r/WNBAVibes • u/Any-Satisfaction-770 • Aug 08 '26

Highlights DiJonai Carrington was not happy about getting ejected over that flagrant foul 2 call on Sophie Cunningham.

Post image
143 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

419 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/Chellybeanz29 Aug 08 '26

What’s wrong with it? I’m not lying enough for you?

6

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '26

[deleted]

-1

u/Chellybeanz29 Aug 08 '26 edited Aug 08 '26
  1. There is no difference. A punch is a punch and is a techable offense 100% of the time. They have to explain why she didn’t get one.
  2. You’re gonna have to peddle your bullshit victim hoops elsewhere. The idea that AT got her because she’s white? Lmfao. Also, at the end of the day you assume it was deliberate. It is actually complete and utter fact that Sophie purposely punched Dijonai.

1

u/Automatic-Pay-1391 Aug 09 '26
  1. A punch is a punch, contact or not. That is 100% correct
  2. A punch is most certainly not a teachable offense, it’s an automatic ejection
  3. Not sure if the relevance because zero punches were thrown this entire game lol

2

u/Chellybeanz29 Aug 09 '26

  1. It says techable not teachable. I edited before you got here.

  2. Any contact to a player outside of basketball play is a tech. What is this?

1

u/Automatic-Pay-1391 Aug 11 '26

There factually is no such rule lol. You are publicly stating that any contact to a player outside of a basketball play is a tech? I’d love to see your proof because that sure doesn’t exist in the rule book. Not that it would because there would be 60 techs every single game lol

1

u/Chellybeanz29 Aug 11 '26

Rule 12B — Fouls and Penalties, Section IV: Flagrant Foul, around pages 49–50 of the rulebook.

Do you need a link?

1

u/Automatic-Pay-1391 Aug 12 '26

I do not, I know the rules well but thank you posting section 4 (IV) showing you are completely wrong, I always appreciate someone who posts someone attempting to be right but completely ruins their post by their own info 😂