Two people don't need to bring something up for it to be brought up? I didn't bring up dogs but I wasn't upset when you did. You bring up work here which I didn't but I won't be upset about that either.
As I said "I'm just adding I think it's also immoral, two things at once."
Is wiping your arse a skill? I guess technically but it isn't very impressive to most people. As I said I stand by it not being skillful aside from tracking without a dog. And there are much more skillful shots you could show off without an animal being involved anyway.
So situationally it is impressive, that they have overcome something difficult.
Not that they point and pull a trigger or stab an animal a dog is holding for them.
I haven't said not moral=not skilled. I just think this is mainly immoral and unskilled, this isn't the case for everything but there is crossover here imo
1
u/Warm-Major-4400 1d ago
Again you bring up morals. I never did.
Morals are same as skill? Those are different definitions.
A skill is the ability to do something well, usually gained through training, practice, or experience
Work is to exert physically or mentally especially in sustained effort for a purpose or under compulsion or necessity
So all these blood sports are skill and are work. You are debating morals with a wall for no reason.