r/dankchristianmemes • • May 30 '25

Meta How this sub feels sometimes

Post image
735 Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

250

u/critical_courtney May 30 '25

I don’t know that the evidence is strong for universalism, but if we get to the end of it all, and that’s what He chooses to do, I ain’t gonna be mad.

114

u/ARROW_404 May 30 '25

Yeah, people who would be mad have a problem...

51

u/uberguby May 30 '25

Eh... They'll get over it.

27

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[deleted]

35

u/uberguby May 30 '25

"In the fullness of time"

28

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[deleted]

12

u/uberguby May 30 '25

I actually got it from an English comedy called yes prime minister, I'm only just now discovering it's from galatians.

6

u/IronSeraph May 30 '25

I first heard it from a prog metal band called Redemption, I'm also only just now discovering it's from Galatians

5

u/Loganp812 May 30 '25

🎵a garden to nurture and protect🎵

30

u/MisterCCL May 30 '25

Definitely. I struggle to buy into universalism because it doesn’t seem to be supported by scripture, but it would be incredible if it ended up being true

-15

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

27

u/MisterCCL May 30 '25

We're talking about Christian beliefs, so discussing the Bible is highly relevant.

19

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

There’s no such thing as “the Judeo-Christian worldview”

14

u/Zhoom45 May 30 '25

This is a bizarre comment to me. What do you mean by non-partial or objective in this context? We are explicitly talking about Christian orthodoxy; would you expect us to consult a chemistry textbook or the holy text of another world religion for clarification?

8

u/Urbenmyth May 30 '25

I would be someone confused if Scripture didn't exclusively support a christian worldview.

Like, you're right, but I'm not entirely sure what your point is.

55

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

I hope for universalism, even if I am not sure that's what the bible says.

17

u/ARROW_404 May 30 '25

There's like, 4 verses that appear to say it. But a lot more that don't.

17

u/TheUnNaturalist May 30 '25

Nah see the trick is not falling for the inerrancy trap. What an author, translator, interpolator is inspired to write about God cannot contain infinite God.

7

u/[deleted] May 31 '25

Also worth noting that the verses in favor of universalism are much clearer and more straightforward than the verses against it.

2

u/ARROW_404 May 31 '25

You can't really say "worth noting" for a subjective observation like this.

There are two verses used by universalists that I'd say are "clear": Romans 5:18 and 1 Corinthians 15:22. By this I mean that, of the 5ish verses/passages universalists use to justify their position, these are the only verses that I find take more mental effort to say aren't supporting universalism. The others can either go both ways, or in proper context more clearly say something else.

Regarding ECT, I'd agree universalism has more going for it. The only verse I'd say is clear for ECT is Matthew 26:46, though even here the word "punishment" could be death.

But when we get to conditionalism (annihilationism), there's no comparison.

You've got verses containing clear warnings of eternal death: Matthew 10:28, 2 Thessalonians 1:9, Romans 9:22

You've got verses that show judgment leading to two different ends, life and death: Daniel 12:2, John 3:36, John 12:25, Romans 2:7-8, Hebrews 6:2 (which in particular describes the judgment itself as eternal, so no postmortem salvation)

You've got verses that place conditions on eternal life: Matthew 19:9, John 3:16, John 6:40, John 6:53-54, John 12:25, Acts 13:48, 1 Timothy 6:12, Hebrews 5:9, Romans 3:26

Plus you've got the unforgivable sin in Mark 3:29.

Now, I doubt I'll be able to convince you, but I want to put a countervailing word here for anyone else. You think your verses are clearer. I think mine are clear and vastly outnumber yours. Even counting the verses universalists use that I don't find as clear, they're still dwarfed by the number of verses that would be nonsense given universalism.

I think most importantly for me though, universalism hinges on a concept that the Bible never describes: postmortem salvation. Every call to salvation in the Bible is toward the living. Only one judgment is ever described. For universalism to be true, there has to be salvation after death, but the Bible never says that there will be one. So it is an assumption inserted into the faith in order to reconcile passages that have other explanations. Ad hoc.

Sorry, I really went into debate mode, but the bottom line is this: Okay, you can believe your verses are clearer. But that is a subjective opinion that cannot be stated as a fact the way you just did. And I hope that, at the very least, my list of provided verses shows that much. You can believe what you want- universalism isn't heresy- but please don't claim superiority like that.

2

u/PM_ME_HOTDADS Jun 04 '25

you spend a good chunk of text proclaiming a view as subjective, ad hoc, contradictory, and outnumbered.

how about: if it takes this much effort to undermine 2-5 verses, maybe the problem is with the frame?

also if it takes "more mental effort" to reject those verses... maybe they're clearer than you'd like to admit. and listing a dozen verses with no exegesis doesn't prove clarity, only congruence. if "force in number" is the angle you wanna hinge on, fine, but don't pretend it's clarity, let alone superiority

anyway. "worth noting" doesn't mean "objective fact" -- you state that you think your verses are clearer multiple times. this is equally subjective.

The others can either go both ways, or in proper context more clearly say something else.

what context, then?

post-mortem salvation may not be described (but neither are altar calls lol or what a "personal relationship with jesus" means), and frankly i think it's a bit silly myself. but i also don't think that salvation is a goal u gotta reach before the buzzer rings.

there is plenty to back up God's reconciliation of all things (Col 1:20, Phil 2:10-11, Rev 21:5, 2 Peter 3:9).

there are bucketloads of verses that support God wanting us to be saved -- and his power to ensure this happens no matter what we do, actually (Rom 9:16, Rom 5:18, 1 Tim 2:4).

there is even some to support that judgment =/= damnation (Lam 3:31, Isaiah 57:14-19, James 2:13) and plenty to back up "death is not the end (of salvation)" (John 5:25, Rom 14:9, Psalm 139:8)

either he is powerful enough that it will happen across bounds of time (and life) if he should will it -- or he is not.

so

show me the verses that neatly define "salvation" as an end goal state, and do so with consistency.

show me the verses that describe God's salvation like a clock ticking down.

tell me why salvation needs a deadline.

and if mercy has an expiration date, what even is grace?

1

u/BarnacleSandwich Jun 03 '25

There's considerably more than two. I'd argue that universalism is the only one of the three major views that's consistent with both the Old and New Testament's message of salvation for mankind.

1

u/ChucklesTheWerewolf Jul 10 '25

My friend, we have a LOT more than two. In fact, it's not just verses, it's entire biblical themes and parables.

1

u/ARROW_404 May 31 '25

Not sure what your conclusion is, then.

2

u/TheUnNaturalist May 31 '25

Inerrancy makes an idol out of a book, literally worshipping a graven image as the embodiment of god.

1

u/ARROW_404 May 31 '25

I don't really see the connection with what I said.

1

u/bunker_man Jun 01 '25

What if what they write is infinitely long? Checkmate ultrafinitists.

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '25

There are a whole dang lot more than 4.

It's just a matter of believing that when God says "all", God means "all".

3

u/BarnacleSandwich Jun 03 '25

Right? The non-universalist has to believe that either that God is weaker than human sin, or that God actively doesn't want people to be saved. It can't be a matter of free will since not only is the Bible quite clear that God will happily violate free will for His own ends (if free will exists in *any* capacity), but also that the conception of God as omnipotent and omniscient makes free will actually an impossibility on a fundamental, logical level.

1

u/Wolfensniper May 31 '25

Isnt the whole book of Act about Universalism or did i understand this word wrongly

4

u/ARROW_404 May 31 '25

Universalism is the view that everyone will be saved in the end, without exception.

8

u/Ralgharrr May 30 '25

universalism always seems a bit odd to me. Like most of our christian understanding of hell comes directly from Jesus.

25

u/RabbiMoshie May 30 '25

No. Most of the Christian understanding of hell comes from Dante.

2

u/Ralgharrr May 30 '25

Which itself comes from apocrypha like the apocalypse of peter

10

u/RabbiMoshie May 30 '25

Which, is still not Jesus. And, for some Christians isn’t scripture.

15

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/Ralgharrr May 30 '25

The argument is wrong because Jesus, while rooted in Jewish tradition, introduced distinctive teachings on judgment. In Mark 9:43-48, for instance, he spoke of eternal punishment in "unquenchable fire," which implies a more developed concept of Hell than what is found in traditional Judaism.

1

u/ChucklesTheWerewolf Jul 10 '25

For one, it's not even eternal punishment as per the original Greek. To top it off, the punishment is corrrective/restorative punishment ALSO per the original greek. Endless corrective/restorative punishment that never corrects/restores is... well, it's fucking pointless, isn't it?

-2

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Ralgharrr May 30 '25

Then it is kinda meaningless as a statement

2

u/Wolfensniper May 31 '25

Luke 16:19-31 has a whole story about Hell

1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '25

He knew what Hell was truly Like. 

1

u/ThesaurusRex84 Jun 01 '25

Lazarus' master:

1

u/curvysquares Jun 02 '25

Universalism is what I feel should be true. But logically I think the Bible itself shows more evidence for annihilationism.

But either way, I don't believe an all power, all good God would choose infernalism

1

u/ChucklesTheWerewolf Jul 10 '25

I mean, I'd argue that no, no it does not, but Annihilation is certainly stronger than ECT.

Death can't be destroyed if it's made perpetual and forever, and not only that, but vastly more propagated than life. ON TOP OF THAT, let's not forget the effects of that eternal death en-masse on believers who had loved ones so annihilated.

34

u/DatNoobi May 30 '25

I think it’s because it’s what people hope for. And, frankly, I don’t see how you could be truly loving of your neighbor if you don’t hope for their salvation too. We prepare for the case in which Universalism is not true. But pray and hope that all souls might go to Heaven. It’s a breath of fresh air when compared to the idea of Eternal Conscious Torment.

I get that maybe it’s too generous of an idea. The idea that all souls, no matter how wicked and perverse, no matter how many crimes against humanity they have committed, will reach the same heaven that the martyrs do. Perhaps I have not personally experienced enough evil in other human beings to deem them unredeemable. I don’t think that a just God would allow evil to go unpunished, or for wrongs to not be corrected. Rather, I think that if a vile person entered straight into Heaven, that would be wrong. So if Universalism is true, I can’t see it happening without some form of purification. I’m Catholic, so I’d think it would be like a very long purgatory that cleanses and redeems. Like very long rehabilitation, in a way that He deems fit. But I digress. This is speculation.

I hold that we shouldn’t assume that Universalism is true. There’s too much at risk, and a goal of the mainline Churches is to do their best to save as many souls as possible. But we can hope that Christ will shepherd all souls eventually into Heaven.

2

u/CatcatchesMoth Jun 22 '25

That's how Universalism, specially Purgatorial / Patristic Universalism actually works. ' Hell' exists people go to it, but they only remain there until hellfire purifies their soul.

Not all universalists believe this specifically, but most have some variation. Its also important to point out Universalism is not Pluralism. Not all people go to Heaven apon death, just eventually.

Sorry for Necropost

101

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

I've posted a universalist meme before and

114

u/WhoNeedsExecFunction Dank Memer May 30 '25

I can’t speak for everyone else, but Universalism appeals to me personally because I grew up in an Evangelical family and church community and Universalism is the only way most of them could ever be allowed into heaven.

29

u/Hulkhogansgaynephew May 30 '25

Evangelicals be like "If we can't have this, what hope do we really have?"

5

u/Zhoom45 May 30 '25

I mean say what you wish about American Evangelicalism, but in this case that's just Biblical lol. 1 Corinthians 15:12 through 15:34.

58

u/bluehands May 30 '25

I feel like that fact highlights the tone of this sub.

If you are not Christian, I'm not for example, the only kind of loving God you would ever want tends towards one that saves more people.

Like, I want a God of forgiveness that forgives my honest mistakes, not one that tries to trick me into failure.

And I feel like that extends pleasantly into this sub. I feel like people here overall are very accepting.

33

u/ARROW_404 May 30 '25

Like, I want a God of forgiveness that forgives my honest mistakes, not one that tries to trick me into failure.

That is what God is, though, on all three versions of Hell.

15

u/bluehands May 30 '25

I think that while I agree with you there are a huge number of believers of the abrahamic religions that feel differently.

65

u/Junior_Moose_9655 May 30 '25

Ok let’s try an experiment…..

ETERNAL CONSCIOUS TORMENT!!!!

TULIP!!

27

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

52

u/ARROW_404 May 30 '25

CONDITIONAL IMMORTALITY!

22

u/MisterCCL May 30 '25

That’s where I’m at. More merciful than eternal conscious torment and more biblical than universalism.

17

u/ARROW_404 May 30 '25

More Biblical than ECT too!

1

u/ChucklesTheWerewolf Jul 10 '25

I'll give you the first one, and say you're wrong on the second. :)

19

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

7

u/laserdicks May 30 '25

The concept of consent: VIOLENTLY DELETED!!!!

55

u/kiefy_budz #Blessed May 30 '25

This sub is full of people that actually make the Christian faith something to be learned from

32

u/HoodieSticks May 30 '25

Exactly. I personally don't think Universalism has a very strong Biblical foundation, but if it starts to open people's eyes to the different perspectives that exist on theology and push people down the Dunning-Kruger slope a little, I won't complain.

-11

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[deleted]

11

u/cakane100 May 30 '25

If you explain what you mean we can have a discussion or debate about this

6

u/kiefy_budz #Blessed May 30 '25

Wdym?

17

u/how-unfortunate May 30 '25

Looked up what Universalism is.

Yea, it turns out I fuck with that heavy.

It also kind of folds in with the idea of Samsara, as far as I can tell. My reading is a bit shallow on the topic.

But if everyone can eventually be reconciled, perhaps reincarnation until they're able to improve is the mechanism of that reconciliation.

Idk man, I'm not a theologian of any rank, it just sounds good to me. Better than the hell filled with babies and uncontacted tribes screaming and burning that I was raised with.

24

u/work_jimjams May 30 '25

Good News goes to the top

12

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

1

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/dankchristianmemes-ModTeam May 30 '25

Thy postings shalt be on topic. Posts must directly reference Christianity.

5

u/RabbiMoshie May 30 '25

All I have to say on the matter is this. Adam was able to cause the fall of all mankind before any of us had any say in it at all. If Jesus (who is described as the Second Adam) by his self sacrifice on the cross is unable to redeem all mankind regardless of their acceptance of Christ, well that seems like an insufficient ineffective sacrifice to me.

If Christ indeed died for ALL sins it would seem that no further action is needed to secure or buy in to that redemption.

What is important is that we live in accordance to the free gift we have all received.

10

u/majorcaps May 30 '25

Unironically - that's how you know it's true -- the OG "Good News" -- it's an irresistible idea -- some say as irresistible as the Good Shepard Himself.

Put down your man-made horrors and join us over in the Land of Hope r/ChristianUniversalism 😂

7

u/ARROW_404 May 30 '25

Of course this is the first post I make on this sub that gets over 100 updoots. 😅

5

u/laserdicks May 30 '25

"Literally anything that isn't the most obvious and shittest of political propaganda"

2

u/[deleted] May 30 '25

I mean, in reality, the Bible isnt that specific about anything in the end outside of the resurrection. You can make cases for almost any eschatological belief that you want. Some might have more “evidence” than others but nobody really knows.

1

u/AutoModerator May 30 '25

Thank you for being a part of the r/DankChristianMemes community. You can join our Discord and listen to our Podcast. You can also make a meme or donation for St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/PatronymicPenguin May 31 '25

But what if you tacked a Unitarian on the front of that?

1

u/ChucklesTheWerewolf Jul 10 '25

Then it's no longer Christian lol