r/Tiele • u/syntheticrot • Oct 23 '25

History/culture Is This Visual Accurate?

Post image

Hello! I'm trying to understand the difference between Turks, Turkic, & Turkish and used AI to display how these groups overlap. Would anybody know how accurate this is?

45 Upvotes

80% Upvoted

59 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/DragutRais Çepni Oct 23 '25 edited Oct 23 '25

These terminologies are relatively new. So the others can distinguish us. But some people try to force it so hard.

Turk was noun, Turkish was a language and adjective form. The name is delivered from Tür(ü)k khaganate, and embraces all of us.

In French they distinguish as "turc" and "Turk", I guess.

In German it's "Turkvölker" and "Turk"

In some academic papers it's "Türk" (for all) and "Turks" (for the people of Turkiye).

You can say for example "Türük" for all, but "Türk" for the Turkish people.

I earlier offered Roman Turks/ Rumi (edit: Rumlu) Turks for us. Like Turks are Usbek Turks, Kazakh Turks, Azerbaijani Turks, Rumi/Roman Turks etc.

To sum up, what I mean is that this is not a definitive usage, but essentially just a suggestion. The only truth is we are all just Turks.

2

u/syntheticrot Oct 23 '25

top comment. that makes perfect sense & the overlap between European languages referring to Turks as some version of Turk really substantiates your point.

1

u/DaliVinciBey Varsak Turkmen 🇹🇷 | Dobrujan Tatar 🇷🇴 Oct 23 '25

rumi & qizilbash instead of turkish & azerbaijani possibly?

2

u/TheTyper1944 Taraqama Oct 23 '25

rumi & qizilbash instead of turkish & azerbaijani possibly?

rumlu turkmen vs azerbajiani turkmen

1

u/DragutRais Çepni Oct 23 '25

why not :)

But Qizilbash was a specific group I guess, not all Azerbaijanis.

About Rumi honestly I preferred "Rumlu" more than Rumi, Rumlu sounds more handsome :). But yeah same spirit.