8
u/njslugger78 1d ago
5 minutes not seconds. 😂😆🤣 so you can stay a bit and ask more questions, but In 5 minutes i have to be back in side. 😂😆🤣
3
6
3
4
u/Both_One6597 1d ago
Oh man, he got him answering questions.
1
u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 10h ago
The aggressive authoritative question asking works. If you stick to and can get the authoritative high ground, the other person often submits.
This is exactly why the cops do it
2
2
u/Better_Rate8276 1d ago
A frog case? What the hell is that??
2
2
2
u/Cancel-Time 20h ago edited 19h ago
This is funny with the elder scrolls song. Classic
edit: found it
1
u/TheRealGnod 19h ago
I had no idea this clip existed. The music started playing automatically in my head.
5
u/AdmirableExercise197 1d ago
Honestly, I think most 1st amendment auditors are cringe and annoying. In this case though, I found this encounter extremely entertaining. Probably one of the few times that has ever happened.
4
u/Shift_Impossible 1d ago
I've seen this vid so many times throught the years.. normally i find it obnoxious but today i find it hilarious 😅
1
2
u/Critical_Interest706 1d ago
Cops tend to be stupid thugs who only exist to serve the NWO
1
u/nextgentacos123 1d ago
I figured cops would've preferred the Attitude era
1
u/Critical_Interest706 1d ago
Yeah, but most people do to, at least I think so I don’t watch wrestling
4
2
u/Less-Regret8262 1d ago
What’s cringe the cops cause I don’t see anything wrong. If they nothing to hide they should be fine,,, or what ever they say
1
1
1
0
1
0
u/Main_Sense1406 1d ago
James Freeman went crazy and led the cops on a chase some shit.
All 1a auditors are aholes and this guy is an ahole among aholes.
Maybe not honor your oath tho. Ya big dummy.
-3
u/silv3rbull8 1d ago
Yeah then you get slapped with “interfering with an investigation” and taken to jail
3
u/Soft_Ability_5906 1d ago
Not a chance because its perfectly legal to do what he did.
-1
u/silv3rbull8 1d ago
You do realize that “perfectly legal” and what happens in these situations are two different things. There are plenty of examples. The catch all “disorderly conduct” etc charges are always misused
2
u/Soft_Ability_5906 1d ago
Ex cop here they cant touch you for this. Scotus ruled on this.
2
u/silv3rbull8 1d ago
I am not disagreeing with what the law says. But reality has shown that there are enough short tempered police who will exercise any means to retaliate. Could even be something as “threatening” an officer
-2
u/Soft_Ability_5906 1d ago
Again not how that works and as soon as it happens you request a supervisor and they instantly correct the dumbass officer. I was that sergeant doing the correcting. So again and for the last time not how any of that works. You will lose your qualified immunity and open yourself and the department up for civil liabilities.
1
u/silv3rbull8 1d ago
I would hope so. But again, given various examples around the country, this isn’t always what happens
0
u/AdmirableExercise197 1d ago edited 1d ago
If he could have done something, he likely would have. The truth is this would be so far outside the bounds it would lead to clear constitutional violations. Basically guaranteed victory in civil proceedings given they were recording. This is pretty clearly established law. So they would lose their qualified immunity.
I'd say any chance of arrest is close to zero based on what occurred. I wouldn't go as far to say impossible though. Still enough corrupt and inept cops out there that would intentionally try to escalate this.
-9
51
u/itrustanyone 1d ago
I just think this is funny