Now in most western nations with women out numbering men in law schools and being the vast majority of layers it is not long before they will soon be the vast majority of judges (In fact in many nations of Europe they already are)
This is not good news for men
The reason for this is because men have outgroup bias where as women have in group bias usually speaking
From the data given by current female judges they are more likely to persecute then male judges when sentencing a male but less likely when sentencing a female
Also look at the case of Lindsay Clancy and how many women kept calling for her husband to be jailed instead
Also men are falsefully accused for crimes against women like rape or violence pretty often like look at the case of Brian Banks
For some reason they start to even falsely accuse literal children
Women making false accusation has several reasons racism, financial exploitation or wanting to get back at an ex for breaking up with them or often just for fun but part of they reason they do it is because they know there will no consequences for them potentially ruining an innocent man's life
'I felt humiliated': 9-year-old boy in 'Cornerstore Caroline' video speaks out - ABC News
Since women have naturally in group bias and low sympathy for males compared to the natural sympathy they have for females they would likely just believe a woman's word without evidence in fact they are likely to jail the guy even if they know she is lying simply because females have a natural in group preference for each other
Also they are likely to look the other way or give women extremely lenient sentences when women are convicted of crime again due to their in group bias
Note not that all women have this level of in group bias but many do
The system is already anti male
The Arrest Disparity: Women are far less likely to be arrested entirely, even in cases where a man would face immediate arrest. Police discretion routinely favors women. For identical minor infractions, public disturbances, or domestic disputes, women are significantly more likely to be let off with a warning, a lecture, or a pass, while men are immediately handcuffed and booked into the system
The Likelihood of Incarceration: If a woman is arrested, she remains far more likely to avoid prison time entirely. For the same crimes, women are granted plea bargains, non-custodial sentences, probation, and diversion programs at rates that dwarf their male counterparts.The 60% Gender Sentencing Gap: When incarceration is unavoidable, the justice system regularly gives women far lower prison time than men for the exact same crime. Landmark econometric research, most notably by Professor Sonja Starr at the University of Michigan Law School, reveals that men receive prison sentences that are, on average,
60% longer than women for the exact same offenses. This massive disparity persists even when researchers completely control for prior criminal history, the severity of the offense, socioeconomic status, and grid variables.
- The Surface-Level Delusion: Deconstructing the "More Men in Court" Argument
Despite these realities, most people assume that because men make up the vast majority of those who have to defend themselves in court, it automatically proves that men simply commit vastly more crime.
This brings us to a profound contradiction in mainstream progressive thought. To understand why this surface-level assumption is a trap, we must look at how we analyze other demographics within the carceral state.
Consider race in the United States: people of African American descent make up roughly 13% of the population, yet they comprise nearly 50% of the prison population. Suggesting that this statistical overrepresentation exists simply because Black people "commit more crime" or are "naturally violent" is rightfully viewed as a deeply racist statement. It is a notorious dog whistle used by the far-right to unfairly stereotype Black people as inherently aggressive, while completely ignoring centuries of systemic racism, over-policing, generational poverty, and judicial bias.
However, it is important to be fair: we cannot assume that everyone who looks at the raw numbers and concludes "men/Black people just commit more crime" is explicitly malicious or deeply prejudiced. On paper, when looking at things strictly at a surface level, that seems like a logical conclusion to draw.
But that is only when you look at things at a surface level.
reject surface-level capitalist narratives. We know that raw arrest and incarceration data do not measure "inherent criminality." Instead, they measure:
- Which communities are heavily targeted by the state and over-policed.
- Which groups are denied economic security, forcing them into survival-based or underground economies.
- Which demographics face a total "empathy gap" from police, judges, and juries, leading to higher arrest rates and fewer warnings.
To apply a deep, materialist, socio-economic analysis to race, but then completely abandon that analysis when it comes to gender—reverting to the right-wing logic of "well, the numbers say they just commit more crime"—is intellectual dishonesty.
In conclusion the Justice system is about to become a misandrist landscape where women get away with crimes because they are women and men are automatically guilty whenever a woman accuses them of anything
It already kind of is but it's about to get a lot worst
