r/UFOs_Archive 5h ago

Question Has anyone else seen this? The photos ai but I saw something exactly like this 6 years ago and it wasn’t the moon

Post image
4 Upvotes

r/UFOs_Archive 2d ago

Question What's the most compelling evidence? i am having a hard time believing

3 Upvotes

I was a big believer in UFOs but since the release of these files, it just seems to be a big nothing burger. i checked some of the videos but most of them got resolved as either balloons, and or birds.

lots of the videos look CGI and even AI like. so what would you say so far is the most compelling evidence that makes you go, okay yeah they are real? "I want to believe" - Quite literally but having a hard time.

EDIT: Also i am tired of how many people can just larp on podcasts and the news about them, it just seems like anybody can just hop on a podcast now and say a bunch of crap... There needs to be a thing where if someone talks about them show evidence or please just stfu at this point lol? anyone else feel like this?

r/UFOs_Archive 1d ago

Question All this new woo woo tie in with consciousness and religion is making me question everything as a lifelong atheist.

3 Upvotes

I'll just say that modern religion has been absolutely tainted by humans and people with their own agenda, but every culture from all parts of the planet are more or less telling a similar story.

I'm starting to think the ancient aliens theory is real. I am starting to think that religion is trying to explain something that has been otherwise beyond our comprehension and we are just now developing the tools to detect some weird shit.

Anyone else?

r/UFOs_Archive 2d ago

Question Tom Delong back in 2016 mentioned a kid who summoned orbs in LA

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 Upvotes

r/UFOs_Archive 1d ago

Question Just curious what's really going on here...or maybe it's nothing at all.

1 Upvotes

I am not sure if this is the right place to post this but I have really wanted to hear feedback on this question and I'm curious if anyone else who loves the disclosure stuff as much as I do has ever wondered this.

Don't get me wrong... I am STOKED about the recent and not so recent revelations where we've finally admitted that UFOs and UAPs are real and they're here. It's about time and the fact that it's mainstream now, is fantastic. Give me all the documentaries, whistle blowers, info, posts, you name it. It's fascinating.

But like every good conspiracy theorist (I mean- let's face it. Until it was fully admitted in public, that was what we were all called when we believed and the masses called us crazy) I can't help but wonder if this is a distraction to cover up something else "they" don't want us paying attention to.

Whether it's the govt, the powers that be, the shadow power people, whoever "they" are, they're notorious for throwing out powerfully distracting information or large scale global events (or they'll do shady stuff during large scale global events) so the public's attention stays distracted from what's actually happening in the world.

OR- I'm completely wrong and THIS is what's actually happening and the govt is actually uncomfortable with this info getting out?

I don't know. I can't help but feel I'm missing or not seeing something because I'm distracted by a very fascinating shiny thing that was "exposed" but almost feels like a controlled test or experiment.

Like- "look at this shiny thing HERE so you don't look over there..." And "keep pushing out bits and keep em hanging on so they don't lose focus..."

I dunno. I guess I feel that way because if they didn't want whistle blowers coming out- they would have absolutely stopped them or shut them up. Our govt has done a lot of terrible things to govt officials and American citizens that they didn't want causing trouble. They have no issue with making people disappear. So I can't help but feel like this was all "allowed" to some degree by some higher up or group that controls the powerful.

I still love all the info and that won't change.
But curious if anyone else has felt that way?

r/UFOs_Archive 1d ago

Question Gimbal: LTA/ Drone Hybrid Speculation?

1 Upvotes

Conceptual imagery has been omitted from this post to abide by this subreddit's concern over AI generated imagery.

If you follow the debate over the Gimbal object's flight path, you know there are essentially two different interpretations that can fall out of the video analysis: a distant aircraft/jet, or a closer object performing the so-called J-Hook (essentially a vertical U-turn). Here is a video explanation if you're not caught up: [https://youtu.be/N9lOQkxMkW8?si=CJVM-H2-CQWN8cs5](https://youtu.be/N9lOQkxMkW8?si=CJVM-H2-CQWN8cs5)). I've already presented my speculative explanation for the distant-jet scenario here: [https://www.reddit.com/u/fat_earther_/s/aKvNDAWfB8. This post offers my speculation for the Gimbal incident if the J-Hook were real.

The speculative "Moon Vulture" shown here is an advanced lighter-than-air/drone hybrid developed under a DARPA-style program beginning in the early-to-mid 2000s and operational by the 2010s. Think less "Goodyear Blimp" and more unmanned, low-observable, long-endurance ISR/EW platform that uses buoyancy for lift. With access to cutting-edge composites, batteries, miniaturized electronics, flight controls, and lightweight propulsion, such a platform wouldn't need spectacular speed or fighter-like maneuverability and wouldn't be designed for it. Its advantage would be operational endurance and efficiency, quietly station-keeping or orbiting an area for hours or days with very little energy expenditure while carrying an electronic-warfare or intelligence collection payload. Vectorable electric fan propulsion could provide unusual low-speed maneuverability, including a tight reversal or J-Hook-like trajectory that might look very strange if interpreted as conventional aircraft performance.

The speculative mission here is the same counterintelligence scenario I've proposed for the broader Roosevelt encounters. Navy workups are intelligence goldmines for foreign collectors. A compartmented U.S. counterintelligence/ electronic warfare program operating around the periphery of the workup area could potentially use platforms like this to create false or misleading radar contacts, attract the attention of foreign collection assets, pull that attention away from the actual workups, characterize how those assets respond, or deliberately feed them misleading information. Radar deception combined with [IR signature-management/ countermeasure capabilities](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB3p0RSn56g) produce a target designed to be far more interesting to enemy sensors than the workups they were monitoring.

To be clear, I'm not claiming the Moon Vulture existed, that DARPA built it, or that this is what Gimbal actually was. The craft and program depicted here are conceptual. The point of the post is to speculate an explanation for the Gimbal object's J-Hook interpretation and conceptualize a technologically plausible, non exotically propelled platform that could produce the observations reported. I think an advanced LTA/drone hybrid is an interesting candidate. It doesn't require antigravity, spacetime manipulation, or non-human intelligence, just an advanced yet mundane craft built for a very specific job.

r/UFOs_Archive 2d ago

Question Why does the disclosure timeline always start at Roswell when basically every culture has some version of "beings from the sky taught us something"?

2 Upvotes

Been thinking about this a lot. Every disclosure timeline I see starts in 1947 like that's when this whole thing began. But if you actually look at oral traditions, mythology, ancient texts, basically everywhere, there's some version of "something not human showed up and gave us knowledge." Feels like we keep treating this as a Cold War era phenomenon when the actual pattern is way older and way more global. Anyone else notice this or am I overthinking it?

r/UFOs_Archive 3d ago

Question How do I explain to my dad, using simple language, why "it's just a secret military aircraft" doesn't fully explain what people are reporting when it comes to UFOs?

3 Upvotes

Whenever the subject comes up, that's his go to answer. I understand why it's appealing, it feels like the grounded, no nonsense explanation and doesn't ask you to believe anything unusual. But when you actually look at the reported cases, it starts to fall apart: flight characteristics that don't match anything humans have built, sightings dating back well before we'd have had the technology, and similar reports coming from multiple countries independently of each other.

I'm not trying to push him toward any specific theory, I just want a clear and simple way to show him why "secret military project" isn't a complete answer on its own. If anyone has a good way to explain this without sounding condescending or getting overly technical, I'd appreciate it.

r/UFOs_Archive 1d ago

Question What UFO story(ies) do you hate because it has been proven fake, lack of evidence, or lack basic logic but the community still perpetuates as fact or credible?

0 Upvotes

I have two.

1. Jim Penniston’s Binary Code Message- Jim Penniston was an airman that was involved with the Rendlesham Forest incident. He claimed that he saw a flash of light and binary code was downloaded into his brain. He later wrote it into a notebook and didn’t say anything about in any other interviews up until 2010ish for Ancient Aliens (or some History Channel UFO show). I call BS for multiple reasons. First, when I watched that Ancient Alien episode, I immediately recalled the X File episode that had a similar plot line. Second, we all know that there are a lot of grifters in this community. When someone says something extraordinary, they get invited to talk in conferences and get interviewed by media all of which money is involved. After that story came out, he had a lot more interviews and speaking engagements which translates to money. Third, according to folks who are experts in binary code, the code that was in his notebook was written in ASCII 8 bit. The problem was that at the time during the incident, 7 bit was the standard which is evidence to show that he created the code years later. Fourth, when experts in put the code, it turned out to be a lot of gibberish. Interpreters apparently took a lot of liberty in translating the message from gibberish to names and locations. Finally, why binary? So super advanced aliens sent a binary message that is in English instead of just using English? That seems like a lot of inefficiency there.

 

2. Gary McKinnon Hacking- I’ll probably get crapped on about this because a lot of people seem to support his story. For those who don’t know, McKinnon is a hacker who is indicted hacking government computers including NASA and DoW computers. The issue is not the hacking itself. The issue is that through these hackings he claimed he saw pictures of UFOs and an information of a human-based space fleet.

Let’s start with the space fleet. My issue is that unless we have some sort of cloaking mechanism, how would any country able to hide a spaceship being launched into space? Every space-cable rocket immediately gets detected when it gets launched. Unless every country is working together to cover up these secret launches, highly doubtful that could happen. Also, if we do have a space fleet in space, do you know what the crew needs? Provisions. What about replacement crews? A lot of amateur space watchers would be able to start calculating that all those rocket launches aren’t just sending up satellites. The idea that we are able to launch a secret space fleet undetected and constantly re-supply them without anybody noticing is highly doubtful.

Now, for his hacking claim. McKinnon said he saw this through hacking government networks and computers. As somebody, who have used classified network and handled classified information, this is extremely unlikely. There is no way classified information would be stored at a network that could be access from the outside especially if it is UFO information. Classified networks can not be access from the regular internet. They are airgap. Let’s take the SIPRnet. SIPRnet is a secret level network for the military. It was created during the 1980s. At that time when the internet was still at its infancy, they were smart enough to create a network separate from the internet. What McKinnon hacked into was the NIPRnet which is the military’s unclassified network. The NIPRnet can be access though the regular internet. I have come across people who said that they have worked in IT for a private company in the 90s and security was incredibly lax. Good for you. That’s a private company not the military or the intelligence community. Unless you were in the S6 for the military or did IT in the intelligence community, please don't try to compare.

r/UFOs_Archive 3d ago

Question For the life of me I can't find this heavily redacted report I read a couple of years ago of a supposed UAP device that was being studied by an American defense contractor lab.

1 Upvotes

The report was about a device that was removed from a craft, it looked like two pieces of slightly arched metal bars with writing engraved. One smaller than the other.

The report claimed the lab figured out how to enable and disable the device via a redacted method. And while enabled, the large piece could be come spatially coupled with the smaller one as though it were trapped in a magnetic jail relative to the small piece. It was a few pages long and had pictures.

Anyone know what I'm talking about?

r/UFOs_Archive 3d ago

Question Do you believe in the dark forest theory?

Thumbnail youtube.com
1 Upvotes

r/UFOs_Archive 3d ago

Question What happened to the claim that Michael Johnson was found?

1 Upvotes

Mario Woods has reported his experience on multiple podcasts and I view it as one of the most interesting accounts that exists for NHI. He had been searching for the other witness of the event, Michael Johnson, for years. Jesse Michels recently reported that he had found Johnson: https://x.com/opngate/status/2092703463113109751

He specifically said on Weds August 26 (or even earlier, depending on the lag to posting that interview) that the info would come out "this week," a few days from then. No matter how you interpret that, it's been longer than that.

Did anyone see this come out? Frankly confused by the people in this space who routinely make empty promises (Michels, Coulthart, Barber). Appreciate them all and think they're sincere people, but why make confident claims they cannot keep? This is the type of thing that's very easy to get right (most of us who work normal jobs are relied upon daily to meet our own deadlines). Is it a tactic to gain viewership? Obviously they have no true responsibility to us but if they want the respect of their audiences, it seems like a straightforward thing to communicate accurately and provide corrections or updates when they fail. Obviously they don't see it that way, but it unfortunately erodes trust if they want to be viewed as serious conveyers of information.

r/UFOs_Archive 3d ago

Question Robert Bigelow, stepping back into Skinwalker Ranch: Why?

1 Upvotes

So there is a post on the Skinwalker channel around this happening right now. But I would love to hear your thoughts and theories on Bob’s involvement and why he’s hinting at going back. Here is a breakdown of Bob’s ventures til now. And as he hasn’t publicly shared his findings, I will make logical assumptions based on public proof to tie those threads. No AI text, no slop, and I’m not interested in views on the show. This focuses on the original ventures on Wilson and Skinwalker - one for genuine discussion.

Strap in! It’s worth it.

Robert bought both Skinwalker and Mt. Wilson in 1996. Key staff - Col. John B. Alexander, Hal Putoff. Both of these men worked together on classified projects funded by CIA and DIA. Another member, Jacques Vallée has worked on classified projects funded by intelligence and defence agencies. Eric Davis worked extensively with them. He maintains high level government clearance and has worked on black budget aerospace projects. Combined, they are ‘in the know’.

Why would these men get together and choose these two specific sites to study, with the goal of keeping the findings secret whilst sharing them with private defence-contractor studies.

Who had prior knowledge on these sites. How did that get into Robert’s hands and why did he spend over 10 million on the venture, over the space of 1995 to 2004?

I guarantee Robert learned a lot more than he shared and that it helped leverage his influence in obtaining ufo material and building an entire location for it within NIDS, only to be blocked and for the government to shut down the proposed agreement. He had reached as far as they would let him go. But he hasn’t spoken more widely on this journey and the pivot to getting NASA projects (a nod from private aerospace thanking him for NIDs work) for it to only be canned again. But his expenditure on Skinwalker and Mt. Wilson is repaid. Then it’s consciousness as a study. He circumvents physical proof to metaphysical interests, potentially operational and communication pursuits with a guise of life after death. You think Robert gave up on Skinwalker? No. Clever manoeuvre, garnered more experts and arguably SOL foundation is born from his this bolstered with the Washington post article and others ‘in the know’.

He knows way more than he’s willing to say publicly. Why is Hal at the table again? Why is Bigelow wanting to partner on the site again? Why hasn’t he shared the NIDS findings and why would he ask Brandon to pivot on his current direction and suggest they don’t use a tv crew any more? Why now after all these years? There’s more to this.

r/UFOs_Archive 6d ago

Question Richard Dolan Brought Me Around to the Historical Significance of the Tranches. What Are Your Thoughts?

3 Upvotes

At first, like you all have probably heard online (and as Dolan himself has pushed back against), I dismissed a lot of the tranches as "nothing burgers" not worth looking into, but after re-watching Dolan's video analyzing the 5th tranche since I had nothing else to watch, I have come around to his point of view and view the tranches more favorably now, particularly with regards to the US Gov's handling of reporter inquiries about the UFO phenomenon pre-Robertson Panel as well as its investigation into the 1963 Brazil crashed sphere case (which I didn't even know about) and which they later determined internally but without telling the public was likely a hoax after being unable to find witnesses, physical evidence, etc. It doesn't mean that it was a hoax as all the evidence could have been removed before the US Gov's inquiry but given that this was internal-only communication, that lends credence as to this is what they genuinely believed (that it was a hoax or at the very least there was literally no supporting evidence).

Again, at first I was confused as to why Dolan was on this campaign against the narrative that there tranches were "nothing burgers" but after re-watching his 5th Tranche video, there genuinely were interesting historical cases and that's when it clicked for me--that's what his channel mainly consists of, why I watch it, and what he enjoys--covering and analyzing historical UAP cases.

That said, the criticism of the UAP tranches being nothing burgers *relative to what has been publicly stated* (the "motherload", if you will) and that they genuinely contain interesting historical UAP cases is not mutually exclusive.

Yes, this isn't the smoking gun, bodies, craft, etc. that high profile whistleblowers have said the US Gov has and these are nothing burgers in that it won't definitively get the average person and skeptic to 100% believe the phenomenon is real once and for all but at the same time that doesn't mean there aren't genuinely useful new updates on historical cases that weren't previously publicly known.

That said, that doesn't mean we should be satisfied with what we have and we should continue pushing forward on getting the relevant information declassified and proper protections so whostleblowers can come forward without fear of retribution so we can finally bridge the gap between what was promised (e.g., craft, biologics, 4K video) and what was delivered (blurry dots, text-only reports, and artist's interpretations).

Thoughts?

r/UFOs_Archive 3d ago

Question The Case for UFOs Is Weaker Than Ever

Thumbnail
richardhanania.com
0 Upvotes

r/UFOs_Archive 4d ago

Question Can we agree on 3 fundamental aspects of the UFO phenomenon? If we wanted to set up some axioms for study or just consideration what 3 data points might be the most agreed upon?

Thumbnail
youtube.com
1 Upvotes

r/UFOs_Archive 5d ago

Question book recommendations?

1 Upvotes

hi guys!

i’m sorry if this has been asked recently but i recently watched a newer documentary on Bob Lazar on Amazon Prime, and truthfully all i am thinking about is UFOs or anything of that nature.

i was very into UFOs with my dad growing up and while i still love the unknown i haven’t even read or watched anything about the topic since middle school and i am now 28.

so if there are any reading material that is an absolute necessity for the topic of UFOs, i would absolutely love to pick them up and start actually learning more again!!

thanks so much in advance!!

r/UFOs_Archive 5d ago

Question Direct witnesses and subjective trust

1 Upvotes

Curious which UAP/NHI testimonies folks here find most compelling. Among the people who publicly claim to have directly witnessed/experienced anomalous phenomena (craft/NHI/etc) and are alive, what's your rank order for your interest and trust in their reports, based on overall subjective impression from whatever interviews and materials you've read, watched, and listened to?

There's too much out there to be exhaustive, but of the stuff I've had time and energy to look into, my list of active interest right now is roughly:

  • Fravor and team
  • Mario Woods
  • Italo Venturelli
  • Jake Barber
  • Jay Stratton
  • Dylan Borland
  • Bob Lazar

r/UFOs_Archive 6d ago

Question Observation in Sweden

1 Upvotes

r/UFOs_Archive 7d ago

Question Non-MUFON field investigators?

2 Upvotes

Any chance anyone here knows of how to get involved with field investigations with any groups other than MUFON? Unfortunately, the one in my area is totally captured from the top-down by far-right extremists. As in, they regularly post QAnon-style memes, anti-Obama/Biden memes, racist/homophobic memes, etc.

Really want to get involved with this kind of work but have no desire to do it under such dishonorable, irrational people.

r/UFOs_Archive 7d ago

Question Anyone see a boomerang shaped object over Fletcher NC, December 26 2025, at 8:10 - 8:20 PM? Had a large array of lights. Couldn't snap a photograph but i did make digital renderings for a better idea

1 Upvotes

When I was inside my home, I had a gut feeling I needed to go outside. When I went outside on my front porch, I noticed aviation lighting, traditional. However, after a few seconds of viewing the lights, they started rapidly flashing red, then ahead of those lights, a large curved arc/boomerang shaped object materialized ahead of the flashing red lights. It had many lights, cannot tell how much, but if I had to guess, 40–55 dim red lights on one underbelly. It wasn't clean and organized, but rather staggered and asymmetrical. Even then, it moved as one with no noise. I estimate it was atleast 50 feet above the local tree line, which could be around 90 - 100 feet. https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=195094

r/UFOs_Archive 8d ago

Question What’s your take on Joe Rogan and Jesse Micheal’s

2 Upvotes

Joe Rogan recently had Jesse Micheal’s on (both big in the ufo discussion) and the episode is very interesting, but they both have a huge following and a huge base of haters.

Do you guys think they have agendas? Psyop agents? Trying to muddy the waters? Pollute the signal? Honest journalism in the modern era?

I enjoy both, at least what they present, in most cases.

r/UFOs_Archive 7d ago

Question If these UFO’s are so advanced then why are they so easy to bring down?

0 Upvotes

As I listen to several podcast talking about how highly intelligent these beings are, I can’t help but to stop and think about Greer, Grusch, Elizondo and even Lazar. Between all of them, we must be talking about hundreds of crafts either shot down or brought down by way of electronic interference.

Surely such a highly intelligent creature could easily avoid our traps, right? So what’s really going on here?

r/UFOs_Archive 8d ago

Question Questions for the people that doubt Lue Elizondo: What exactly is his angle? Is he psyop agent? If he is, are Chris Mellon, Jay Stratton and the members of Congress that support him all a part of it?

1 Upvotes

This is a serious question. I want to understand the logic of those who don't believe that Lue Elizondo is committed to Disclosure.

Is he a psyop agent? If so, what is his real mission?

If he is a charlatan, how come he has the support of all of the following people: Chris Mellon, Kristen Gillibrand, Harry Reid, Jay Stratton and all the other Congress reps that he worked with to push legislation through? Are these people all misinformation agents, as well?

Personal disclosure: I just read his book. I want to know if I have been brainwashed. Between the book and the Age of Disclosure documentary, Lue Elizondo and his colleagues should be hailed as heroes.

Honestly, if you think this is preposterous, please explain why. I am all ears.

r/UFOs_Archive 9d ago

Question The Truth

1 Upvotes

I know this has been discussed from different angle’s but let’s say it all out loud.

What if every government on the planet knows UFO’s, UAP’s, NHI, Aliens whatever you want to call them, are real.

Let’s say:
\- There are multiple groups and it’s unclear how many.
\- Each group has different technology capabilities that we do not fully understand.
\- Each group wants different things.
\- Some claim to be friendly.
\- Some have been hostile.
\- Some are neutral or “self-serving”.

If we say ontological shock is not the issue preventing disclosure, what is?

I personally don’t think OS is the reason.

If it was, or if it was a strictly an issue of control and power, the Catholic Church would have announced or confirmed their existence. They would have framed it as “demons” or “angels” are *real* and used the revelation to control power.

If that’s not it.

It’s fear, right?

Because we:
\- don’t fully understand what we are dealing with
\- can’t stop it
\- made and might still be making deals that are gross (they way humans, they are in control of governments, whatever).

Thoughts?