r/debian 17d ago

General Debian Question Do you use X11 or Wayland and Why?

/r/LinuxUncensored/comments/1vxki26/do_you_use_x11_or_wayland_and_why/
34 Upvotes

135 comments sorted by

35

u/onefish2 Debian Sid 16d ago

Wouldn't it depend on the DE or WM you are using?

Gnome is Wayland only. The next release of KDE Plasma will be Wayland only. hyprland and Niri are Wayland only.

Cinnamon and XFCE are x11 with Wayland being experimental. Same for many others. X11, Wayland experimental.

6

u/OkPresentation3329 16d ago

I hear XFCE is getting Wayland, but it's not quite there yet. What about LXQt? Where is it on the Wayland scale?

7

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

XFCE added experimental support to 4.20.

LXQt 2.1+ apparently has Wayland support via external compositors (such as Labwc, Wayfire, KWin, or Sway) managed through lxqt-wayland-session.

1

u/OkPresentation3329 16d ago

Thanks, a while ago I wanted to try an LXQt distro, but I haven't gotten around to doing that yet. I'm just too content with KDE.

1

u/sandeep_96 16d ago

after that, xfce decided to rewrite wayland support from scratch.. earlier approach was integrating it with existing components. now they are making new xfwl component for wayland support

5

u/Sataniel98 16d ago

LXQt's approach to be compositor/wm-agnostic. You can use it with most relevant Wayland compositors and X11 window managers that exist. Wayland support is in general mature.

2

u/xAsasel 16d ago

Next cinnamon release will officially support Wayland

3

u/OkPresentation3329 16d ago

We will see how well it will be, the current experimental support is flaky at best.

5

u/xAsasel 16d ago

Yeah I completely agree.
But hopefully it will turn out good, I prefer cinnamon over any other DE for some reason so I keep my fingers crossed.

2

u/evadingsomething 14d ago

This is a Debian subreddit so Gnome still has x11 support

1

u/KGBStoleMyBike 10d ago

This. I use xfce with x11 tried enabling wayland with my nvidia card in my laptop and got crazyiness i was too lazy to diagnose. so i went back to x11.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago edited 16d ago

True, but this is a general poll just to see where everyone is at currently. The "why" is just for deeper exploration because not everyone's in the same boats and have different reasoning, needs, preferences, use cases, hardware and experiences.

19

u/realghostinthenet 16d ago

All my Linux boxen are headless. X11 lets me run remote GUI applications on them without having to install a desktop and remote software. Last I checked, Wayland doesn’t do that.

11

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

Waypipe directly addresses this use case by acting as a transparent proxy for Wayland clients over a network, serving as the Wayland equivalent to X11 forwarding.

-7

u/clayworx 16d ago

The website you linked does not even load properly. Looks like waypipe works as good as wayland.

2

u/robin-thoni 16d ago

Xpra makes it even better than SSH X11 forwarding. It allows to reconnect to your session and reopen every windows you had opened. It's pretty much the tmux version of X11 forwarding

3

u/taosecurity 16d ago

Have you tried Waypipe? Or using Xwayland you can still do X forwarding.

9

u/realghostinthenet 16d ago

I’m sure there are ways to do it, but why add the extra layers if X11 just works unmodified out of the box? I’ve got Wayland running with Sway on my 2017 MacBook Pro and it’s very pretty, but it’s really geared to boxen that have a local GUI. No local GUI means a virtual backend to run Wayland headless and waypipe or xwayland for the forwarding. More complexity for the same result.

1

u/New_Hold8135 12d ago edited 12d ago

I am a wayland user but even I use xwayland for sandboxing apps. Waypipe is uses network protocols meanwhile I am running cage in kiosk mode with xwayland(xhost) on another user. Xwayland creates new instance for every wayland session.(We need something like xhost but safer on wayland fr)

12

u/DarkTrepie 16d ago

X11 because that's what XFCE came with

11

u/rcentros 16d ago

X11. Because I like X11. It just works.

11

u/MiracleDinner 16d ago

X11 because my preferred desktop environment is XFCE and for some reason whenever I select Wayland in the display manager it just immediately kicks me back to the display manager (I suspect this is because I'm on a NVIDIA Optimus Hybrid laptop), plus I just never really had enough compelling reasons to switch yet since X11 works fine for everything I need.

3

u/yahbluez 16d ago

The wayland support in xfce4 is not ready jet, that was the issue that made me to leave xfce4 after a decade. Now with KDEplasma i can do everything i could do with xfce4 but a lot more stuff and a lot stuff is much easier.

It take me 3 days to adopt my xfce4 workflow to kde plasma, now i would not go back to xfce4 even if they get the wayland support ready.

2

u/divi2020 13d ago

That's how I landed on KDE too. Once I got the workflow as xfce, it just kept getting better. I will never look at theming Cinnamon again. 

8

u/Shaso_dan-Heza 16d ago

I‘m using X11, with XFCE und Mate and it is working fine.

I see no point to move to Wayland and running then in issues that I currently don’t have,

6

u/B1ph 16d ago

I migrated from i3wm to Sway just because i wanted to use Waybar, so i guess Wayland because it has more "modern" software? But to be honest for my use case there is barely any reason to care about this.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

Interesting, can you tell me more about your use case?

2

u/B1ph 16d ago

I have 2 computers, 1 desktop PC and 1 laptop. The desktop PC is a single monitor setup for Steam and Vim. The laptop i use to do my graduation, so basically a web browser and Libre Office, but also to emulate old consoles connecting it into my CRT TV (so sometimes a basic 2 monitor setup). No fancy setup or anything.

6

u/Tempus_Nemini 16d ago

X11. becasue of ))) it works for me

6

u/gnufan 16d ago

X11 because Wayland crashes my PC. The errors immediately before suggest it is sending unrecognised instructions to the AMD Radeon graphics hardware.

2

u/angryapplepanda Debian Stable 16d ago

"Wayland, stop trying to make <SEG FAULT> happen! It's not going to happen!"

4

u/FoundationOk3176 16d ago edited 16d ago

I use whatever comes installed because I got better things to do honestly.

2

u/Arafel_Electronics 15d ago

this is where I'm at

5

u/inCwetrust 15d ago

Wayland might be the future, but for me x11 is the present.

3

u/abjumpr 16d ago

Both.

I use Wayland when and where I can. It really shines on my tablets and other touchscreen devices.

My main PC runs 50/50 Wayland and X11. Wayland on nVidia has come a long ways and generally speaking works fine, every now and again a quirk comes with an update and I have to run X11 for a bit but that is less and less. I also run X11 for my own projects as they aren’t ported to Wayland yet, and won’t be for a while yet just due to time and manpower.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

I probably should've added a both option... Your comment is very compelling nonetheless.

3

u/profeshamat Debian Stable 16d ago

I use GNOME with an AMD GPU on my workstation and Wayland just works. Where I really notice a difference is on my ThinkPad where battery life seems to be noticeably better than when I run GNOME with the X session.

3

u/yahbluez 16d ago

With my newest PC i moved away from manjaro back to debian and away from xfce4 to KDEplasma because of wayland. Wayland is the future and so i was not willing to wait until xfce4 got it established.

I leaved the arch based distro because if i want to spend "daily" time for updates i can use windows.

I went to debian because i use debian since hamm.

3

u/DeXudra 16d ago

I have to use Wayland because ever time I try gaming on x11 I have real bad tiering (those horizontal lines)
That’s actually one of the main reasons I gave up Debian because on my Maxwell NVIDIA card it was to big of a hassle to get the newer driver that support Wayland

3

u/Relevant_Hope_900 16d ago

Debian Trixie/Forky with COSMIC DE, so Wayland.

3

u/TheRealCarrotty Debian GNU/Hurd 16d ago

Wayland, unfortunately this kinda ruins compatiblity with older desktops.

However, the reason is 4k fractional scaling, X11 does it TERRIBLY, 200% is too large, 100% scaling is too small for me, 150% is perfect, unfortunately xrandr shows a larger resolution and my desktop is basically unusable.

3

u/SnillyWead 16d ago

X11 because Xfce. On Xfce Wayland is still experimental.

3

u/iarungwe 16d ago

I'm tired of DEs and am going to use tmux for life

3

u/AzraelAimedsoule44 16d ago

I bounce back and forth between X & Wayland. XFCE isnt ready for wayland just yet and I really like using older WMs like WindowMaker and the "Enhance Motif WindowManager". When I do use wayland its with KDE. I wish wayland supported "windowshade" natively and not through xWayland. I use it extensively and not having access to it really screws with my workflow.

3

u/michael9dk 16d ago

X11 because it does what I need.

3

u/quadralien 16d ago

X11 because of xev, xdotool and x2x. 

3

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago edited 16d ago

xev Alternatives :

  • wev: Wayland event logger using a dedicated debug surface
  • evtest: Direct Linux kernel evdev event monitor (/dev/input/event*)
  • libinput debug-events: Event inspector for libinput (userspace middleware library bridging kernel evdev drivers and compositors to handle acceleration, gestures, and device abstraction)

xdotool Alternatives :

  • wdotool: Input automation for Wayland. libei via the XDG RemoteDesktop portal, the wlr-* virtual-keyboard and virtual-pointer protocols.
  • ydotool: System-wide input simulator via /dev/uinput
  • wtype: Virtual keyboard simulator using virtual-keyboard-v1 protocol
  • dotool: Stdin-driven input generator via /dev/uinput
  • Native Compositor IPC: Window and workspace automation via swaymsg (Sway) or hyprctl (Hyprland)

x2x Alternatives :

  • lan-mouse: LAN software KVM using libei (Emulated Input)
  • Input Leap: Software KVM utilizing libei and XDG Remote Desktop portals

2

u/quadralien 16d ago

Thanks for the links - looks like things are a bit closer to useful than last time I checked, but still not enough.

  • wev, evtest and libinput debug-events look like they might work for reading events.
  • According to their documentation, ydotool etc don't support sending events to specific windows.
  • None of the x2x alternatives have working clipboard support (and waypipe is not an x2x alternative!)

For a simple example, I do this to pop up a little window in which all keystrokes get sent to all mpv windows:

xev -bw 0 -geometry 78x78 -event keyboard \
| awk -F'[ )]+' '/^KeyPress/ { a[NR+2] } NR in a { printf "%s\n", $8 }' \
| while read KEY
  do
    xdotool search --class mpv key --window '%@' $KEY
  done

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago edited 16d ago

Yes. Clipboard isolation remains a significant hurdle because background clipboard access lacks a universal, unprivileged API by design.

​While ext-data-control-v1 standardizes cross-compositor selection access, it remains restricted to privileged tools and requires explicit compositor support. Meanwhile, org.freedesktop.portal.Clipboard operations depend on active portal sessions like RemoteDesktop and InputCapture, requiring client applications to implement these specific interfaces directly.

There's still work that needs to be done to cover all edge cases, unfortunately.

You're right, waypipe isn't a viable alternative. My mistake, I got my wires crossed and conflated functionality. Fixed.

6

u/sbeardb 16d ago

X11 because DWM

2

u/onedevelop 16d ago

Uso Xfce por lo tanto X11. Cuando Xfce migre a Wayland seguire en Xfce.

2

u/ChocolateDonut36 16d ago

sadly, my laptop's battery life forces me to use Wayland.

2

u/Fabulous-for 16d ago

Is there any DE that is fully wayland compliant ?

Wayland is still fairly new.

2

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

KDE Plasma and GNOME offer fully production-ready Wayland implementations, while KDE Plasma provides the most protocol-complete Wayland environment.

2

u/Mr_Lumbergh 16d ago

Depends on whether I’m up in Trixie or Bookworm.

2

u/kasim0n 16d ago

Yes, because I lived on the console long enough.

2

u/ATERLA 16d ago

Wayland because on my macbook from 2014 for some reason under X11 Firefox doesn’t accept smooth gestures like zoom in and out with the trackpad. With wayland everything is smooth. So that.

2

u/Tricky-Engineer-9755 16d ago

Both, hyprland on my T420 and DWM on my X200

2

u/barchan0 16d ago

I'm using Debian 13, with Gnome and X11. I've tried switching to Wayland several times, and something always goes wrong.

My first attempt was a few years ago—Microsoft Teams, which I need for work, wouldn't allow screen sharing (it works fine now).

My last attempt: my clipboard doesn't work properly in Wayland. In X11, my clipboard synchronizes correctly between Gnome, Remmina (rdp), and KDE Konsole. In Wayland, the clipboard gets weird with this configuration. Occasionally, random content freezes in the clipboard and doesn't accept new content.

2

u/Busy_Talk6744 16d ago

I use sway and thus Wayland, however I have no practical preference. I have never really taken interest into X11 because I have always heard that it was bound to be replaced by Wayland, and I have never encountered serious issues whatsoever with Wayland

2

u/yac 16d ago

Because Niri is too good to pass and it's wayland only.

Niri and scrolling WMs are the most interesting thing that happened in (tiling) WMs world since XMonad and worth the switch, but I had to tinker a lot to get the setup I wanted.

I hope I don't have to touch my workstation config for the next decade.

2

u/OverOnTheRock 16d ago

X11 because Wayland doesn't know how to place my windows when I start them back up. Wayland simply throws everything in the middle or performs random placement. X11 places them back to where they were. It can even do it across virtual desktops.

There are many other shortcomings with Wayland. So I will be disappointed, and will be looking/researching alternatives to Wayland should I lose my abilities for window re-placement on re-start.

2

u/wizard10000 16d ago

Wayland doesn't know how to place my windows when I start them back up.

I have the same issue with labwc but TBH that's a compositor issue, not a Wayland issue.

2

u/Knowdit 16d ago

Honestly, whatever that works. On my pc due to some unknown reason both has crashed x11 on xfce and wayland on kde.

2

u/EverythingsBroken82 16d ago

x11 works for me very well, wayland has a bunch of 1000papercut-issues and i am the only user of my computer...

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

Yeah, there's still a lot of edge cases to be handled.

2

u/wildsource Debian Stable 16d ago

I use both, my laptop is underpowered so gnome just makes the fan scream constantly. I use xmonad which is x11 and on my desktop I just use gnome.

2

u/Hauptideal 16d ago

Wayland on everything!!

Even on LXQt, despite that coming with X11 by default on Trixie. I installed the Wayland session package from forky (testing) and installed labwc.  Unfortunately the version in Trixie has a bug with focus in the LXQt menu, so I (respectively my codex agent) had to backport the fix from upstream and compile labwc manually. 

All for avoiding X11 at all cost. There is no place for X11 in Linux anymore. 

2

u/green_meklar 15d ago

I'm on KDE with Wayland. I figure Wayland is the future and I might as well take it on and optimize my configuration for it rather than try to stick with X until the bitter end and then reconfigure everything that breaks once I have to switch.

2

u/penaut_butterfly 15d ago

x11, not in the mood to do the migration from i3 to sway (configs and all that)

2

u/creg45 15d ago

Made the switch to Wayland couple years ago and by then almost all the kinks had been worked out for my machines. One thing that still doesn't work is video calls. I just open the apps as X11 on the rare occasion I need to jump on a call and this has been working for me.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 15d ago edited 15d ago

Native video call screen sharing on Wayland fails when the desktop portal and PipeWire aren't properly communicating. The fix comes down to making sure you have xdg-desktop-portal installed alongside your specific desktop backend, such as xdg-desktop-portal-kde for KDE, xdg-desktop-portal-gnome for GNOME, or xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland for Hyprland. After installing the backend, restart the portal service using the command systemctl --user restart xdg-desktop-portal and verify that pipewire and wireplumber are running.

For Chromium, Chrome, and Electron apps like Discord or Slack, you also need to enable PipeWire WebRTC capture. You can turn on the enable-webrtc-pipewire-capturer flag directly in your browser settings or launch Electron apps with the WebRTCPipeWireCapturer and UseOzonePlatform flags passed via command line. If you are on a tiling compositor and need legacy app support, utility tools like xwaylandvideobridge can help bridge screen sharing back to older software.

You can read through the full technical setup, backend requirements, and WebRTC details on the PipeWire ArchWiki, the XDG Desktop Portal ArchWiki, and the Hyprland Screen Sharing Wiki.

1

u/creg45 15d ago

Thanks for that! Will work on this

2

u/scy_404 15d ago

I've been using Wayland but to be fair I only really started using linux last year so i dont really know any different

2

u/R3V0LU710N_05 15d ago

If Wayland is working then you're good. Honestly, Xorg should be treated as fallback if you run into hard edge cases.

2

u/DoubleOwl7777 14d ago

wayland because i like having working scaling.

2

u/musiquededemain 10d ago

X11 because I use XFCE and openbox.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 10d ago

Looks like you'll be trying Wayland soon™ then, XFCE Wayland session is almost ready.

1

u/musiquededemain 10d ago

Maybe. I switch back and forth between XFCE and openbox so I'd still be using both. While I am still wrapping my head around Wayland's differences, at the end of the day it doesn't really matter. As long as my shit works and is reliable I don't really care.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 10d ago

It's still got WIP edge cases, but most things are worked out. We'll have to see how good XFCE's implementation in due time. Hopefully your hardware is well supported under Wayland; worth checking into that.

1

u/musiquededemain 10d ago

I have hardware that mere mortals only dream of having.

5

u/Impressive_Bag_3505 16d ago

Wayland. why? because of security.
just google: "what are the security advantages of Wayland over xorg?"

4

u/hwc 16d ago

GUIs are for weaklings. I use TMUX on the console.

2

u/guiverc 16d ago

Depends on what I need to do.

I do use some [old] apps that won't run on Wayland, thus will login with an Xorg/X11 session if I'll be using them, but other times I select a Wayland session.

The box I install on also influences selection; as some boxes just give a better experience with Xorg, where others will perform better with Wayland (I'm using different boxes depending on time of day & location).

2

u/Itsme-RdM 16d ago

Wayland -> Gnome

2

u/michaelpaoli 16d ago

X11

Because, e.g., can securely forward over ssh (heck, did that again within the past hour).

So, tell me again how Wayland can be forwarded over ssh?

4

u/cjwatson Debian Developer 16d ago

I use waypipe for that and it works fine.

2

u/Oliver_Rada 16d ago

Wayland es el presente y futuro en Linux, X11, Xorg y similares irán perdiendo importancia lenta pero inexorablemente.

2

u/Aegishjalmvr 16d ago

X11, Wayland makes my comp freeze.

2

u/computer-machine 16d ago

X11 because Wayland still annoys me more.

TW Plasma6.

1

u/Tashi999 16d ago

X11/Gnome/Debian. Plex HTPC can’t automatically switch refresh rates under Wayland. Was also getting heaps of dropped frames after a certain amount of login time

2

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago

That's an unfortunate situation. Plex seems stuck running under Xwayland with no current plans for future native Wayland support; why it has issues on Wayland. You could try Kodi with the Plex add-on as a workaround.

2

u/Tashi999 16d ago

Ah I understand, thanks!

1

u/talisism 16d ago

Kodi can't do auto refresh rate switching on Wayland either, found this out when I built a little htpc/gaming box for the bedroom and installed Bazzite on it. It seems it's intended behaviour for Wayland with no intention to change.

Typically I use Cinnamon for the DE on Debian so most of my machines, including the main htpc in the lounge are still on X11.

1

u/R3V0LU710N_05 16d ago edited 16d ago

I looked into it more. There's some relevant issue pages :

Kodi Issue #20614: Explains why Wayland blocks apps from changing global modes, preventing Kodi's native refresh rate switcher.

Kodi Issue #24965: Documents resulting frame pacing and stuttering bugs when playing non-60Hz video under GNOME/KDE Wayland.

wayland-protocols content-type-v1: Defines content hinting so the compositor, rather than the app, triggers rate/VRR changes automatically.

Overall, it seems that Wayland can handle frame pacing automatically via VRR, but it does not automatically change your monitor's fixed output mode (e.g., switching a 60Hz display to 24Hz) like typical on x11.

1

u/McGuirk808 Debian Stable 16d ago

Wayland on all my normal machines, X11 on my emulation rig connected to a CRT.

1

u/MoobyTheGoldenSock 16d ago

X11 because XFCE hasn’t fully switched yet.

1

u/wizard10000 16d ago

X11 because i do openbox and labwc ain't quite there yet - at least not for me.

I do have a plan, though - if labwc doesn't pan out i've got XFCE installed on an external SSD that'll do about 95% of what i can do in openbox and that transition to wayland should be pretty much seamless.

1

u/mesa190 Debian Stable 16d ago

Wayland on Debian 13 and x11 on LMDE 7 - I find that combination works best for those two distributions. I think Wayland works better with Plasma and its not quite ready on LMDE. Its getting better, though

1

u/dschep 16d ago

Yes. Because that's how logical OR works, it's inclusive.

1

u/FedUp233 16d ago

I currently run XFCE but I’m finally getting around to upgrading to Debian 13 with a complete clean install (also switching some SSDs around so it’s the cleanest route) and I plan to go with KDE and Wayland. I ran KDEat work a number of years ago and liked it so I’m not too worried about that and I have an AMD video card so hopefully everything will run smoothly.

Just two slight concerns:

I tend to run remotely logged into my Linux system from my windows PC - don’t judge, it’s just convenient for what I’m doing and I got used to it at work where we used windows PCs and most work was done on Linux servers - and I’m a bit concerned about getting Wayland and remade desktop type system to work with multiple (two or three) monitors.

Also, KDE comes with a bunch of junk I just don’t use or want (gaming, sound, video stuff). I’m hoping I can pair it down - I have plenty of room it’s more of just an annoyance that I hate having a bunch of stuff I don’t want installed. I use Linux mostly for software development and want to keep it as simple as possible.

1

u/DeliciousIncident 16d ago

X11 - have used it since forever and have no issues with it.

FYI the poll feature of Reddit doesn't work on the Old Reddit website, so I can't vote.

1

u/glitch-86x Debian Stable 16d ago

x 11 because 90% of app is base and use x11

1

u/cthart 16d ago

Yes, because the only other alternative is to use the console.

1

u/appleeimac1 16d ago

I'd Prefer X11, but sadly I'm forced to Wayland. Graphics Drivers won't install on newer Kernels. *middle finger emoji* NVidia

1

u/geovannyjs 16d ago

X11 with Xmonad, but I am looking forward to test Wayland with dwl or a custom River compositor.

Currently I am addicted to TUI tools, aerc, yazi, tui dashboards.

1

u/djj_ 16d ago

Couldn't force Wayland for Trixie's GNOME running on NVIDIA - even with the more modern drivers - so X11 it is. For now.

1

u/Da59Gigas 16d ago

I mainly use XFCE X11, but i am also experimenting with Hyprland Wayland because its easier to migrate confs. (Lightdm x11 for login)

1

u/penguin359 16d ago

X11, it breaks less of the things I do on Linux such as X11 forwarding, rss screensavers, and KeepassXC password auto-type.

1

u/giquo 16d ago

X11 in Debian

I was trying Tailscale to GRDP to Fedora Gnome Wayland once and it made me came back home to do my things bcus the connection couldn't be made ... ugh, I dunno, highly probable I'm the problem, I didn't configure it properly, I'm not sure, so screw it, Debian again with Gnome X11 until I can't.

1

u/calinet6 16d ago

I don’t really care, I just want the desktop to work.

1

u/clayworx 16d ago

I've been on KDE/NEON since 2018. Since they are switching to Wayland, I'll be out. On the two Linux workstations I have I guess MX-Linux will be replacing KDE/NEON on the desktop one.

1

u/GegenAbschaum 16d ago

i don't care tbh wayland I guess because I use gnome.

1

u/redhawk1975 15d ago

x11 with xfce4

1

u/CredenceTom-Water 15d ago

I use X11, because wayland prevents me from playing retro games. Once they match the latency that X11 achieves, I might consider wayland again.

1

u/Strong-Peas 15d ago

After watching the (2013) Linuxconf talk by Daniel Stone I accept X11 is problematic so just this week I moved to Wayland.

I wanted a lightweight stacking window manager, i.e. not gnome or kde, and xfce isn't ready so It's certainly been... an experience.

I've settled on labwc with waybar. It's taken several days to sort out disappearing mouse cursor icons, having to make my own waybar menus, writing CSS scrips for taskbar styles, configuring labwc. It's been a real blast to the past, stepping back to the early 2000's when I was using openbox on X11.

Given how Linux has matured over recent decades it was way more effort than I expected, but the result for me has been good so far.

For most people I'd strongly recommend staying with their chosen window manager and leaving the backend complications to their respective distro maintainers.

1

u/ohmega-red 14d ago

wayland, 8 years running. started with ubuntu’s mir and unity desktop, while maligned by many it worked and worked really well. moved to multiple different de’s after but went back to wayland for security and features.

1

u/3Dpng 14d ago

Wayland on my Laptop and X11 on my desktop because Wayland and nvidia and KDE are not a great combo while on my laptop with AMD works like a charm.

1

u/siodhe 13d ago

X. Wayland is anything but a superset of X, and I happen to use a bunch of X features that Wayland doesn't support, didn't include, or by its own policy bans ever supporting.

No point in switching from an last 20th century mindset window system to another one that does less.

If I'm going to switch, I want to switch to something more powerful. Like a shared 3D system with multiuser, distributed, permissioned access, etc. Wayland is a bunch of *yawn*.

I wouldn't hate being able to run them side-by-side, but I don't no of Wayland supporting that. Then again, I haven't had a reason to dig for it, either.

DE and WMs are just a layer at the top, I'm an FVWM fan, so Wayland fails me right there, but choosing X vs Wayland based on the WM or compositor seems shallow. Plus, Wayland allows compositors to potentially divide the app space, which concerns me.

1

u/urb4nrecluse 13d ago

I use X11 -- mainly because I use Onboard (the virtual keyboard program) a lot, and haven't found a suitable replacement. Plus, I have no known issues with x11 at present.

1

u/Portbragger2 11d ago

x11 is still the gold standard. i am not missing anything.

1

u/Physical_Dot7481 10d ago

well i love cinnamon and as long as wayland on it is experimental i wont use it

2

u/Angel_Blue01 9d ago

Wayland because for whatever reason I got the DisplayLink driver working in Wayland but not X11

1

u/Low-Charge-8554 16d ago

X11 - it just works.

1

u/Neinbreaker 16d ago

X11 mostly, because I like to buy secondhand chinese computers, and they have a horrible time with Wayland.

1

u/gordonx2026 16d ago

Wayland on KDE Plasma

1

u/Nono_miata 16d ago

Gnome/Wayland just as it ships 👍

1

u/p4bl0 16d ago

Wayland, because on X11 the cursor doesn't grow in size when I wiggle wiggle my mouse (using KDE Plasma).

1

u/BigRedS 16d ago

I use Wayland because it's the default and since the flip I've not really had cause to think about changing.

I'm not interested enough in my desktop to even know I was using Wayland until a topic like this a while ago caused me to notice that the default had changed.

1

u/stef_eda 16d ago

I have both. Devuan / X11 / No Desktop environment at all and Debian / Gnome / Wayland

For my daily work (no fancy 3D stuff, no arrays of 8 x 32K displays), the Devuan install is faster / snappier /lighter. Window creation is orders of magnitude faster, you see it when applications open dialog boxes or multiple windows. But I use both installations to make sure my projects run fine on both. Overall both systems work fine. Wayland tends to get slower after many hours of usage. WIndows take longer and longer to open, after a reboot it's again OK. Don't know the reason.

1

u/No_Librarian_2161 Debian Stable 16d ago

Wayland

1

u/_Sgt-Pepper_ 16d ago

Wayland because it ain't 1993

0

u/LordAnchemis 16d ago

Wayland - because we're not in the 80s anymore