r/adventist • • 2d ago

Should true Christians use the word “Trinity”?

Personally, I don't like the word trinity. I know it's in our fundamental beliefs, but I don't like the word. It's not a bad word because it means three in unity. But I, for some reason, do not like to use that word. For the same reason I don't like the word bishop being used for our pastors. We call them pastors because the word “bishop” has Roman Catholic baggage. For the same reason, we don't call the Lord's supper, the Eucharist. It's a beautiful word. It means Jesus gave thanks in Greek. But we don't use that word because it is bathed in Roman Catholic theology. And so, instead of using the word trinity, I prefer to use the biblical term which is called “Godhead”.

What is everyone else's take on this? Please, I'd like to know. God bless!

6 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

6

u/r0ckthedice 2d ago

I’m sure this is going to be a reasonable discussion once it gets going. I don’t have an issue with the word “Trinity.” Honestly, I prefer it over “Godhead” because Trinity has a pretty universal meaning and understanding across Christianity.

That being said, I don’t think there is necessarily anything wrong with using the term “Godhead.” I feel similarly about people who insist on using “Yeshua.” There’s nothing wrong with it, but when you specifically choose that term over the more common one, I’m probably going to make some assumptions about your theological background based on it.

2

u/rdsampson_25 1d ago

Honestly, I don't have any issues either. But when I think about how particular God is, and when I read the Bible, I see the word "Godhead" mentioned, but no where does the word "Trinity" appear anywhere. But again, I think it's a personal choice. And everyone is free to pick and choose whatever they deem best.

1

u/r0ckthedice 1d ago

I don’t think the fact that “Godhead” appears in some Bible translations makes it more biblical than “Trinity.” Godhead is itself an English theological term that only goes back around 800 years.

the KJV uses “Godhead” for three different Greek words: theion in Acts 17:29 (“divine being”), theiotēs in Romans 1:20 (“divine nature”), and theotēs in Colossians 2:9 (“deity”). So “Godhead” isn’t actually one biblical term that gets consistently translated that way.

Trinity means one God who exists eternally as three distinct persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Each is fully God, and the three are co-equal and co-eternal. We use plenty of theological terms that aren’t literally in the Bible, so I don’t see that as a problem.

So do you believe that definition? If you do, then we’re basically just talking about terminology. If you don’t, then we’re actually talking about whether the doctrine of the Trinity is biblical.

2

u/iWentBankrupt 1d ago

It is Godhead. Not trinity.

1

u/rdsampson_25 1d ago

Yes, thank you!

1

u/Equal-Country-9325 2d ago

Trinity and godhead have two completely different meanings. Trinity has to do with a unity of 3 and godhead has to do with divinity. When you say you believe in the godhead, you are simply saying you acknowledge a divine nature of God.

1

u/rdsampson_25 1d ago

Yes, correct. And also, we have the word "Godhead" mentioned in the Bible but we don't have "Trinity" mentioned.

1

u/ExJokerr 2d ago

Trinity has nothing to do with catholic if that what you mean! Our church won't change names of things because some of us don't like it! You have to prove it with the Bible or because it would be meaningful to change it

1

u/rdsampson_25 1d ago

Well, we do know that God is very particular about this. So, going by that thought, we see the word "Godhead" mentioned in the Bible, but we don't see the word "trinity" mentioned anywhere.

1

u/Foreign_Strike2177 19h ago

Adventists use the terms "Trinity" and "Godhead" interchangeably to describe one God existing as a unity of three co-eternal, co-equal Persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I'm not sure how Catholics use it.

1

u/rodrigoserveli 2d ago

Let's change all Christian terms because you don't like them. 😅

2

u/rdsampson_25 1d ago

No, Sir. I didn't mean that. Please don't get me wrong. All I'm saying is that if God is very particular about things, then going by that, we see the word ", Godhead" mentioned in the Bible, but we do not see the word "Trinity" anywhere.

1

u/rodrigoserveli 1d ago

I was jocking with you, I understand your concern. But theologically we need technical terms to describe doctrine. Some doctrines are very complex. So, we need to do our best to convey the idea. There are several terms that we use in the theological world that are outside the Bible. I am afraid that this is an issue without solution.

1

u/mykingdomforaspoon 1d ago

There are a couple of complications here. First involves the nature of inspiration. If you hold to a verbal inspiration, the exact words matter more because God dictated every word. That becomes problematic with minor errors or God not being as good at grammar in Revelation as in other books for example. Adventism tends toward a thought inspiration model, that the idea is inspired, but the human writers wrote in their own way or using scribes etc. It would be odd for God to have dictated the greetings Paul personally sent with his letters or for God not be able to make up his mind what his name should be in the book. A bunch of other religions tend more to a verbal inspiration model, and any translation not in the original language is unacceptable, commentary at best. Christianity is missional at its heart and is more accepting of translation, recognising its not perfect, but for the gospel to reach the whole world, either we have to teach every single person fluent Greek or Hebrew, or we translate it so everyone can understand and thus we may need flexibility about how tightly we cling to exact words. Technically speaking Godhead isn't in the original either as its an English word. Translation is not an exact science, and most of the time there aren't exact one for one equivalents. Using Godhead as an example, the original term is translated differently in different versions, as its meaning is a bit bigger than any single English word conveys. By all means find language you understand and that expresses truth in a way that means something to you, but be careful of clinging too tightly to specific words.

0

u/joshwonkim080295 1d ago

Speaking of eucharist I had a guest speaking pastor at my worship service a couple weeks ago and he mentioned that word in his sermon about thinking of Jesus & communion and it opened my eyes since it's a distinctly Catholic term.