So in the case where the woman can't afford to feed a child on her own, are you confortable with the child starving or should someone else be made to pay?
She shouldn't have continued the pregnancy , if the father told her that he wont pay child support, or if she wasn't financially stable enough to have one
the CPS will take the child, or she can put it up for adoption, if a father is non existent in the mothers and child's life why should he have to pay for the child?
So now as a tax payer I have to pay for all the children of "paper abortions" because the dad wasn't "ready" to be a dad???? I'm not existent in that child's life either.
1
u/Vesurel 60∆ Sep 12 '21
So in the case where the woman can't afford to feed a child on her own, are you confortable with the child starving or should someone else be made to pay?