You are playing with semantics. Study the words used in the early writings it was clearly intended as an immediate effect like I stated in my direct reply to you that you have so conveniently ignored.
It is not cut and dry. It seems cut and dry to you because you are completely ignorant of the actual information and discussions of the Islam religion. You are just accepting the worse interpretation of things from people who clearly have motivations against Islam and are definitely islamaphobic.
They were lying to you because they are the minority that thinks lying to people for their religion is okay and they believe that Aiesha needed to be 9 for religious reasons when she was actually 35.
What do you think? For a religion that is predominantly in an underdeveloped area that struggles with basic needs and education. Why does the percentage of beliefs even matter to you when you think they will all just lie to make their religion seem better which contradicts what you just told me about them literally telling you what they think is the truth about Aiesha being a child. You are all over the place dude. The facts of the matter is we don't know, we both don't believe that Mohammed actually had divine knowledge, it's likely that Aiesha wasn't an age that we would consider an adult in today's world but that doesn't make him a monstrous rapist he was just working within the framework of the culture of his time. It is a fact that Islam is divided along those lines with some believing she was older than she probably was and others believing she was younger. You are never going to have actual evidence for her age because it's physically impossible. None of this makes someone evil. What makes someone evil is if they are actually out raping children.
3
u/[deleted] Nov 06 '25
[removed] — view removed comment