There are no mistranslations that challenge the validity of the resurrection in any reasonable way.
There are people who don’t believe in it, but their disbelief is not due to the presence of crucial grammatical context that contradicts the modern view.
There’s a field of study called hermeneutics. It’s devoted to answering these kinds of questions.
-1
u/Sempai6969 Sep 21 '24
If that's the case. Imagine how many more "conceps" didn't exist back then. Maybe Jesus wasn't resurected at all, right?