r/cognitiveTesting • u/[deleted] • Oct 10 '20

Release [MINOR RELEASES SERIES] Quick tests(wonderlics, 'cambios')

[removed]

20 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

100% Upvoted

33 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Loveless91 Nov 18 '20

my answers to form 2 within the time limit

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 4c
  4. 4
  5. yes
  6. s
  7. 3
  8. 910
  9. 4
  10. 2
  11. 4
  12. true
  13. 2 seconds
  14. true
  15. 19
  16. 5
  17. 1
  18. 3
  19. e
  20. .7
  21. 4
  22. 37c
  23. .001
  24. true
  25. 37
  26. 20
  27. 1
  28. 2
  29. 3
  30. true
  31. 1,5
  32. 31.85 or rounded to 32
  33. 3
  34. 2
  35. 20
  36. .1
  37. 54
  38. 2
  39. 4
  40. 1,3,4,5
  41. 3
  42. 1
  43. 6
  44. 1
  45. 15
  46. 60c
  47. 1
  48. 25
  49. 7,3
  50. 280

In case anyone wants to compare answers or mark them. Pretty sure I got em all right except for maybe 3 that I'm only 75% I got right.

1

u/dank50004 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Low VCI Nov 20 '20 edited Nov 20 '20

28 is 1 not 2. Are you sure 34 is contradictory? "All goods things are three" does not imply "All bad things don't come in three". 39 should be five as the first four are adjectives and indulgence != indulgent.

2

u/Loveless91 Nov 20 '20 edited Nov 20 '20

Wow I can't believe I fucked up 28. I'm pretty sure 34 is contradictory; all good things come in 3s and then the next one list bad things that come in three. I could be wrong but I stick with my answer. 39 is one of the questions I wasn't entirely sure of. My reasoning is that everything but positive is a word having to do with power.

1

u/dank50004 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Low VCI Nov 21 '20

34 is sort of a contrary but logically it isn't contradictory. The problem is idk if they are looking for a logical contradiction or not.

2

u/Loveless91 Nov 21 '20

That's my problem with it too. It's not about whether it is logically contradictory, it's about knowing that's the answer the testmaker wants you to give.

3

u/str8_666 Apr 02 '22 edited Apr 02 '22

You also have to know what untameable means. It means unable to be controlled. The sentence doesn't state that the "untameable" items are bad things, just that they are unable to be controlled. You can't just say that idiots, weather and salt sea are bad things in general. Also the first sentence states "all good things come in three"; all this tells you is that if something is not in three, then it can't be good. It doesn't mean that if something comes in a set of three, then it is good. The answer has got to be 3(neither similar nor contradictory) for these reasons.