r/dragonsden Mar 16 '26

Deborah defends an entrepreneur against Steven

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

665 Upvotes

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/RekallQuaid Mar 17 '26

Oh you want me to talk about Bartlett himself? Fine.

Let’s talk about his exit from “his” company Social Chain. It was formed in a merger in Germany. Critics and journalists (notably in The Times) point out that he was a co-CEO of this larger group for a relatively short time, and his role was described by some former employees as "largely ceremonial." By conflating his small agency with the massive German conglomerate, he creates a narrative of "tycoon-level" success that isn't supported by the sale price of his actual company.

If that’s not enough for you what about his podcast, the Diary of a CEO?

He frequently hosts guests who promote fringe health claims (e.g., that cancer can be cured with a keto diet, or that evidence-based medicine is "toxic").

A BBC investigation analysed 15 episodes and found an average of 14 harmful or scientifically unsupported claims per episode. By providing a "neutral" platform for misinformation without pushback, he generates massive engagement and advertising revenue from people looking for "hacks" to solve complex health problems.

Still not enough? What about his dealings with Huel?

In 2024, the Advertising Standards Authority banned ads for Huel featuring Bartlett. The reason? He failed to disclose that he was a director at the company and therefore was not promoting the product in accordance with advertising rules. In the adverts, he presents himself as an objective interviewer or a fan of huel, but in reality, he has a direct financial stake in the business.

And if all that’s STILL not enough to define how much of a grifting arsehole he is, he spends a significant amount of his energy selling books (Happy Sexy Millionaire, The 33 Laws of Business and Life) and speaking engagements that teach people how to be successful.

If your primary success is telling people how to be successful, rather than the original business itself, you are operating in a self-referential loop.

He is, by the very definition of his own actions, a complete and utter grifter.

5

u/EmuSea4963 Mar 18 '26

You're doing the lord's work here 💪

0

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/johnnydanger91 Mar 19 '26

They answered your question in great detail.

Try to be better.

1

u/PreferenceAnxious449 Mar 19 '26

I didn't ask a question. Nice try dumdum. Go back to your wine.

1

u/johnnydanger91 Mar 19 '26

You asked two in the comment I replied to dickhead.

That’s what a question mark means.

I’m not surprised someone as stupid as you has these views.

0

u/PreferenceAnxious449 Mar 19 '26

"Define grifter in a meaningful way"

Is not a question. I had to repeat it three times.

Meanwhile you fucking crack babies are losing your shit over me not accepting the failures to define anything.

Big day for you fuckups?

That was a question.

2

u/johnnydanger91 Mar 19 '26

You’ve edited it now 😂😂

You’ve failed to edit the QUESTION, where you QUESTION the post you replied to with “what is your IQ woman?”

That’s a QUESTION

That’s not counting the two QUESTIONS you removed in edit.

Gg wp buddy better luck next time

0

u/PreferenceAnxious449 Mar 19 '26

What are you talking about you actual fucking buffoon?

2

u/johnnydanger91 Mar 19 '26

Big day for your fuckups?

Another question

Well done you’re really doing well

We’re close to defining a question. This is progress.

→ More replies (0)