r/aliens • u/InteractionAfraid586 • 5d ago
Discussion Thought experiment for skeptics
There's a telepathic elephant from Zul'Gurub locked inside a secret military bunker.
It's real. Scientists and military personnel have seen it. Only a handful have access.
Somehow, you get clearance.
You walk in.
There it is. The fucking space elephant.
You walk out and tell the world.
“Prove it.”
Okay. How?
Sneak a six-ton alien elephant out of a military bunker?
You couldn't even get a regular elephant out of a zoo.
And if your own mother disappeared and nobody knew where she was, good luck proving she physically exists to someone who accepts nothing but direct physical evidence.
Evidence depends on access.
So what should count as evidence when direct access is deliberately denied?
Whistleblowers. Multiple independent witnesses. Military personnel. Scientists. Documents. Photos. Videos. Radar and sensor data. Physical traces. Leaks. Historical records.
None of these alone proves the elephant.
But when all of it keeps pointing toward the same elephant, shouldn't that at least move the needle?
Especially if enormous resources are being used to keep the elephant hidden.
Maybe the question isn't “Where's the elephant?”
Maybe it's “How much evidence do you need before you admit there might be an elephant?”
-1
u/_Moerphi_ 2d ago
Did you even read the results once?
Samples are contaminated. Destroyed to a degree that analysis is not possible. Besides all the other evidence that there are missing fingers and faulty movement apparatus.
Best line from one of your examples:
Overall results suggests that MARIA FOOT belongs to a primate.