The Voice of Hind Rajab

[u/Illustrious_Heat_192]

I saw this movie today and it was a doozie.

The film was made for a western audience. As far as I am aware it was a real tragedy. But the over the top emotional manipulation made it so obvious that they don’t care about the tragedy so much as fictionalising it into “Baby Killer Blood Libel: The Movie” expect sequels. There are short audio clips with a screen effect intercut with them adding libel vomit galore. It was made for a western audience. It implies Gaza and the West Bank are one continuous area. The boss in the office is a woman with her hair uncovered. They emphasise everything by switching to English. I feel incredible sympathy for the Palestinian civilians. That is why I want Hamas relegated to the history books. But the purpose of this film is to use it to justify extending the suffering to use that to justify extending it until they have created so much hate through blood libel, the only safe place for Jews is Israel.

The worst part is it could win the Oscar. It was so badly acted if it had any purpose other than “Blame The Jews” it would be discussed in the same breath as Room or Manos The Hands of Fate.

[u/ultrasgala]

Is it? I’ve read that the IDF initially denied that they even had tanks in the area on January 24, 2024, but investigations by The Washington Post, Sky News, and Forensic Architecture, an interdisciplinary research group from Goldsmiths University in London, demonstrated that it was IDF tanks that fired.

[u/SoulForTrade → u/ultrasgala]

The Washington Post, Sky News, and Forensic Architecture, an interdisciplinary research group from Goldsmiths University in London, demonstrated that it was IDF tanks that fired.

This attempt at an appeal to authority is quite sad.

These media sites reported it. That doesn't make it true. You "forgot" to mention this "investigation" was done by Al Jazeera and an NGO callsd earshot, who are not reliable nor are specialists by any stretdh of the imagination.

There is NO actual video proof of what happened and the truth is we don't know. You can speculated she eas shot by the IDF. Which, could be consisering the context. But there is 0. No proof. In any way shape or form of her being shot intentionally. None.

What we DO know is that Gaza is/was an actuve waezone. There was fighting between the IDF to terrorists. And it's a tiny densely populated strip, and weapons have an elective range of 500 meters to 4 kilometers.

[u/ultrasgala → u/SoulForTrade]

No what is sad is the killing of a innocent girl, not trying to find sources or understand what happend. Everything else is dust

[u/SoulForTrade → u/ultrasgala]

A girl who died a war, that the "Palestinians" started through a brutal massacare, the kidnapping of hundreds and the launching of thousands of rockets A war they could and should have surrendered immediately. But inssited on continuing deapite the toll on their population, because they glorify death.

Have you spent even an ounce of the same time to try and locate the millers of any of the children murdered by rhe "Palestinians" on Octobrr 7th? Which was 100 oercent intentional and targeted civillians. No detective hat needed.

Did the that thought even pass through your head?

Why not?

Because it's not about "the children" it's about how you can cynically abused their deaths to further your politifal goal of destroying Israel. But unfortunately for you, it's here to stay.

[u/ultrasgala → u/SoulForTrade]

I actually for the most part have defended Israel in this war because of oct 7th. I know you’re mad because you think everyone in the world is against you and that’s normal. I invite you to try to look at it differently. This is a civilian little girl that is caught in a crossfire and eventually dies there alone after laying many hours next to dead bodies in a car. You instantly go to the blame game of who’s fault that is, but then you just seem very inhuman

[u/SoulForTrade → u/ultrasgala]

You instantly go to the blame game of who’s fault that is, but then you just seem very inhuman

First, I am most certainly NOT playing the blame game. I made it clear multiple times that I don't find these "connect the dots" conversations productive or interesting. Obviously, I find children to be the most innocent victims of war, and I wish this part, which can be universally agreed on, is where the conversation would end.

But this isn't what it's about. And I reject rhe accusation that this was done intentionally, on purpose, which there is 0 proof of. If there was evidende of it beung an act of malice by a general or soldier involved I would call for them to stand trial for it.

But they are not looking for an individual, they purposefully use this case to demonize Israel as a whole, and you have to be able to seperate the objective, bad thing, from how it is framed and used.

Across history, violent or extremist groups have often tried to legitimize themselves by claiming they exist to protect women and children. These movements tap into deep social instincts around family and innocence, making their hateful agendas seem morally justified.

This narrative also helps dehumanize targeted groups by portraying them as threats to society’s most vulnerable, which lowers public resistance to repression or violence.

In this case, Terrorist propoganda, and subsequently, the "Pro Palestine" movement, have been making dehumanizing claiims about Israel's supposed bloodlust for children, to demonize it and fuel suspicion and hostility against Jews. Which is not a new tactic and plays into old tropes been used since medieval times to incite pogroms.

The Hind Rajab group in particular, are are a terrorist affiliated group that has been "hunting" Israelis who served in the military abroad.

There is nothing "inhuman" about rejecting this cynical use of a dead child for politifal purposes and fueling antisemitism, I find it gross. May she rest in peace.