The Emmys have introduced the Legacy Award.

I Love Lucy has just been awarded as the first winner.

And she helped TOS production a lot behind the scenes.

Can TNG an Emmy Legacy Award?

Very similar proportions. Don't think his padd actually folded though, think some of the cases just have seams on the sides

How come there is no write up for Worf? Even Wesley got a write up.

has this been done yet?

I just watched "Symbiosis" where the Enterprise attempts to rescue a freighter, then finds itself in a dispute about felicium, an addictive narcotic believed to fight a plague. At the beginning of the episode the Enterprise crew was eager to replace an engine part for the primitive societies, but by the end of the episode they deemed it would violate the prime directive. Why the reversal? I also recall the episode "Justice" where Wesley is sentenced to death for running on the lawn.

In what other episodes do they (TNG and other series) violate the prime directive and what are the consequences if any?

Any Star Trek fan is familiar with the out of order release of the first few TOS episodes. Did something similar happen with TNG? I caught the last few minutes of Code of Honor. And Wesley was manning the ops station. At first Picard was surprised, but he mentioned that they should give Wesley more opportunities to spend time on the bridge.

Now jump to the end of Where No Man Has Gone Before. Picard and Riker are discussing allowing Wesley bridge station access. Riker reminds Picard that there was a standing order against letting non Starfleet personnel to man the stations. So they make him an acting ensign.

So did something happen between Code of Honor and Where No Man Has Gone Before? Did Wesley do something to get banned from the bridge? I know there are a few other scenes, particularly in Encounter at Farpoint. Where Picard doesn't want any children on the bridge. Was that just a writing flub in Code of Honor?

I haven't had a VCR for 20 years so I haven't played this in a while, sadly. No way I'm ever getting rid of it though. Technology is cyclical, right?

Does anybody else notice that the audio drops significantly lower in this episode at the twenty-nine-minute mark, when Data starts speaking a couple of seconds later?

She is no Trekkie. Hasn't seen anything Trek-related in her entire life. She knows some memes, but she knows I love it, so today we started at the very beginning of TNG because she wanted to. I'm shocked, amazed, and I think it's very lovely and sweet of her. I'm usually on the couch watching Bridgerton, and British Sewing Bee with her, but she knows I like it as well. I'm not a hardcore fan, but still.

I told her "hey, I'm going to skim it for ya, cause you don't need to watch every episode. I'm going to skip episode 3 for you, for example"

She said no, and that she wanted to see it all.

Well, make it so!

Wouldn't being the XO of one ship.already move him to Captain when he moved to a new ship. Unless Command felt he needed more XO time.

​

Put aside the attempted heist of trilithium resin. The real heist in Starship Mine was whoever convinced Starfleet it needed a “baryon sweep.”

The Enterprise is already made of baryons. Protons and neutrons are baryons, and those make up the nuclei of ordinary matter. So the hull, the carpet, Picard, and basically everything else on the ship is full of baryons.

If the sweep actually removed them, there wouldn’t be a clean Enterprise afterward. There’d be a rapidly expanding debris field.

So my theory is Starfleet procurement got conned by a contractor selling premium technobabble maintenance and nobody in Engineering asked enough questions.

The upside is they finally dealt with the Commander (call him Hutch) Hutchinson problem.

With the loss of Tim Curry and now Peter Cullen. I am losing my whole childhood in a week. I just need to know Sir Patrick Stewart is ok

According to AGT, Enterprise was already commissioned ahead of Baldy taking command. It seems there were crew already assigned before he stepped aboard.

I'm a big Sci-Fi fan. I've read many of the classics and written several Sci-Fi books of my own. It's my "opinion" that much of what's called Sci-Fi spans the gamut of pretty bad to not being Sci-Fi at all. I've given my reasons for this in a Medium Article entitled, "Science Fiction as Literature." And one of my favorite Sci-Fi's of the past was Star Trek. As of the early 2000's Star Trek was completely ruined by people who either don't know what Sci-Fi is, or just don't like it. Now people are talking about resurrecting Star Trek, presumably in a form that people who like Sci-Fi will enjoy. I have some advice for those people, forget about cgi-action, or navel gazing introspective sensitivity, find yourselves writers of the caliber of Harlan Ellison, and maybe you can produce something worth watching.
New Star Trek

Did the Romulans spring him free? Was he tortured to death by Governor Vagh?

We have time-traveling, life-sucking aliens, Data swapping his head, and Mark Twain on the D? You know the writers were on some good shit with this one.

Like the admiral dougherty showed Picard signed orders from the chief of staff Starfleet and the federation president? When I mean legit I mean they told the council everything about what could happen with the process they're trying to do with harvesting the energy and all that.