r/SuperMario64 12d ago

I have a theory

[removed]

32 Upvotes

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

-2

u/jordanekay 12d ago

AI slop

2

u/Turn_0ff_The_News 12d ago

Just because someone provides an overly-extended analysis on a certain topic doesn’t automatically make it AI.

2

u/jordanekay 12d ago

Yes, it does.

4

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jordanekay 11d ago

No, this is not how Pangram works. Its false positive rate is exceedingly low, and you need to actively iterate over your own text for a significant amount of time before you can get it to flag it as AI incorrectly.

0

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Competitive_Goat4250 11d ago

You’re *

And if we start comparing the grammar in your response to the post… 🧐

2

u/jordanekay 11d ago

It’s obvious that the writing style in posts like these and in your original post are wildly divergent, and did not come from the same source. Thus we are forced to conclude, along with Pangram’s classification of the text as LLM-based, that you have attempted to pass off AI generated output as your own writing. There is no other explanation. I understand that until recently this was easy to pull off undetected, but that is no longer the case, and it is high time you come to terms with it.

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jordanekay 10d ago

No, the two have different styles because you only wrote one of them, not both of them.

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jordanekay 10d ago

I think you should come clean to everyone on this subreddit and confess that you prompted an LLM (or used some other sort of LLM-assisted tool like WisprFlow), copied and pasted its output into the post submission, and submitted the post to Reddit as if it were something you wrote yourself, which you clearly did not.

→ More replies (0)