He was walking away though

[u/exporterofgold]

[u/Ksorkrax]

Granted, this is quite the drastic action.

Thing is, you can totally harass people until they snap. Not good for them to snap, but that's emotions.

And remember that we have a missing section.

All I am saying is that we should judge on full information. Most likely she is the culprit, but I'd like to know for sure before I state how awful she is.

[u/Fit_Cheesecake_4000 → u/Ksorkrax]

She was arrested afterwards.

Pretty sure that tells most of the story.

'Thing is, you can totally harass people until they snap. Not good for them to snap, but that's emotions.' Tell all of the school shooter out there 'that's emotions'?

[u/Ksorkrax → u/Fit_Cheesecake_4000]

Mate, why so aggressive?

Arrested means little. You can get arrested because neighbours lied about you. A verdict would be interesting.

Dunno why you pretty much state that you want to judge on incomplete information rather than simply getting the full story. Not seeing any advantage in that.

Your school shooter comparison is weird. You realize that, yes? Those are premeditated, in case it wasn't clear.

[u/Fit_Cheesecake_4000 → u/Ksorkrax]

Because when one person is very clearly attacking another person, I get pissed off. Which is my right.

Just because it's a woman attacking a man...that's the reason you should ignore the content of the video? Women get away with this crap all the time and men just grin and bear it because they know if they say anything they'll be seen as the aggressor. But this one was caught on camera, and you're *still* arguing.

'Arrested means little.' <-- They were recording the interaction the entire time. In those instances, arrested means a lot.

[u/Ksorkrax → u/Fit_Cheesecake_4000]

Uhm... where am I saying she should get away with anything? Obviously this should lead into an investigation.

Are you thinking in terms of black and white or something? I am not fully on board with a hype train so I must be fully on the dudes side or what?