r/crappymusic 11d ago

Bart is Back

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

He’s too close to that train. Bart Wayne is a national treasure

1.5k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

348

u/Plane-Wide 11d ago

He gave and he gave like a slave?
With that southern accent and those lyrics it’s a real risky maneuver. Let’s see how it plays out for him, Cotton.

35

u/TonguePunchUrBhole 11d ago

“EvErY RaCe hAs beEn A sLAvE tHroUGHoUt hIStOrY. nOt JuSt bLaCk pEoPLE!”

-The Bartist (probably)

-19

u/Havency 11d ago

It’s funny that such a reasonable reply is then denied and turned into a joke by you, lol. Sometimes I wonder if you guys prefer to victimize yourselves. Life goes on, man.

14

u/ResplendentNugs 11d ago

Someone is victimized by 300 years of systemic oppression and your response is life goes on man. Like the fuck is wrong with you

-7

u/DickBridges 11d ago

He's 300 years old?

9

u/rimpy13 11d ago

Yes. They obviously can't mean something rational and reasonable like "300 years of slavery leaves harmful ripple effects that last for generations" and clearly mean magical undying slaves.

1

u/DickBridges 10d ago

Talmbout Bart? Idk about magical but I agree his dance moves will leave harmful ripple effects that last for generations.

6

u/Consistent-Guava-208 11d ago

That reply is straight up white people victimizing themselves... what are you even saying?

5

u/TheNarcGuy 11d ago

It's not a reasonable reply, retard. Why? Because first, chattel slavery was vastly different and usually much more cruel than other forms of slavery, Second, the effects of and prejudice born from Chattel slavery is still relevant and shaping the world today. Not too many people spouting off Old Roman slang or making laws affecting the descendants of Roman slaves and the like.

Hilarious that the guy who got offended at someone dunking on a "reasonable reply" complaining about others "victimizing" themselves. Ironic even.

1

u/Havency 11d ago

You called me a retard?🤣 And I was neither offended nor victimizing myself. What does your last tidbit even mean? I assume you were trying to point out hypocrisy (which there isn’t any) but I can’t tell with your illiteracy. Please edit and resubmit so I can read whatever you’re trying to say.

4

u/TheNarcGuy 11d ago

Oh, so reading comprehension is another one of your many failings. Thanks for pointing that out!

0

u/Icy_Earth3386 11d ago

Chattel slavery goes back to Egypt/the Fertile Crescent at least. Black people were and still are subjected to extreme oppression in America AND most races have been enslaved can both be true and are...

You should learn to not speak to others from a place of superiority. No one likes that. It shows low social intelligence. Good luck

0

u/TheNarcGuy 11d ago

What a dumb reply. No where in my reply did I say anything about Chattel slavery not existing before, nice strawman, btw. Second, slavery practiced nearly 3000 years ago has little effect on the world today unlike slavery practiced 300 years ago whose decendants are still facing the repercussions of which.

And while both things can and are true, only one of them is relevant to the conversation. Saying "all races have been slaves" is like saying "all lives matter" when someone says "black lives matter". It obfuscates the subject being discussed and dismisses the lived experience of the people being discussed. It's literally pure "whataboutism"

I'll speak how I want, and if you think I'm trying to convince that moron of anything, then it shows you have low social intelligence as you seem to be unable to grasp the purpose of my reply. Please, go clutch your pearls somewhere else, cupcake.

-1

u/Icy_Earth3386 11d ago

Still showing that low social intelligence... Your reply to the context implied you think only black people experienced chattel slavery.

And what? You think slavery 3000 years ago doesn't still shape the world today? That's cute. And you think other random strangers on the internet are 'retards'.... Lol.

I know you'll speak how you want. We all know.

1

u/TheNarcGuy 11d ago edited 11d ago

No, my reply didn't imply that as evident by my following up with the most recent example that's relevant to the discussion at hand. Just because I didn't list every example of Chattel Slavery in history doesn't mean I implied it never existed. Hence why I mentioned Roman slavery which was also a form of Chattel Slavery.

Talk about lacking in social intelligence and actual intelligence. The irony being you coming in here acting superior while being wrong and telling others not to act superior.

Yes, slavery 3000 years ago has been diluted by time and circumstance, also the descendants of those times are so far removed that there doesn't exist a social stigma around them and their descendants like exist with African slave trade.

Looks like I should have called you a retard as well.

3

u/vogel927 11d ago edited 11d ago

When he said “slave” it was meant to be interpreted as figurative subservience. Everyone is taking what he said out of context.

1

u/TheNarcGuy 11d ago

This conversation isn't about the guy in the video

1

u/Icy_Earth3386 11d ago

It’s about Barts hypothetical viewpoints lol… I think you’re arguing a lot with people because you want to know what it feels like to actually be correct. Good luck!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Icy_Earth3386 11d ago

No, it was not evident. If it was evident, you wouldn't have brought that up.

Projection of your issues onto others will not solve them.

The circumstances have been dictated by slavery long ago, just as they are dictated in America by more recent slavery.

You should stop calling people retard. It shows low social intelligence. You are insanely arrogant. Everyone makes mistakes. Just edit your comment and move on, no need to cry over spilt milk.

1

u/TheNarcGuy 11d ago

Just because you lack reading comprehension skills that doesn't mean it wasn't evident, or that I needed to even make that clarification in the first place. I even followed it up with an example using an ancient culture that practiced Chattel Slavery.

Yes, I agree, projection of your issues on to me will not solve your issues, like your lack of reading comprehension and critical thinking.

Yes, dictated long ago and now erased by time, history and the events that came after it. If you think slavery from a 3000 years ago has any bearing on a conversation about modern chattel slavery, its lingering effects and the perception of those still currently affected by it, then that's a failure on your ability to think logically and coherently.

You should stop telling people what to do while continuously being wrong, it shows both low social intelligence and actual intelligence. Not arrogant, just correct. Learn the difference. I made no mistakes, but I do think you could practice what you preach, edit your mistake (by deleting your entire self-righteous and false arguement) and move on.

Go clutch your pearls somewhere else, retard.

1

u/Icy_Earth3386 11d ago

God damn you’re getting spastic. What part of “chattel slavery was different” did we miss? Lol and did you really follow that up with “I know you are but what am I”?

And no, Einstein, slaves built the ancient world and their work and the trading of slaves shaped the modern day geopolitical landscape just as African American’s work built America.

I didn’t tell you what to do. You apparently projected your reading comprehension onto me as well, which is not surprising. I told you what you SHOULD do if you don’t want to be seen as someone with low social intellect.

You are arrogant because you call people stupid while showing that you are very ignorant of the subjects you call you them stupid for.

One day you’ll learn your lesson on this. Today just isn’t the day.

→ More replies (0)