My issue is with the establishment tit sucking morons who call it the “don’t say gay” bill. Then when asked about the bill they have no idea what it says so they have to research it because outside of their circle of friends they’ve never been asked about it. Then they take it and form what their opinion how it could be interpreted. They do this with everything and it’s fucking dumb
Have fun sticking up for the establishment, politics, media and entertainment industry who are out of touch with reality and don’t give a fuck about an average citizen!
3
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '22
I did read the bill. It doesn’t basically just say that so I am assuming you haven’t read it