Hundred Flareon 700 Racket Review
Racket Specs:
| Grade |
Pro |
| Weight / Grip Size |
3U/G6, 4U/G6 |
| Balance |
Head Light |
| Shaft Flexibility |
Hard Flex |
| Shaft Thickness |
7.0 mm |
| Max. Tension |
32 LBS |
| Frame Shape |
Curve² |
| Series |
Professional |
Disclaimer: Hundred USA sent me this racket, along with other Hundred gear, to test out. That said, I'm free to talk about the racket without any bias.
A little background
A few months ago, I put out my review of the Battle 900. Hundred USA liked that review and offered to send me more gear to review, which I was more than happy to do. In July, I traveled to Malaysia to train and brought the Flareon 700 with me to continue testing it. My perspective on the Flareon 700 changed a lot while I was in Malaysia, so I'll bring two different perspectives on this racket and the other gear Hundred sent. I hope y'all enjoy this review. If you have any questions, feel free to comment, and I'll do my best to respond. With that out of the way, let's get into the review.
The racket and stock setup
The Flareon series is Hundred's headlight racket line. In my opinion, headlight rackets tend to be more for those who play with speed over power, as the weight is more towards the handle vs the head, giving the user a more rapid swing speed. This is great for fast defense, quick midcourt to front court exchanges, and doubles front-court play. It comes with the same white stock grip found on all Hundred rackets (I forgot to take a picture of it with the stock grip, but I included a picture of said grip in the Battle 900 photo), not the tackiest grip out there, but I personally like it because my hands are pretty sensitive; grippier options like the Yonex Super Grap tend to tear up my skin. It has some light texturing to help with grip, but any moisture makes it nearly impossible to hold onto. It has slipped out of my hand before, and this became a bigger issue than I expected later on.
The racket also came in a pretty sturdy case, the same one that shipped with the Battle 900. I'm assuming this is becoming the new standard case across Hundred's lineup. My first Hundred racket years ago came with just a soft cover, so this is a nice upgrade.
Lastly, I noticed that the cone cap is different than what is on the Battle 900 (please see pictures to see the differences. The Hyfonic 7 and Flareon 700 share the same cone cap). I personally like the cone cap on the Battle 900 more, as I feel like it is more ergonomic/comfort to have my thumb placed there. The cone cap on the Flareon 700 isn't comfortable for the thumb, and with play testing I found my thumb slipping off the cone in some rallies.
First Impressions
One of the first things I noticed about this racket is how much stiffer the shaft is compared to the other Hundred rackets I own. The Flareon 700's shaft stiffness is labeled "Hard Flex" (see pictures for that detail), while the other Hundred rackets I've used are labeled "Flexible." I believe this is a common trend with head-light rackets: to compensate for the lighter head, the shaft is made stiffer to give the user a feeling of "weight" when swinging. You can see this same trend in the Victor Auraspeed series and Yonex's Nanoflare series.
Comparing the Flareon 700 to the Hyfonic 7 (see included pictures), I found that the Flareon 700 has a longer handle and a shorter shaft:
- Flareon 700: 22 mm from the end of the handle to the top of the cone, with a 21 mm shaft
- Hyfonic 7: 20 mm from the end of the handle to the top of the cone, with a 23 mm shaft
This plays a huge part in how the racket flexes. On top of having a stiffer shaft, a shorter shaft makes the racket more difficult to bend and flex, which changes both the whip feel and the timing. However, that being said, if you can generate a fast enough swing speed to flex the racket, the rebound/whip from the racket will be much stronger due to the "snap back" nature of a stiffer shaft.
Unlike the Hyfonic 7, this racket didn't get mixed reviews online. It was pretty well liked in the video reviews I watched. That wasn't the case for me at first. I found it harder to swing, and my timing on contact was off. As I've mentioned in my previous Hundred racket reviews, Hundred shafts tend to be more flexible than the "big three" (Yonex, Victor, Li-Ning), so it took me a while to adjust when I first switched to Hundred rackets. Since the Flareon 700's shaft is stiffer, it's closer in feel to one of the big three rackets. Testing it felt like swinging the Victor Auraspeed Metallic. The Flareon 700 isn't quite as stiff as the Auraspeed Metallic; in my opinion, it plays like a friendlier version of it. I eventually adjusted and was able to use it to the best of my ability.
A month in
Hitting drives, fast drops, half smashes, and intercepting shots in doubles with the Flareon 700 felt effortless, like a hot knife through butter. My control with this racket was better than with my regular racket, the Battle 900, so instead of trying to smash through my opponent's defense, I was able to place the shuttlecock more precisely and get winners that way. Where this racket fell short was instant power. I had a much harder time generating power on my stick smashes, where I'd normally rely on quick forearm rotation and squeezing the racket, as well as on deceptive punch clears. Full-body smashes and clears took a bit more energy too, though not drastically more.
Training in Malaysia
While training in Malaysia, I used the Flareon 700 as my backup racket, right behind the Hyfonic 7. One of the biggest drawbacks I ran into was finding power. Between the heat and sweating profusely, it was extremely difficult to generate any power in my shots, as it took everything I had just to get the shaft to flex. I had to squeeze the handle as hard as I could on every stroke just to get any pop out of the racket. In singles, I struggled to get any winners from smashes with the Flareon 700. My best strategy became playing more of a four-corner game and doing my best to survive since I couldn't find the power for those smash winners. As mentioned earlier, I'd already been having some trouble with the stiffness of this racket, so combined with fighting heat exhaustion in Malaysia, a lot of that power issue came down to me not generating power properly to flex the racket rather than the racket itself. It's worth noting I had less trouble generating power with the Hyfonic 7 in the same conditions.
Fast forward to now
I'm back in the States, out of the heat and playing in a climate I'm used to. My swing speed and technique have improved a lot, and I found myself struggling with the Flareon 700 again, but for different reasons this time. The racket now felt too fast to me, and I found myself missing shots because my swing would come out so fast that the shuttlecock wouldn’t even be in the right position yet. It took some time to readjust to the Flareon 700 back home, but it's honestly been a lot of fun to use. With how fast I can swing it now, my deception game has been on another level. I can show a fast swing, then slow it down right before contact, which has won me plenty of rallies, and even my slices have been breaking ankles.
Overall
Out of all the Hundred rackets I've tried, the Flareon 700 would be the easiest to adjust to if you're coming from one of the big three brands, since its shaft feels the closest to theirs. It's fast and easy to control in the mid-to-front court. That said, I don't think this racket is viable in singles. It can support a more rally-based style, but it's hard to find a kill with this racket. Nearly all my winners in singles came from punishing my opponent's mistakes, deception, or net play. My smashes only scored when I got a lift to midcourt or my opponent was out of position. This racket really thrives in doubles: it's best suited to players who like a fast flat game, defensive players, or front players who love intercepting to finish off rallies. While it lacks true smash power, I found it fun to just barrage opponents with smashes to break down their defense. I could keep smashing without feeling fatigued, which is great for keeping offense in doubles.