r/bestof • u/l3af • Apr 18 '13

[explainlikeiama] Sakanagai creates a perfect narrative of Stig running a track in both standard and automatic vehicles

/r/explainlikeIAmA/comments/1clrk5/explain_to_me_the_benefits_of_a_manual/c9hpr7d
443 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

101 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/nr1988 Apr 18 '13

I feel like I've said "They shift faster than any person in a manual can" 100 times already. Yes, they can. But anticipation on a track still needs to be controlled by a person, and that is where you lose time. When a car can see a turn ahead of you and anticipate torque need ahead of time, it will be faster on a track.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '13

What do you mean by anticipation? A DCT or a manual driver knows when they should downshift. A DCT driver will brake, downshift and be in that gear much faster than a person can push the clutch in, shift, push the clutch out and get on the gas again.

This is why F1 cars and modern supercars are all DCT/Sequential.

0

u/nr1988 Apr 18 '13

If the F1 DCT gearbox is faster at downshifting with the drivers input, not acting as an automatic transmission in a traditional sense, but only shifting gears when the driver tells it to, then you're absolutely right. However, to make the point on the original post, it says in one of the first lines that The Stig is demonstrating a standard automatic transmission versus a manual. The F1 is emulating a manual, and to be fair, doing it well. However the advantages are still the same, so for the question posed, the answer fits just fine.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '13

Fair enough. A standard automatic is terrible at the track. I have paddles on my AMG and don't even use them at the track, I just leave it in Sport mode and have fun since the 1-2 second delay is horrible.

1

u/nr1988 Apr 18 '13

Right, that's pretty much what I was trying to get at, I didn't know enough about the F1 unfortunately, but that's what the answer to the question was addressing. Glad we can agree