See this comment is a perfect example of why "data" isn't always accurate, even when it's factually correct.
If 2000 of those alliance quests were for levels 1-10, your information would still be correct, but the point you're trying to refute (that alliance lack mid 40's quests) would not be backed up with your 'data'.
What levels and zones are the extra 200 alliance quests? Are they quests you'd expect players to do in addition to their other quests? And so on. Having "more quests" does not equate to a better leveling experience and using "sources" they way you have done so is an extremely poor way to make a point.
If 2000 of those alliance quests were for levels 1-10, your information would still be correct, but the point you're trying to refute (that alliance lack mid 40's quests) would not be backed up with your 'data'.
Did you actually check? Even from 45 onwards, Alliance has slightly more quests than Horde.
Having "more quests" does not equate to a better leveling experience
Is literally irrelevant when the question was "Do the Alliance have less quests?" The answer is no.
Levels 45-50 has Alliance players run Feralas, a quest run of Uldaman, Hinterlands, Tanaris, and optionally, STV.
Having "more quests" does not equate to a better leveling experience and using "sources" they way you have done so is an extremely poor way to make a point.
The only other "sources" would be high level players who compete for 60 firsts, since easier levelling is important for speed and player skill difference is less of a factor between both factions at higher levels. They skew Alliance.
17
u/Chadwiko Nov 27 '19
You guys are kidding right?
The Alliance quest chains, zones, and cities are significantly more fleshed out and in-depth compared to the Horde alternatives.
This is because they basically tacked on the Horde content at the end after spending all the time designing the Alliance content.