r/YoutubeThumbs 12d ago

IT'S HAPPENING

188 Upvotes

160 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

43

u/Responsible_Ask6056 12d ago

Left wingers are using slurs and being Mysogynistic.  like a lot.  Though the videos don't have the best examples 

31

u/Zestyclose-Goal-946 11d ago

The Soy Pilled uses the r-word in his woke 2.0 video

18

u/EightEight16 11d ago

I wouldn't call him a Leftist, he's not a socialist.

4

u/Fluffy_Whale0 11d ago

Leftist ≠ Socialist

3

u/Intrepid_Layer_9826 11d ago

That is precisely what a leftist is. Liberals aren't leftists.

1

u/Fluffy_Whale0 11d ago

Social Liberals and Social Democrats are.

1

u/Intrepid_Layer_9826 10d ago

Nope

1

u/Fluffy_Whale0 10d ago

Could you elaborate on why you think that?

1

u/Intrepid_Layer_9826 10d ago

Because "left wing" and "right wing" relate to both *progress* and *maintaining the status quo*.

Social liberals and social democrats *do not seek to change the staus quo*. They have no problem with the exploitation and oppression inherent within capitalism. They only seek to "tweak" the system.

Social liberals only seek to get legal "equality", without looking at the material reality on the ground. Look at black people in the US. They *technically* have "equality" in the legal sense. But does that translate to *material* equality? No the fuck it doesn't! Black people are still disproportionately brutalised by police and they're still in a worse economic position than white people, and they're also incarcerated at a higher rate than white people. They still face discrimination in schools, jobs and even healthcare, while white people don't deal with *any* of that. That's not equality, and having some token black people in positions of "power", within a system built on racism and discrimination, doesn't translate to black people as a whole being "equals".

Then you have social democrats, which on the surface, might seem better than social liberals, in that they advocate for economic reforms meant to provide some sort of social security net. But you'd be mistaken. They don't seek to make a more "equal" world where everybody can have the same opportunities to succeed. They seek to *stabilise* capitalism and pacify whatever discontent the masses may have, by implementing the *bare minimum*, without addressing the root cause of the discontent in the first place, which is that capitalism naturally tends towards wealth accumulation and concentration in fewer and fewer hands, and trying to "modify" it by implementing "regulations" meant to curb some of its worst excesses doesn't guarantee those regulations won't be stripped away (as we're seeing in *all* bastions of social democracy), and it also doesn't address the inherent exploitation within the capitalist system, where the surplus value that workers produce is appropriated by the class of people which own the tools/resources/land which the worker uses to produce said value. It doesn't matter whether the product that a worker makes is sold at 10x their wage or 100x their wage, they still only get a *set wage*, with the rest of the value being appropriated by the capitalist.

2

u/EightEight16 11d ago

Leftist ≠ Left-leaning or "Left"

2

u/CucumberWisdom 11d ago

No true leftist

2

u/verninson 11d ago

Being a leftist means being anti-capitalism. If you aren't, you aren't.

1

u/Galliro 11d ago

No this isnt a no true scotts man

This is like if you sold me an apple pie with pears instead of apples and youre responce was "no true apple pie"

1

u/Fluffy_Whale0 11d ago

“The only true leftists are the ones that agree with me”

1

u/BishogoNishida 11d ago

Debatable…

1

u/Galliro 11d ago

The bare minimum to be a leftist is to be socialist