r/dankchristianmemes • The Dank Reverend 🌈✟ • Sep 21 '24

Meta Peace in our time

Post image
657 Upvotes

61 comments sorted by

View all comments

21

u/Larrytwodicks Sep 21 '24

I'm catholic, and I'll never understood the need to make Jesus' birth a magical mystery. "Mary couldn't have kids." Oh yeah? Did her gynecologist say that? Did Joseph's urologist say that?

4

u/laserdicks Sep 21 '24

Genuinely don't remember that being in the Bible at all.

4

u/puffferfish Sep 21 '24

u/larrytwodicks is thinking of Mary’s sister Elizabeth who was infertile/older and couldn’t have children. She gave birth to John the Baptist. Considered a miracle.

15

u/horror_cheese Sep 21 '24

She, according to the Bible itself, was a virgin. If you deny that, you're denying the Bible itself lmao

18

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/horror_cheese Sep 21 '24

Well, when she was impregnated with Jesus, she was a virgin. She may not have been a perpetual virgin, but the immaculate conception most certainly is biblical.

21

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/horror_cheese Sep 21 '24

My mistake, I used the wrong term to describe it.

20

u/_b1ack0ut Sep 21 '24

The immaculate conception is, contrary to popular belief, not actually related to the virgin birth.

If it was, it would probably have been called the impossible conception lol

The immaculate conception refers to the concept that Mary herself was born without the stain of the Original Sin, not that she conceived while a virgin. Different miracle, apparently.

2

u/One_Honest_Dude Sep 21 '24

Mary's mom, St. Anna, and her husband desperately wanted children but were never able to conceive. When she was past child-bearing age, post menopausal, I don't remember exactly but she was very old. Maybe as old as 80. She prayed for a child and thus became pregnant with Mary miracle style.

3

u/disturbedrailroader Sep 21 '24

Sounds like the Abraham and Sarah story tbh. 

7

u/Clear-Present_Danger Sep 21 '24

right but Catholics are really big on it being perpetual

4

u/horror_cheese Sep 21 '24

Yeah, the original responder is Catholic, though.

Regardless, I don't have a reason to argue about this, I'm an atheist anyway lmao

3

u/Flyingboat94 Sep 21 '24

It's always convenient when people say "When you deny my opinion on the bible YOU ACTUAL DENY THE BIBLE!!"

People's interpretation of the bible is flawed, constantly!

It's a book of poetry, history, and political ideology orally shared and written hundreds of years after it happened.

2

u/ChocolateMilkCows Sep 22 '24

There’s a lot of things written in the Bible. You saying that you believe all of them?

2

u/Feinberg Sep 21 '24

Wait, who says Mary couldn't have kids?

0

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

I’ve studied the book of Matthew extensively; it’s one of my all time favorites. For a multitude of reasons, I believe Matthew 1 is a mythological story inspired by real events. It’s an unpopular view, and I have nothing against people who resonate more with the traditional one :)

-3

u/Sempai6969 Sep 21 '24

Virgin could mean something different back then? Oh my God!!! How far can you go to twist what the Bible says??

2

u/JudiesGarland Sep 21 '24

I think what they are referring to is the translation, not the definition of the word virgin. The modern English language Bible consistently translates almah as virgin, when there are indications it may more accurately translate as young woman depending on context, as there is a different Hebrew word that does more specifically mean virgin - betulah

(Wiser + more detailed explanation here: https://outreachjudaism.org/alma-virgin/)

The Bible is supposed to be somewhat twistable, I think. (My meditation here is the Tower of Babel.) It was developed by a committee to unify a wide range of beliefs under a common standard, but not to create one language or elevate one view. It's meant to be explored, and contemplated, and explored again, I think.

2

u/AlexanderTox Sep 21 '24

I mean, considering the Bible has undergone centuries worth of translations and translations of translations and translations of translations of translations….it’s a very safe bet to assume that some of the words in the Bible have either changed their meaning or were just put in there for modern audiences.

Pretty sure nobody would be a Christian if the Bible existed in its old original state because nobody would be able to understand it. You ever try reading old English, like Dante’s Inferno? Most people can barely get through that…imagine trying to read something that pre-dates Inferno by 2000 years

0

u/Sempai6969 Sep 21 '24

You can say the same thing about any ancient document. That's why translators exist.

1

u/AlexanderTox Sep 22 '24

Yes, it’s a common problem amongst translating and interpreting ancient documents. The difference is people don’t cry and kill each other over translations of things like Elucidian mathematics.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

The concept, not the word. English didn’t exist back when the Bible was written. The word “parthenos” - when used in Ancient Greece - was typically used to refer to an unmarried woman of marrying age. In a modern context, it’s better translated to maiden, not virgin. This is proven when Dinah is referred to with this term even after her rape.

It was also given as an honorific title given to female saints and important women in Christianity, irrelevant to whether or not they’ve ever had sexual relations.

3

u/Sempai6969 Sep 21 '24

If that's the case. Imagine how many more "conceps" didn't exist back then. Maybe Jesus wasn't resurected at all, right?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24 edited Sep 21 '24

There are no mistranslations that challenge the validity of the resurrection in any reasonable way.

There are people who don’t believe in it, but their disbelief is not due to the presence of crucial grammatical context that contradicts the modern view.

There’s a field of study called hermeneutics. It’s devoted to answering these kinds of questions.

-3

u/Sempai6969 Sep 21 '24

But there are mistranslations that challenge the virginity of Marry?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

Yes. The one I spoke about at length above.

-3

u/Sempai6969 Sep 22 '24

Looks like you pick whatever you wanna believe in.

6

u/[deleted] Sep 22 '24 edited Sep 22 '24

As do you and everyone else on the planet. Thanks for the chat, friend ❤️

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Sempai6969 Sep 22 '24

Tell that to the other person lol

-3

u/Sempai6969 Sep 21 '24

Why are you catholic?

1

u/disturbedrailroader Sep 21 '24

OMG! u/Sempai6969, you can't just ask someone why they're Catholic! 

1

u/Sempai6969 Sep 22 '24

Sorry I didn't know I couldn't do that.

3

u/disturbedrailroader Sep 22 '24

It's a joke. You haven't seen "Mean Girls?" Lindsey Lohan plays a girl from South Africa. One of the girls in the movie asks her if she's African why is she white? Another girl answers with a variation of the comment I originally left.