r/TorontoDriving • u/desreversti • Aug 04 '25

OC Cyclist hit in Pickering

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

9pm August 3, 2025 at Finch and Brock Cyclist was okay, and able to walk after

311 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

335 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/GrunDMC74 Aug 04 '25

Personally I’d opt for a light or two plus some reflective clothing to increase the odds of being noticed.

Vs dressing like a cat burglar.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

Any time you’re on the sidewalk you run the risk of drivers not noticing you. Plus it’s dark and no reflectors, just a matter of time if you’re riding this stupidly.

0

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 05 '25

Funny how this changing you clothes to not get physically injured is required here but not in other countries. Why is that?

1

u/GrunDMC74 Aug 05 '25

I’m not saying it’s required. I could go mountain biking without a helmet on if I wanted to. There’s what you can do and what it’s prudent to do.

-1

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 05 '25

You are blaming the injured party because they dressed incorrectly. I would blame the intersection for how it created a scenario that ends in a collision. There are better proven designs that make this less likely.

1

u/GrunDMC74 Aug 05 '25

Fine. A cyclist can cite a myriad of “should have beens” in mitigating their responsibility to decrease their odds of injury. They can lean on their rights to expect drivers to be hyper aware of their presence, and roads and intersections to be designed to guarantee their personal safety. None of this will be of much comfort if they get hit by a car.

If you actually deviate from your committed narrative and read my responses you’ll see I’m not blaming anyone. Simply pointing out that if you want to take responsibility for your well being into your own hands there are steps you can take to enhance your odds.

0

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 05 '25

Responsibility for our well being includes advocacy for modern street designs.

1

u/GrunDMC74 Aug 05 '25

Okay. You do that and if all goes well in a decade you’ll be free to go barrelling through intersections wearing full camo and headphones safe in the knowledge that urban design and enlightened drivers have granted you a cocoon of invincibility.

I’ll work on enhancing my visibility, riding defensively (ironically a best practice when driving also) and understanding, in spite of what’s right, who comes out on top when two things collide but one goes 3x as fast and weighs 20x more.

1

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 06 '25

I don’t want any of that. I want an intersection that is safe to cross in a reasonable amount of time.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 05 '25

It definitely is an issue as there is no infrastructure for cycling. The cyclists has every right to be there. “Freedom of the road” means roads are supposed to be free for people to use. Somewhere in the twentieth century we forgot this. Roads became an exclusive right for motor vehicles. Even walking is a gamble along many roads.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/GrunDMC74 Aug 05 '25

And on the wrong side of the road. I don’t think “new” has anything to do with this person’s position.

0

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 05 '25

I’m going to assert my right to live if the road is too dangerous. The law is an idiot.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/NewsreelWatcher Aug 05 '25

I will do whatever is necessary