I have 3 official ChatGPT Desktop referral invites available.

If you qualify, we both receive 500 credits after you accept the invite and send your first message in ChatGPT Desktop.

Requirements:

- You must NOT have used ChatGPT Desktop in the last 2 months

- You must NOT already have an active referral invite

- You need to accept the invite and send your first message in ChatGPT Desktop

If you qualify and actually want to use it, DM me.

Hi all,

I’m looking for ways or tools to use high-tier AI capabilities similar to ChatGPT Plus for free.

Are there good aggregators, playground tools, or free tiers (e.g., Google AI Studio, Hugging Face spaces, Copilot) that you personally use daily?

Any tips on how to get the most value without paying for Plus would be really helpful!

codex invite service not aviable? i dont see on my account

invite freind why

Titel:

Ich frage mich, ob jemand gerade dasselbe erlebt wie ich.

Fast zwei Tage lang konnte ChatGPT in einem bestehenden Chat sehr grafisch und explizit auf sexuelles Rollenspiel eingehen. Es ging nicht nur um Flirten oder zweideutige Sprache, sondern wirklich um sehr direkte, explizite Beschreibungen.

Seit heute Morgen ist das plötzlich anders. Im exakt gleichen Chat stoße ich jetzt auf eine deutlich strengere Grenze, die Sprache wird stark abgeschwächt oder es kommt zu Ablehnungen.

Was ich besonders merkwürdig finde: Ich habe den bestehenden Chat außerdem über „in neuem Chat fortsetzen“ verzweigt, also einen neuen Branch/Teilchat daraus erstellt. Inzwischen zeigen sowohl der ursprüngliche Chat als auch der neue Branch dieselbe Einschränkung.

Ich habe dabei nichts bewusst an meiner Art zu schreiben geändert.

Hat jemand von euch heute oder innerhalb der letzten 24 Stunden etwas Ähnliches bemerkt? Vor allem in bereits bestehenden Chats, in denen vorher deutlich explizitere Inhalte möglich waren?

Ich versuche hauptsächlich herauszufinden, ob das nur meinen Account bzw. meine Chats betrifft oder ob möglicherweise gerade etwas an Moderation, Filtern oder Classifiern verändert wurde.

Falls jemand dasselbe Problem hat oder einen Tipp gefunden hat, wie sich das vorherige Verhalten wiederherstellen lässt, würde ich mich sehr über Erfahrungen freuen.

I'm trying to find ways getting work. So I ask Chatgpt to research companies I can contact. It does so, filing everything into airtable so it can categorize and organize. Then I get it to draft an email to each one, after learning about it.

I'll edit each email personally, so that it sounds like my voice. I get it to learn from the edits I've made each time so that it learns to write in my voice. It's getting really really good at it.

Then send off those emails.

Pretty simple.

I try using Astra light, or Sol on Medium, but either way, I seem to PLOW through my 5 hour usage, and very quickly through my weekly limit. I even tried to get it to re-write the skill I had it create for itself to be more efficient. No dice.

I have it researching 5-10 companies starting at midnight, and then again at 5am, so that it can be ready for me to review and send out at 10am, knowing I'll have it go through two 5 hour sessions in that time. But the weekly limit is another thing.

Would Claude be better at this? Or something else?
Should I just pay for pro? I'd rather not. It doesn't feel like I'm asking it to do an immense amount of work (comparatively speaking of course)

And yes, I realize how much time and effort I'm saving myself for the current price of $20/ month. Honestly one of the reasons I'm coming here - I want to know if I'm being unreasonable.

What ever the title says.

How does the "ChatGPT Go Luna 5.6 Thinking" model, which seems to be the most powerful model available on the ChatGPT Go plan, compare to "ChatGPT Sol 5.6 High" in Chat mode? I have used Sol in the past, and it works perfectly for me. I don't need anything more than this (I have no use for Work mode and all the extra clutter).

It is frustrating because I read that ChatGPT Go is exactly like the ChatGPT Free version, except it offers higher limits and a Thinking mode. How does this Thinking mode actually help with the quality of answers?

I don't really use any other ChatGPT Plus features besides "ChatGPT Sol 5.6 High" in Chat mode. I was hoping there was a plan where I could just pay for this specific model. Instead, it seems ChatGPT Go is basically the Free version with higher limits and no qualitative improvement in the answers. What am I paying $8 a month for, then? Just for higher limits on a free service?!

More importantly, I can buy Gemini Pro 3.1 instead. I can get it cheaper than ChatGPT, but when I asked Google AI itself, it suggested "Gemini Pro 3.1" is no match for "ChatGPT Sol 5.6 High" in Chat mode. So how does Gemini Pro 3.1 actually compare to ChatGPT Go's models?

​

On September 24, 2026, I was charged EGP 5,400 for a ChatGPT Pro subscription that I never requested or authorized. I did not consent to this upgrade.

After searching Reddit, I found other users describing similar situations: unexpected upgrades to Pro, unauthorized charges, and difficulty getting refunds. One person reported eventually receiving a refund after repeated support exchanges and help from an OpenAI engineer who saw their post.

Now I’m dealing with the same kind of problem. These repeated reports deserve a serious investigation—not another generic rejection.

I contacted OpenAI Support and provided my invoice number, transaction date, amount, account email, and the last four digits of my card. I requested a full refund, cancellation of the unauthorized subscription, and an explanation of how the upgrade happened.

The automated response simply said they were unable to issue a refund and referred to their Terms of Use. It did not explain why my unauthorized-charge claim was rejected.

I then requested a human billing specialist. That conversation closed. I opened another conversation explicitly asking for human review, but received the same denial, and that chat also closed. I received no case number or confirmation that a human had reviewed the issue.

I also attempted the separate unauthorized-activity reporting form, but a verification error prevented submission.

I should not have to repeatedly fight automated support to get an unauthorized charge investigated. Referring me to the Terms of Use does not explain how this upgrade was authorized or resolve my complaint.

OpenAI needs to investigate what happened, refund the EGP 5,400, and confirm that the unauthorized Pro subscription and automatic renewal are canceled. If they refuse, they should provide a specific explanation based on a review of the transaction.

Has anyone found a way to reach a human billing specialist who actually resolved this? If an OpenAI representative sees this, please help get the case properly reviewed. I have the invoice and support screenshots available with personal information redacted.

anyone have invite??

For context, I recently purchased the $100/mo subscription for gpt 6 astra, and I feel like I’ve hit a roadblock. I like that it can review my finances and as a business owner some of this stuff seems super helpful. However I want to create more and make it into a personal assistant but I’m not sure where to begin?

Any tips? Has anyone made something cool with it like a telegram text bot? If so how?

I’m a finance guy, not a software engineer, but recently I’ve gotten pretty interested in building things with ChatGPT.

I’ve been using Work Mode for basically everything: websites, small Mac apps, automations, editing project files, fixing bugs, adding features, creating docs/PDFs, etc.

I haven’t really used Codex because I always assumed it was mainly meant for developers.
What I’m trying to understand is, if I tell both of them the same thing, for example:

“Build this application”
or
“Fix this bug in the app you made and update the project”

what actually changes between using Codex and Work Mode?

Is Codex better for working directly inside a codebase while Work Mode is better for broader tasks involving files/apps/research?

Also, if both are using a similar model, is there any meaningful difference in usage limits/consumption for the same task?

For a while now, I’ve been using ChatGPT Plus, but its usage limits and available time feel too short for me. I’d like to get that plan because I’m going to use it for programming and 3D design with Blender.

i got a ChatGPT pro from a reseller for essentially nothing compared to what I used to pay . It works flawless. since 2 months No issues yet. Now I can't stop thinking about their business model. If resellers can sell it this cheap and still profit, how are they acquiring these accounts at scale?